HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » One REASON Romney Wanted ... » Reply #7

Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #6)

Fri Nov 16, 2012, 12:17 PM

7. I don't know about the Statute of Limitations, but apparently

Willard was there in the thick of things when the eToys caper went down. And maybe he continued to engage in criminal activities afterward as part of the coverup that he can be prosecuted for.

This story is a couple of weeks old and you may have already seen it, but it's neverteless an interesting refresher:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/02/1154336/-NEWS-BREAK-PoliticusUSA-com-story-Mitt-Romney-Benefited-Fraud-Corruption-Racketeering-eToys

To sum it up, Bain Capital attorneys committed Perjury to become the eToys Debtor's counsel, Creditors attorney and place their cohort in as President/ CEO. Then they "betrayed" their sworn duty to eToys, the shareholders and creditors for the sake of their secret client Bain Capital/ Kay Bee. When a bribe attempt was made and reported to the Delaware Department of Justice; a Bain Capital law firm attorney

(Colm Connolly - pictured right) was made the United States Attorney on August 2, 2001 and was a MNAT law firm partner in early 1999 (the SAME Exact time period that Mitt Romney is seeking to be "retroactively" resigned from). (Please see Dept of Justice Office of Legal Policy archived Resume of Mr. Connolly ).

The story is finally OUT by an up & coming Matt Taibbi type in the making (PoliticusUSA reporter Rmuse). Please read and spread the word to stop this Mitt Romney/ Bain Capital criminal disaster from trying to become an Al Capone in the White House?

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 41 replies Author Time Post
Segami Nov 2012 OP
Jackpine Radical Nov 2012 #1
Segami Nov 2012 #3
Berlum Nov 2012 #2
1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #4
Jackpine Radical Nov 2012 #5
1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #6
LineLineLineLineReply I don't know about the Statute of Limitations, but apparently
Jackpine Radical Nov 2012 #7
HooptieWagon Nov 2012 #10
laserhaas Nov 2012 #32
HooptieWagon Nov 2012 #36
laserhaas Nov 2012 #31
Segami Nov 2012 #8
heaven05 Nov 2012 #12
Segami Nov 2012 #15
heaven05 Nov 2012 #22
laserhaas Nov 2012 #33
laserhaas Nov 2012 #30
2naSalit Nov 2012 #9
calimary Nov 2012 #19
2naSalit Nov 2012 #23
calimary Nov 2012 #24
2naSalit Nov 2012 #25
2naSalit Nov 2012 #28
laserhaas Nov 2012 #34
2naSalit Nov 2012 #40
Wellstone ruled Nov 2012 #11
crunch60 Nov 2012 #18
2naSalit Nov 2012 #26
crunch60 Nov 2012 #29
santamargarita Nov 2012 #13
DirtyDawg Nov 2012 #14
2naSalit Nov 2012 #27
WillyT Nov 2012 #16
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Nov 2012 #17
crunch60 Nov 2012 #21
siligut Nov 2012 #20
laserhaas Nov 2012 #35
Lugnut Nov 2012 #37
Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #38
laserhaas Nov 2012 #39
hrmjustin Nov 2012 #41
Please login to view edit histories.