Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

D23MIURG23

(2,821 posts)
384. Two points.
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 11:29 PM
Nov 2012

1) you don't get to tell me how to post.

2) It was a legitimate counter example IMO. I can be as contrarian as the next person, but that often doesn't lead to well thought out positions.

Show us the proof, Anony Berlum Nov 2012 #1
Yes, we do. n/t ProSense Nov 2012 #2
At least someone who thinks like Data Coyotl Nov 2012 #202
EXCELLENT!!!! Man, LOVED that show! calimary Nov 2012 #251
Love this, thanks for making my day. n/t AnnieK401 Nov 2012 #99
The proof is out there. reusrename Nov 2012 #136
+1 valerief Nov 2012 #184
Not this BS again. Coyotl Nov 2012 #203
Do you actually think you're going to stop people from posting their opinions on this board?.... OldDem2012 Nov 2012 #233
I'm going to give y'all one more chance to respond. reusrename Nov 2012 #250
Maybe you could choose not to read these threads, instead of being, you know, WinkyDink Nov 2012 #253
Welcome to DU, reusrename! calimary Nov 2012 #291
Always! reusrename Nov 2012 #322
Exactly. It's been proven every way ....statistically, technically, timing, cover-up.... loudsue Nov 2012 #327
+1. Phx_Dem Nov 2012 #357
where's the beef? heaven05 Nov 2012 #219
"He's Occupying the WH at the moment"? What does that mean? nm Cha Nov 2012 #264
small heaven05 Nov 2012 #284
Anonymous is a JOKE!! SkyDaddy7 Nov 2012 #332
A group like Anon coming forward with details? the group wouldnt survive that pasto76 Nov 2012 #3
Who said they have to come forward? ProSense Nov 2012 #8
Really? Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2012 #120
Send it to Mother Jones, Atlantic Monthly and about 1/2 a dozen other news outlets TalkingDog Nov 2012 #162
The foreign press has written about electronically flipping the primary for Romney. reusrename Nov 2012 #170
Do you have a link for that? Son of Gob Nov 2012 #213
Unfortunately, the links have been scrubbed the last time I looked. reusrename Nov 2012 #257
lol AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #315
I found a live link to the article at ukprogressive. reusrename Nov 2012 #336
Yes, and that entire line of logic fails for the following reasons. AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #349
It's suddenly become obvious that you don't have a grasp of the question being raised here. reusrename Nov 2012 #361
That quoted bit is the claim being made by the fellow doing this statistical analysis. AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #363
We are obviously not talking about the same thing. reusrename Nov 2012 #364
You are not clicking to the idea that the '10%' is an illusion. AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #366
yes, peer review is necessary - can't image it taking more than another month or two reusrename Nov 2012 #368
Again, I will believe it when I see it verified. AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #371
Obama was not a candidate in the Republican primaries. reusrename Nov 2012 #372
So let's see it independently verified. Peer reviewed. AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #373
And published in a scientific journal. reusrename Nov 2012 #374
I found a live link. reusrename Nov 2012 #337
I've been subscribing to Mother Jones & The Atlantic for years... Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2012 #172
It's heaven05 Nov 2012 #223
See! heaven05 Nov 2012 #222
"I am completely ignorant when it comes to anything technical" AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #314
Can't answer my questions yourself Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2012 #345
There is absolutely NOTHING more dangerous about sharing the code and logs AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #348
Thank you! Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2012 #351
Could easily be some AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #352
I will definitely Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2012 #355
I don't think so, not with so many people on both sides watching. AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #360
Sincere thanks, once again. Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2012 #362
Agreed. HooptieWagon Nov 2012 #171
You are so right. Maybe they rainy Nov 2012 #41
love them anyway. put fear into the one percent roguevalley Nov 2012 #141
They can dump whatever evidence they have on Wikileaks AgingAmerican Nov 2012 #148
All they'd have to do is anonymously send their proof to the FBI. n/t pnwmom Nov 2012 #241
But who is Anon referring to in this video to give info to? Wish they would turn proof over. glinda Nov 2012 #309
I think they would if they'd actually done this pnwmom Nov 2012 #330
I have not passed judgement on this at the moment. glinda Nov 2012 #359
Because Anonymous can rest assured that if such info were provided, MannyGoldstein Nov 2012 #4
He's untouchable! n/t ProSense Nov 2012 #9
Like war criminals, no? MannyGoldstein Nov 2012 #27
Sure, he's untouchable. n/t ProSense Nov 2012 #62
I agree Manny. There is no reason for Anon to expose themselves. I doubt that they have any rhett o rick Nov 2012 #131
'No reason', apart from basic honesty, that is, and a desire not to be complicit muriel_volestrangler Nov 2012 #353
His untouchability is determined by his masters.But they have a long history of protecting their own rhett o rick Nov 2012 #127
On what fucking planet is Rove going to be prosecuted? Fumesucker Nov 2012 #22
He may not be prosecuted but . . . brush Nov 2012 #143
Kinda like how Mike Connell got his comeuppance when he died in that plane crash... cascadiance Nov 2012 #240
Yeah brush Nov 2012 #256
"Rove would be prosecuted" marions ghost Nov 2012 #37
Indeed, I did. nt MannyGoldstein Nov 2012 #39
Yep..Rove would be prosecuted just like INdemo Nov 2012 #88
THey could at least try treestar Nov 2012 #154
Or Oliy North. Given a fine of $100 and 2 hours community service. nm rhett o rick Nov 2012 #165
Yep, once the Repukes broke the seal Rex Nov 2012 #210
But they can be assured that they would be. I just love threads like this. Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #186
You need to read and listen to Stephen Spoonamore to understand. They did not use the Dustlawyer Nov 2012 #5
That is also just a bunch of BS, just like the current deal, piled higher and deeper Coyotl Nov 2012 #72
certainly no facts this time around Celebration Nov 2012 #94
It is a n incontrovertable fact that the primary was electronically flipped. reusrename Nov 2012 #177
Because you believe it, right? Coyotl Nov 2012 #196
Of course not. reusrename Nov 2012 #246
Look, Karl, you lost this time. Call it "Kerry's Revenge." WinkyDink Nov 2012 #254
What part of Anonymous ... do you not understand? GeorgeGist Nov 2012 #6
What part of conspiracy theory don't you understand? ProSense Nov 2012 #10
I understand sulphurdunn Nov 2012 #29
Perhaps unprovable is the point. sofa king Nov 2012 #227
They can supply the proof to the FBI or any other government official pnwmom Nov 2012 #245
I'm sure Anonymous isn't out to impress you Eyes of the World Nov 2012 #7
"There is 'evidence' in the behavior of Rove on election night." ProSense Nov 2012 #12
Gawd . . . if only that were possible. eom BlueCaliDem Nov 2012 #53
Evidence in this case is simple, and necessary: the code alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #15
I predict we will never see the code RomneyLies Nov 2012 #42
That's my suspicion, too alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #56
Precisely RomneyLies Nov 2012 #104
The "anonymous" claims were a joke in my opinion. JDPriestly Nov 2012 #121
Sorry to pop your bubble, but it is science. reusrename Nov 2012 #262
So evidence equals speculation? Riftaxe Nov 2012 #268
Well, I don't know what speculation you are referring to. reusrename Nov 2012 #323
Are you talking about the 2 -count 'em, 2- malfunctioning machines in PA? randome Nov 2012 #333
No. That's not the story. reusrename Nov 2012 #335
The gigantic hole in your evidence jeff47 Nov 2012 #369
That would be a clever response if you had a clue. reusrename Nov 2012 #370
Your first sentence states something that isn't known. jeff47 Nov 2012 #375
I do understand you much better now. You are definitely on the right track. reusrename Nov 2012 #377
The reason you "round up the others" is you have no other reliable measurement. jeff47 Nov 2012 #378
Some clarifications. reusrename Nov 2012 #379
Calculation requires actual data. jeff47 Nov 2012 #380
Yeah, he probably is a dumbshit. reusrename Nov 2012 #381
No, he may very well be right. But he needs to use data to show he is right. (nt) jeff47 Nov 2012 #382
Fair enough. reusrename Nov 2012 #383
what heaven05 Nov 2012 #287
Two machines in PA. Out of thousands nationwide. randome Nov 2012 #288
okey dokey heaven05 Nov 2012 #294
That could be. reusrename Nov 2012 #326
I don't honestly know if that was a key element.. reusrename Nov 2012 #324
Statistical abnormalities are real, but they are indirect evidence D23MIURG23 Nov 2012 #310
Well, I agree with your claim, but this isn't really a statistical abnormality, it's an algorithm. reusrename Nov 2012 #325
Wouldn't there be some evidence marions ghost Nov 2012 #64
It's remarkable that one of the most exacting scientific practices there is (programming) alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #70
Could you give me a binary answer please? marions ghost Nov 2012 #85
Exactly treestar Nov 2012 #158
Yes, it would all be right there on the log files, plain as day. Coyotl Nov 2012 #81
And Vanity Fair? marions ghost Nov 2012 #87
You're closer to getting this than most. Computer science forensics could find the AikidoSoul Nov 2012 #150
"There is evidence" -- Where is this "evidence"? NYC Liberal Nov 2012 #65
And then Anonymous gets no credit treestar Nov 2012 #155
Of course they are. pnwmom Nov 2012 #242
Where's the code? Where's the code? Where's the code? Where's the code? alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #11
Shouldn't be up to Anonymous to prove it marions ghost Nov 2012 #75
Nor is it up to zealots to prove their god exists because they already know he does Coyotl Nov 2012 #86
God? marions ghost Nov 2012 #92
Your little laughing guy doesn't mask your disturbed anger. WinkyDink Nov 2012 #255
Of course it should -- if they're not just making up a good story pnwmom Nov 2012 #243
"Credit for Romney's loss" marions ghost Nov 2012 #267
Precisely. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #317
I'm fairly certain... 99Forever Nov 2012 #13
Strange ProSense Nov 2012 #14
Really? 99Forever Nov 2012 #21
"Then why do you feel compelled to respond?" ProSense Nov 2012 #24
It's not ProSense who "demands" it. It's basic modern scientific claim-making alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #19
Anonymous doesn't... 99Forever Nov 2012 #26
"Get over it. Neither of you are that important." ProSense Nov 2012 #36
I'm not the one making demands of someone I don't even know. 99Forever Nov 2012 #48
"Get over it" ProSense Nov 2012 #55
Have fun tilting at windmills. 99Forever Nov 2012 #66
Demand: "Get over it" ProSense Nov 2012 #69
When you are leaning over to believe something, it looks like others are tilting Coyotl Nov 2012 #91
Whatever you say, buddy. 99Forever Nov 2012 #96
But you are willing to trust these people you don't know to have done something AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #319
Is that what I said? 99Forever Nov 2012 #342
Has nothing to do with me alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #44
Release the Code... Hell yeah! RobertEarl Nov 2012 #214
All the more reason for Anonymous to release it if they know it alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #220
Why don't your officials release it? RobertEarl Nov 2012 #225
Why are they suddenly "my" officials alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #226
Obviously you do not RobertEarl Nov 2012 #229
Wait, are you Anonymous? alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #230
So, you agree the code is not transparent RobertEarl Nov 2012 #234
Of course the code is secret alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #236
"Without code as evidence, of course not." RobertEarl Nov 2012 #239
Sorry Robert, the fact that elections in our country have problems D23MIURG23 Nov 2012 #312
It would not be easy for anon to prove thesquanderer Nov 2012 #247
Release the code and describe its function alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #260
Do you have any idea what it takes to develop software for embedded systems? AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #320
They're super-heroes. They can do anything. randome Nov 2012 #334
I took no position on that thesquanderer Nov 2012 #339
If they released code that can be proven to still be ON the machines AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #346
Exactly. Trying to rudely "kill" the messenger. didn't work. nm Cha Nov 2012 #271
well heaven05 Nov 2012 #292
Shame on you!! pocoloco Nov 2012 #146
Are you more important than we are? treestar Nov 2012 #160
That's because Anonymous is mostly just a PR campaign. AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #318
Sorry dood. 99Forever Nov 2012 #343
Uh huh. That's why when I patch code, I can show the before/after edits and explain why. AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #347
Wow dooooood... 99Forever Nov 2012 #350
And you have a list of "disinterested third parties" Stevepol Nov 2012 #32
Any good programmer could replicate and verify alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #35
Science is one thing, reality is another. Stevepol Nov 2012 #216
does anonymous make you upset? argiel1234 Nov 2012 #278
No, Anonymous does not upset me at all alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #279
anon does not answer to you...that is the beauty argiel1234 Nov 2012 #280
Whether Anonymous answers to me is beside the point alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #281
anon scares your worldview argiel1234 Nov 2012 #283
Sure. Every time a CT gains traction on DU, the people asking questions are said to be 'scared'. randome Nov 2012 #290
anon will come at it again.. argiel1234 Nov 2012 #293
That's the proof? That we won an election? randome Nov 2012 #295
We won because anonymous didnt allow electronic voting fraud argiel1234 Nov 2012 #296
You have no evidence of that. Neither does Anonymous. randome Nov 2012 #297
exactly heaven05 Nov 2012 #34
I'm 100% certain RomneyLies Nov 2012 #45
Worst than a fairy tale, it is disinformation supporting disinformation, intended to deceive voters Coyotl Nov 2012 #95
It reminds me of faith in the supernatural. Proof is irrelevant, the Savior is coming. freshwest Nov 2012 #139
I've been putting the cultists on ignore RomneyLies Nov 2012 #142
Might as well. Going in circles, like arguing with repukes. Just believe, it'll all gonna happen! freshwest Nov 2012 #192
Precisely. Parsimony and skepticism are practically a lost art. AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #321
And most people don't give a flying fuck about Anonymous' claims treestar Nov 2012 #159
any evidence Anonymous may have was illegally acquired Evasporque Nov 2012 #16
Great, one conspiracy theory and two crooks? ProSense Nov 2012 #20
You're thinking of law enforcement agencies. JimDandy Nov 2012 #169
How the information is obtained doesn't matter to the media, HooptieWagon Nov 2012 #180
Anonymous is not a part of the government, so the evidence would be admissible. The problem Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #187
ORCA is a smokescreen; wrong place to look. Atman Nov 2012 #17
Then the evidence ProSense Nov 2012 #28
Why would it be "easy" to find? Atman Nov 2012 #61
"why would they be looking at Husted software patches?" ProSense Nov 2012 #74
yes or no? heaven05 Nov 2012 #18
I love the idea of a deterrent ProSense Nov 2012 #31
Ya...that's sure to happen. CanSocDem Nov 2012 #189
Yeah! Who needs pesky facts or evidence? NYC Liberal Nov 2012 #58
Ego heaven05 Nov 2012 #103
Apparently facts are a terrible thing to waste on you as well NYC Liberal Nov 2012 #113
your heaven05 Nov 2012 #117
Any thinking person would want facts. NYC Liberal Nov 2012 #151
and heaven05 Nov 2012 #191
Well, keep spreading the meme that Democrats can't win NYC Liberal Nov 2012 #212
Oh please. heaven05 Nov 2012 #218
If Rove created this whole false flag, how is Rove deterred by it? Coyotl Nov 2012 #97
Anonymous will provide proof in 24 business hours. msanthrope Nov 2012 #23
NO HE'S NOT!!!! heaven05 Nov 2012 #38
She. And my ego has nothing to do with this--either Anonymous msanthrope Nov 2012 #52
Hey, Orly Taitz is much more believeable than this cup of tea Coyotl Nov 2012 #102
I heaven05 Nov 2012 #107
ROFL alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #46
Can the hymns be far behind? A favorite: msanthrope Nov 2012 #57
There was no vote hacking in 2004 RomneyLies Nov 2012 #25
There was a commission that found several irregularies, including ProSense Nov 2012 #47
Now that is funny marions ghost Nov 2012 #101
Funny how easy it was to hack punch cards in 2004 Coyotl Nov 2012 #105
I agree they should release all proof of vote hacking. boston bean Nov 2012 #30
This just in: ProSense stands up for poor put upon Karl Rove who has been accused of evildoing Fumesucker Nov 2012 #33
This just in: Prove Rove is a criminal not a myth or a legend ProSense Nov 2012 #40
Bravo RomneyLies Nov 2012 #49
Rove has far too much dirt on our political system to ever go to court Fumesucker Nov 2012 #63
He's an evil genius, untouchable ProSense Nov 2012 #71
Rove is the Devil; Anonymous is God...It's time to leave the faith-reasoning to the theologians alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #73
You think TPTB are going to let Rove sing in the courtroom? Fumesucker Nov 2012 #84
+1000 heaven05 Nov 2012 #43
Rove is laughing too. ProSense Nov 2012 #50
So is Bush and co. aandegoons Nov 2012 #108
Rove just lost $300 million dollars, and his funders are not happy ProSense Nov 2012 #111
Oh I would love to see it. aandegoons Nov 2012 #119
Right On bahrbearian Nov 2012 #78
Too many fumes maybe? Coyotl Nov 2012 #109
I'm not falling for anything Fumesucker Nov 2012 #115
You Madam seem to be defending Rove bahrbearian Nov 2012 #147
I am defending Rove. I think he failed all by himself w/o any help from a bullshit story! Coyotl Nov 2012 #188
Even Rove cannot be convicted without evidence treestar Nov 2012 #164
no shit. blind and unquestioning partisonship no matter which party makes for strange bedfellows!" boilerbabe Nov 2012 #178
as their slogan says - "we are anonymous, we are legion" quinnox Nov 2012 #51
I helped investigate 2004. IdaBriggs Nov 2012 #54
Exactly bahrbearian Nov 2012 #76
Yes, exactly: ProSense Nov 2012 #89
Just like the banks were held accountable for this depression? MannyGoldstein Nov 2012 #125
"Just like the banks were held accountable for this depression?" ProSense Nov 2012 #129
Sounds like your defending Rove from slander , thats Too funny. bahrbearian Nov 2012 #145
Not to me, it doesn't.. It sounds like she's asking for accountability and for that Cha Nov 2012 #275
I helped investigate 2004. Coyotl Nov 2012 #116
So "the people in charge" were interested. Then what? rhett o rick Nov 2012 #238
Blah Blah Blah Fence rider Nov 2012 #59
You are correct. They need to put up or shut up. If they cannot or will not provide proof, patricia92243 Nov 2012 #60
If Velvet Revolution didn't have a DONATE button, would this "Election Fraud" even exist? Coyotl Nov 2012 #67
If... KharmaTrain Nov 2012 #68
+1, I agree 100%. tammywammy Nov 2012 #83
I'm inclined to see this as a horse's head in the bed starroute Nov 2012 #77
Wouldn't this be better peddled on Free Republic? nt NorthCarolina Nov 2012 #79
Yeah, they're all into evidence. n/t ProSense Nov 2012 #82
How to Rig An American Election - A 10 Page Historical Analysis, Harpers Melinda Nov 2012 #80
How would you explain the massive push ongoing by some here NorthCarolina Nov 2012 #100
Easy to explain Coyotl Nov 2012 #122
Whenever there's a massive push marions ghost Nov 2012 #273
There has been a massive push to discredit creationism, D23MIURG23 Nov 2012 #316
A "lack of interest" in a topic NorthCarolina Nov 2012 #340
Two points. D23MIURG23 Nov 2012 #384
Not really marions ghost Nov 2012 #341
I suppose it depends on where you are looking. D23MIURG23 Nov 2012 #385
Because the truth is important to some people. AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #367
PLEASE PEOPLE read this article!!! marions ghost Nov 2012 #106
I still think they stole Ohio in 2004 edhopper Nov 2012 #90
Me too, and I know exactly how they did it and who did. That's why I know this is BS thru and thru Coyotl Nov 2012 #124
Are you saying that edhopper Nov 2012 #128
The President's narrow victories in numerous states laid to rest the issue grantcart Nov 2012 #93
anonymous heaven05 Nov 2012 #98
Blind faith without evidence is no protection. HooptieWagon Nov 2012 #193
I heaven05 Nov 2012 #198
Voter supression makes a fix possible. JimDandy Nov 2012 #197
If Rove is EVER prosecuted, Are_grits_groceries Nov 2012 #110
+1000 heaven05 Nov 2012 #112
"If you think the Dems are lily white in the area of voter fraud, I have a bridge to sell you." ProSense Nov 2012 #123
My bad. Are_grits_groceries Nov 2012 #126
exactly heaven05 Nov 2012 #344
The anonymous claim that it hacked into Rove's vote-tampering JDPriestly Nov 2012 #114
K&R arely staircase Nov 2012 #118
If you want "evidence" vote for someone who will give you "investigations" Eyes of the World Nov 2012 #130
Just maybe this anonymous stuff is all made up. longship Nov 2012 #132
Snicker nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #133
No, Anonymous is not going to take the risk.... OldDem2012 Nov 2012 #134
"Where's your evidence Anonymous was not able to do what they claimed to have done?" ProSense Nov 2012 #137
LOL. You're normally a smart poster, but you just don't get Anonymous, do you? nt. OldDem2012 Nov 2012 #231
Right. There is no way for them... Wait Wut Nov 2012 #149
There is plent of evidence from 2000 on why does the Obama administration need aandegoons Nov 2012 #135
And if the Republicans win in 2016 RomneyLies Nov 2012 #138
The real problem with the bogus Anon Rove Idiocy is Coyotl Nov 2012 #140
Where is the evidence that Anonymous claims they hacked the election toddaa Nov 2012 #144
This is the most sensible "no they didn't" post in this thread. I suspect you are 100% correct, Dark n Stormy Knight Nov 2012 #331
They have said enough that any competent ivestigative/intelligence organization should be able geckosfeet Nov 2012 #152
Totally agreed treestar Nov 2012 #153
Karl we are watching pipewrench Nov 2012 #156
"We watched as Karl’s speared ORCA" ProSense Nov 2012 #161
It started... DirtyDawg Nov 2012 #157
I prefer that Anonymous keep their info to themselves Cirque du So-What Nov 2012 #163
Yup, better to protect the crooks from being investigated. n/t ProSense Nov 2012 #168
Exactly meanit Nov 2012 #221
We the people have the right to bring to light from the shadows. Hutzpa Nov 2012 #166
Rove's behavior to me proves he lalalu Nov 2012 #167
Does anyone seriously think Rove did NOT try to tamper with the results? HopeHoops Nov 2012 #173
I thought the statement explained that. sofa king Nov 2012 #174
Great post. go west young man Nov 2012 #313
Responses indicate that we're pretty scattered on this election fraud issue. Gregorian Nov 2012 #175
Anonymous and tactics The Traveler Nov 2012 #176
What Sort of Evidence? Skraxx Nov 2012 #179
That's why she's asking for it Fumesucker Nov 2012 #183
"Seriously, there's really nothing they could present to prove their claims." ProSense Nov 2012 #185
Yes, What Do You Think Would Suffice to "Prove" Their Claims? Skraxx Nov 2012 #201
There's always a counterclaim to any evidence alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #228
Just Because People Believe It's PLAUSIBLE Doesn't Mean People Believe It Definitely Happened Skraxx Nov 2012 #298
There isn't even circumstantial evidence. randome Nov 2012 #299
Where Do I Make That Assumption? Skraxx Nov 2012 #300
Then I apologize. randome Nov 2012 #301
Of Course We Won It For Who We Are, No Doubt Skraxx Nov 2012 #302
Sorry but that's not their job. They have brought forth suspicions that this happened. Cleita Nov 2012 #181
You don't start investigations based on anonymous suspicions. ProSense Nov 2012 #182
I think there is more than a loony suspicion here. I believe a warrant to investigate the Cleita Nov 2012 #190
exactly heaven05 Nov 2012 #195
That has nothing ProSense Nov 2012 #199
Got it. Cleita Nov 2012 #200
Here's what I know having watched this closely at the time re: Ohio + Anonymous flamingdem Nov 2012 #194
Oh, THIS is an interesting post Flamingdem Matariki Nov 2012 #217
There has been proof since 2000, and during every election since. there are books and movies on the s robinlynne Nov 2012 #204
DU rec...nt SidDithers Nov 2012 #205
Rove is dogshit, he is out of the loop Rex Nov 2012 #206
That would be suicide. CBS news: Republican IT Guru Dies In Plane Crash Zorra Nov 2012 #207
Who would get killed? n/t ProSense Nov 2012 #209
That's what nobody wants to find out. nt Zorra Nov 2012 #308
BIG Money plays for keeps. WinkyDink Nov 2012 #259
If it would have been me who did it InsultComicDog Nov 2012 #208
Here's my two cents. The people who would know for sure have enough info, rzemanfl Nov 2012 #211
Rec. allrevvedup Nov 2012 #215
Interesting thought experiments: what evidence would satisfy vote fraud coalition_unwilling Nov 2012 #224
I will go much more modest: what evidence would convince me of this particular claim alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #232
I really think anonymous/wikileaks/Fitrakis jumped the gun, understandably they believed flamingdem Nov 2012 #235
Fair enough. I'm a big believer in Occam's Razor and, barring presentation coalition_unwilling Nov 2012 #237
What if the point is that the evidence can't be produced? sofa king Nov 2012 #258
That's fine...I've said throughout this thread that there's nothing wrong with alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #261
I'll bet we can agree on this, too: sofa king Nov 2012 #358
You need to look at the stuff Mike Collins has published on algorithmic vote flipping. reusrename Nov 2012 #269
I'm sure Anon will give us the whole story when, where and how they want to. They keep their id's judesedit Nov 2012 #244
I am perfectly happy James48 Nov 2012 #248
Congressman John Conyers had plenty of evidence eyewall Nov 2012 #249
What if it can no longer BE proven, being a transitory and random hacking program? WinkyDink Nov 2012 #252
that is what is great about anonymous argiel1234 Nov 2012 #263
one part of me thinks maindawg Nov 2012 #265
Give me a break! RoccoR5955 Nov 2012 #266
No, ProSense Nov 2012 #270
So you do not believe that reveling the code RoccoR5955 Nov 2012 #338
Agree with you marions ghost Nov 2012 #272
Wow. I'm surprised so many people are falling for this. aletier_v Nov 2012 #274
Well, why don't you elucidate just HOW it "was a joke," m-kay? Rove wasn't & isn't laughing. WinkyDink Nov 2012 #276
That technical description? It's Wizard of Oz mumbo jumbo. aletier_v Nov 2012 #277
So...you're Anonymous? OMG! All this time and we didn't know! randome Nov 2012 #285
Your concern about Rove is touching argiel1234 Nov 2012 #289
Anonymous won't be Anonymous bucolic_frolic Nov 2012 #282
*Ahem* CLINT CURTIS, anybody? TrollBuster9090 Nov 2012 #286
And? ProSense Nov 2012 #303
Agreed! TrollBuster9090 Nov 2012 #307
Recommended. William769 Nov 2012 #304
It's the left-wing version of Bengazhi NightOwwl Nov 2012 #305
In olden days code was released PATRICK Nov 2012 #306
On the other hand... MrMickeysMom Nov 2012 #311
I haven't found really anything on Rove on AnonNews which is interesting. rightsideout Nov 2012 #328
"This isn't a movie.....This is real life, and Rove needs to be investigated if merrily Nov 2012 #329
Because we all accept Romney lied to American voters muriel_volestrangler Nov 2012 #354
Accepting that Romney was lying does not mean he was not also a felon. merrily Nov 2012 #356
The OP isn't about an investigation of Anonymous, though muriel_volestrangler Nov 2012 #365
Thank you for that SENSible post, ProSense. closeupready Nov 2012 #376
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Anonymous has definiti...»Reply #384