Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
David Carr-the media equation "For One Night at Fox, News tops Agenda"- graham4anything Nov 2012 #1
Good read n/t malaise Nov 2012 #3
Fox's part in the apparatus began long before the election JHB Nov 2012 #10
News my as* --- they just didn't want to be permanently associated with THE LOSER!! nt Tigress DEM Nov 2012 #58
Thank you OKNancy Nov 2012 #2
I don't think there are any people who would glowing Nov 2012 #4
+1 DeeDeeNY Nov 2012 #6
+2 bahrbearian Nov 2012 #21
Without all that hard work by the Obama team, Obama would never have won but.... fasttense Nov 2012 #5
i think so too barbtries Nov 2012 #7
I must disagree with you about 2016 and 2020. Jim Lane Nov 2012 #8
Those who forget history nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #9
Those who are confined by history are trapped into repeating it. randome Nov 2012 #12
Well, barring little things like, say alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #11
SO you think the GOP is done nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #13
No, I think using 1964 and 1972 is just plain silly alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #17
It's not a silly analogy because it's not an analogy. It's just a warning against complacency. Jim Lane Nov 2012 #40
1968 was the democrats fault for tossing the 3rd greatest president ever in the river graham4anything Nov 2012 #16
"Vietnam was a stupid wedge issue distraction..." alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #18
That stood out to me also and gave me a sort of nasty feeling in the pit sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #24
I see your strategy but I am not biting. graham4anything Nov 2012 #28
Isn't life itself performance art? (referencing the response above) graham4anything Nov 2012 #38
Life is indeed a work of art alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #64
add my 80,000 plus posts at CGCS with the 3000s more Kerry board,& 1000s more on Gore boards graham4anything Nov 2012 #70
We must stay aggressive. Obama's OFA is still active, just go to it's website. The organization bluestate10 Nov 2012 #19
Yes President Obama won fair and square nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #14
Nader and the 97,000 people that voted for him in Florida put Bush in office. The sooner that bluestate10 Nov 2012 #20
Wrong , Nader was right. bahrbearian Nov 2012 #22
Problem is, and this is puzzling, well not really... nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #23
THE SUPREME COURT- you mean the one that Nader lied and said Bush/Gore were the same? graham4anything Nov 2012 #29
Escuse me, but NADER had nothing to do with taht decision nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #30
Again, if Gore won NH, the US Supreme Court would never have been called in. Election over in NH graham4anything Nov 2012 #31
What I do not understand is your hate for the democratic system nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #34
So sad to see you trying so hard to make a crime out of something sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #35
You lost your own point. Gore/Kerry did not have the community organization Obama did. graham4anything Nov 2012 #37
Wrong, but keep on thinking that. Thankfully a majority of Dems sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #25
Blaming Nader stops Democrats from wasting their vote again in any new election graham4anything Nov 2012 #27
Are you that ingnorant of history? nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #33
I have nothing against that. 50% should be required though. with a runoff. graham4anything Nov 2012 #36
We have 52 states? zappaman Nov 2012 #81
I don't know what to say to you if you think that blaming Nader sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #39
Before you call people names, let me ask you-were you on the street protesting in 2000 in Fl or DC? graham4anything Nov 2012 #42
They will never admit it. One of the 99 Nov 2012 #54
The persistent claim that Anonymous somehow... bvar22 Nov 2012 #15
"WE WON FAIR AND SQUARE and nobody could have or would have stolen it because WE WON..." Snarkoleptic Nov 2012 #26
Al Gore didn't get to say it because of Ralph Nader. graham4anything Nov 2012 #32
Nader was a factor, but if all votes had been counted we'd never had to suffer Bewsh. Snarkoleptic Nov 2012 #41
SHh, already mentioned that, but nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #43
If one believes Nader, then one agrees Bush and Gore were the same & Bush&Kerry the same graham4anything Nov 2012 #44
I'm a Gore fan RobertEarl Nov 2012 #45
as President Obama says FORWARD. Gore won NH without Nader. graham4anything Nov 2012 #46
Go to bed RobertEarl Nov 2012 #48
This thread is about how President Obama won with no help from a hacker graham4anything Nov 2012 #50
I've always wondered if this 'blame Nader' was meant sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #78
I see Nader blamers as authoritarians RobertEarl Nov 2012 #80
While you prattle on Nader nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #60
This thread is being hijacked by Ralph Nader fans. A terrorist hacker did not help President Obama graham4anything Nov 2012 #47
You have Nader on the brain? RobertEarl Nov 2012 #49
stop with the conspiracy theories. Terrorist hackers belong in jail. Anarchy is not democracy. graham4anything Nov 2012 #51
Right E-vote is anarchy RobertEarl Nov 2012 #52
So do you believe Nader's line that Bush and Gore were one and the same? graham4anything Nov 2012 #53
Get Nader off your head RobertEarl Nov 2012 #55
Funny you and the 2 others do not answer that question. Backing Nader means believing his lies. graham4anything Nov 2012 #57
Vote for Hillary in 2016 and make sure Jeb doesn't win. Then there is no problem. graham4anything Nov 2012 #56
What if...perish the though, Hillary don't run? nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #59
Vote for Michelle. And keep Chicago together.Remember, Chicago wins elections and is a good word graham4anything Nov 2012 #62
And Michelle is running? nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #65
2025-2032. Michelle46, followed by Chelsea47 after Hillary45 and President Obama44 retire graham4anything Nov 2012 #69
We call that a coronation, not an election nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #73
What do you mean it's been proven false?? reusrename Nov 2012 #61
It was proven false above on this thread by someone living in Ohio. I trust they would know graham4anything Nov 2012 #63
I agree with everything you say, especially the part about Wellstone. reusrename Nov 2012 #66
RUUUNNNN. COMIES UNDER MY BED!!! nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #68
152 electoral votes. And they would all be Dem votes. Very simple, once you understand graham4anything Nov 2012 #71
No, there is no brain freeze here nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #72
If you believe in an anarchist who cowardly doesn't reveal their name(the hacker) then admit it. graham4anything Nov 2012 #74
Lead a horse to water comes at this point nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #75
What you are saying is...(I think) that... graham4anything Nov 2012 #76
No, that is what you are saying nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #77
No, that is what you are saying. If we both are saying it, then we are in agreement. graham4anything Nov 2012 #79
Ah red baiting again nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #82
the only red I bait is redstates. I love socialists & Communists. Especially REAL ones. graham4anything Nov 2012 #83
Are you saying the 2000 and 2004 elections were not stolen? sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #84
Dirty tricks changed 2000, yes. But dirty tricks have been part of many an election. graham4anything Nov 2012 #87
So you don't believe the 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen. That's all I wanted sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #88
No one mentioned any terrorist hacker. Can you link to that information please? sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #85
the guy/woman with no name. Whom you have credited with stopping Karl Rove. graham4anything Nov 2012 #86
You're not making any sense. Maybe you thought you were talking sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #89
It was a great GOTV effort, but it doesn't deny the fact that an election can easily be joeybee12 Nov 2012 #67
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»David Carr-NY Times "...»Reply #43