Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ok... It's From The Examiner... Re: Anonymous/Rove/Ohio... And Here's The Author: [View all]SidDithers
(44,228 posts)23. Sorry, your caselaw link isn't good enough...
do you have anything from Facebook?
Sid
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ok... It's From The Examiner... Re: Anonymous/Rove/Ohio... And Here's The Author: [View all]
WillyT
Nov 2012
OP
Right. People are so afraid they question something that appears without evidence.
randome
Nov 2012
#80
I'm Just Putting Out What's In The News... Even The Author Recognizes It May Be A False Claim...
WillyT
Nov 2012
#8
It would help the debate if you could cite some credible sources that may support your claim
Kaleva
Nov 2012
#19
So these super hackers can't think of any way to put it into the public... Anonymously?
Ohio Joe
Nov 2012
#16
Illegally obtained evidence is admissible, as long as it isn't the government, or the government's
msanthrope
Nov 2012
#38
Those are strawmen arguments. No one said their firewall was unbreakable. It only had to be secure
rhett o rick
Nov 2012
#39