General Discussion

Ohio Joe

(21,755 posts)

14. The story of the supposed 'anti-hack' is definitely bullshit...

Sun Nov 18, 2012, 02:42 PM

Nov 2012

I have no way of knowing who put it out but it is bullshit. Repugs create a magical phone app that can manipulate the vote everywhere... Then Anonymous manages to create some magical 'firewall' that blocks the magical phone app from... Doing it's magic.

Non-sense like this only plays with the heads of the gullible. Regardless of who started it,neither the repug part nor the Anonymous part are even slightly believable. It is another bad conspiracy running amok on DU.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

81 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ok... It's From The Examiner... Re: Anonymous/Rove/Ohio... And Here's The Author: [View all] WillyT Nov 2012 OP

Ah jeez RomneyLies Nov 2012 #1

Where's that damn Like button when you need it around here? Coyotl Nov 2012 #5

please heaven05 Nov 2012 #45

Why do you two jump in on every one of these threads? starroute Nov 2012 #65

Yep... We Got A Lot Of Shushers And Tut-Tutters Around Lately WillyT Nov 2012 #72

Right. People are so afraid they question something that appears without evidence. randome Nov 2012 #80

Is that the Univision Spray Tan version? flamingdem Nov 2012 #68

The other one is the PhotoShop Coyotl Nov 2012 #70

please heaven05 Nov 2012 #44

I have many clues RomneyLies Nov 2012 #47

duh heaven05 Nov 2012 #48

And then there's my second clue RomneyLies Nov 2012 #49

Aw Jeez, not RomneyLies 'aw jeezing' again Matariki Nov 2012 #78

Ohio was irrelevant. GeorgeGist Nov 2012 #2

Not to Rove! It was very relevant to Rove. sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #7

Three states were involved. nt bupkus Nov 2012 #28

Most likely Florida was one. nm rhett o rick Nov 2012 #35

How about NEXT TIME? n/t godai Nov 2012 #51

Only ONE Problem, that WASN'T Anonymous, it was a fraud video. Coyotl Nov 2012 #3

What do you mean by "fraud video?" They were fudging the feed on air? Squinch Nov 2012 #30

Can you prove that was a "fraud video"? Yes or no? nt. OldDem2012 Nov 2012 #32

Interesting underthematrix Nov 2012 #4

The video of KKKarl's election night apopletic seizure: bupkus Nov 2012 #74

kind of a left turn, but... la la Nov 2012 #76

That's in the full video I posted below bupkus Nov 2012 #79

Here's the full video with the visit to the FUX "news" "decision desk" - LOL bupkus Nov 2012 #75

IMO, Rove obviously had plans to flip Ohio just like he did in 2004 bupkus Nov 2012 #81

Good one, Willy RobertEarl Nov 2012 #6

I'm Just Putting Out What's In The News... Even The Author Recognizes It May Be A False Claim... WillyT Nov 2012 #8

Yup, he is taking the same POV I am nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #9

Sorry but this "expert" is an idiot Ohio Joe Nov 2012 #10

Maybe... And Maybe Anonymous Is Just Playing With Karl Rove's Head... WillyT Nov 2012 #11

Someone else? RobertEarl Nov 2012 #12

Maybe someone other than Anon is playing with someone other than KR's head Coyotl Nov 2012 #71

The story of the supposed 'anti-hack' is definitely bullshit... Ohio Joe Nov 2012 #14

Because we know illegally obtained evidence nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #13

Illegal evidence obtained by a third party is admissable Kaleva Nov 2012 #15

Ok, really nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #17

It would help the debate if you could cite some credible sources that may support your claim Kaleva Nov 2012 #19

And in reality this was obtained while commiting a felony or two nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #20

burglary is a felony Kaleva Nov 2012 #27

Whatever nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #36

Sorry, your caselaw link isn't good enough... SidDithers Nov 2012 #23

as long as it is not from an agent of the police it is admissable grantcart Nov 2012 #34

You think Anon will do that? nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #37

Do what? Very difficult to follow a conversation with you grantcart Nov 2012 #66

You are right, so why try to have a conversation nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #69

So these super hackers can't think of any way to put it into the public... Anonymously? Ohio Joe Nov 2012 #16

I gave them the benefit nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #18

Yeah, I do know Ohio Joe Nov 2012 #21

So the Denial of Service (a trademark of anon) nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #22

Did you read your own link? Nothing there says anything about any DDoS attack Ohio Joe Nov 2012 #24

You go on and search the web nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #25

So first you offer non-sense then bail Ohio Joe Nov 2012 #26

I could show you the first page of google nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #31

Very nicely stated, nadinbrzezinski. StrictlyRockers Nov 2012 #41

I heaven05 Nov 2012 #42

Yes, we do know what happened Ohio Joe Nov 2012 #52

Only Doctor Who can hack a phone app that way! randome Nov 2012 #53

No amount of evidence nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #54

No, I'll take ANY evidence. All you have offered denied your claim Ohio Joe Nov 2012 #56

Not even Anon, assuming they did it indeed, nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #58

Illegally obtained evidence is admissible, as long as it isn't the government, or the government's msanthrope Nov 2012 #38

Those are strawmen arguments. No one said their firewall was unbreakable. It only had to be secure rhett o rick Nov 2012 #39

Here, a more extensive post on what we actually know happened nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #40

Because there is no evidence that anything happened. randome Nov 2012 #43

A few minutes? WTF? Ohio Joe Nov 2012 #55

You are right, it's not the phone app nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #57

And of all the tens of thousand they have out, not a single one was saved? Ohio Joe Nov 2012 #60

You have fun with your fantasy as well nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #61

A fantasy that lots of people had the app? Ohio Joe Nov 2012 #64

There are some good explainations on the intertubes detailing how rhett o rick Nov 2012 #67

The truth will always, eventually, come out. bupkus Nov 2012 #29

This message was self-deleted by its author Overseas Nov 2012 #33

Oh, no surprise Milliesmom Nov 2012 #46

and heaven05 Nov 2012 #50

There is likely no evidence to support Anonymous' claim ProSense Nov 2012 #59

So the Ohio system went down at 11:13 p.m. in 2004... KansDem Nov 2012 #62

No, what's unusual is that both those years have a '2' in them. randome Nov 2012 #63

Just finished re-watching a 20 minute clip of Rove/FoxNews/Ohio and nc4bo Nov 2012 #73

KOS: Jesus Fucking Christ Coyotl Nov 2012 #77