Reply #64

In the discussion thread: With Pot Legal, Police Worry About Road Safety [View all]

Response to Major Nikon (Reply #1)

Thu Nov 15, 2012, 08:55 PM

Honeycombe8 (18,012 posts)

64. LOL! Look for the ones going about 2 mph thru the fast food lanes, or parked at 7-11....

buying lots of Honeybuns.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

64 replies	Author	Time	Post
With Pot Legal, Police Worry About Road Safety [View all]	Seedersandleechers	Nov 2012	OP
I can see it now. Fast food drive through lanes will be staked out.	Major Nikon	Nov 2012	#1
Anyone ordering	Aerows	Nov 2012	#18
LOL! Look for the ones going about 2 mph thru the fast food lanes, or parked at 7-11....	Honeycombe8	Nov 2012	#64
Knew this was going to be the problem. Pot stays	Solomon	Nov 2012	#2
exactly	liberal_at_heart	Nov 2012	#3
I don't think that's an accurate description of it, actually	eShirl	Nov 2012	#5
(rolls eyes). Okay. Let me say it this way then. You can	Solomon	Nov 2012	#6
+1.	SammyWinstonJack	Nov 2012	#8
-1	eShirl	Nov 2012	#11
right back at you	eShirl	Nov 2012	#9
There are ways to test the active THC to determine if you are high.	boston bean	Nov 2012	#13
oh good	eShirl	Nov 2012	#17
let me get this straight your claiming that if one smokes a joint and tests positive a month later	azurnoir	Nov 2012	#22
That's not what the poster said	AlexSatan	Nov 2012	#46
The Marijuana Metabolic Pathway	jmowreader	Nov 2012	#58
Right. Because everyone reacts to pot the exact same way.	randome	Nov 2012	#4
My concern	gollygee	Nov 2012	#14
The majority of vehicular accidents have nothing to do with being under the influence	argiel1234	Nov 2012	#53
This is such bullshit.	Le Taz Hot	Nov 2012	#7
They will stop to test all drivers pulled to the side of the road, chomping down cheetoes	hlthe2b	Nov 2012	#10
Total non-issue.	Daemonaquila	Nov 2012	#12
Agreed.	Robb	Nov 2012	#16
Point of information. WA State will require testing for THC ONLY	eridani	Nov 2012	#15
This is sily...	sendero	Nov 2012	#19
Speaking from observation only (not personal experience) stoned drivers	demwing	Nov 2012	#39
Oh, like the hardcore stoners weren't out driving before the legalization vote.	marmar	Nov 2012	#20
Weed is not impairing at all	vanhalendlrband	Nov 2012	#21
I must qualify that	azurnoir	Nov 2012	#24
I agree somewhat.	immoderate	Nov 2012	#32
A lot depends on the person	LadyHawkAZ	Nov 2012	#41
This 35 year toker thinks yer funny with all your bluster and bravado...	cherokeeprogressive	Nov 2012	#59
I know drunks that say the same thing!	whistler162	Nov 2012	#61
people are already driving while stoned	datasuspect	Nov 2012	#23
I had the same thought. I doubt that legalization is going to result in a significant increase...	slackmaster	Nov 2012	#25
I don't see how everyone driving 20 mph could create any problems. n;t	2on2u	Nov 2012	#26
LOL!...isn't that the truth. My friends drive so damn slow I have to "edge them on"	BlueJazz	Nov 2012	#54
I am more worried those that want to Secede in Texas driving 85 legally with a gun in the car	graham4anything	Nov 2012	#27
i wouldn't say it's "legal", because it's not	unblock	Nov 2012	#28
what and alcohol is much safer	kydo	Nov 2012	#29
as already pointed out in the thread	PD Turk	Nov 2012	#30
Derp	WilliamPitt	Nov 2012	#31
I haven't smoked pot for probably 30 years now...	WCGreen	Nov 2012	#33
Yeah, I would drive for hours stoned...	jberryhill	Nov 2012	#36
People drink and drive	dem4ward	Nov 2012	#34
Because no one drove when it was illegal, right?	Eyes of the World	Nov 2012	#35
Saw it on the TV. Jemma almost killed those poor children!!	Dr Fate	Nov 2012	#37
Keep grasping for straws	devilgrrl	Nov 2012	#38
Easy, the same way you treat drunks or those under the influence of meds	nadinbrzezinski	Nov 2012	#40
Thank You	lalalu	Nov 2012	#51
Right? Pot smokers drive slllooowwwww! Granny and gramps will	adigal	Nov 2012	#42
I think most of the drivers that they will have to worry about	lexx21	Nov 2012	#43
I doubt there will be many more impaired drivers than before.	Blue_In_AK	Nov 2012	#44
there will not be one single additional impaired person on the road due to	pnwest	Nov 2012	#45
1st, the same amount of "impaired" drivers, second..	snooper2	Nov 2012	#47
I don't have the stamina to bother driving when I'm high. It's what delivery is for. n/t	Pryderi	Nov 2012	#48
Bullshit. Everyone who wanted to drive high already was	Nevernose	Nov 2012	#49
As if there are not impaired drivers littering the highway now.	mick063	Nov 2012	#50
About alcohol?	Blue_In_AK	Nov 2012	#55
Easy. Just enforce laws that already exist against reckless driving.	kestrel91316	Nov 2012	#52
The reason why some people voted against the initiative in WA was because of the DUI provision	Matariki	Nov 2012	#56
driving stoned is for pikers...	BlueMan Votes	Nov 2012	#57
If anything they should be grateful	kentauros	Nov 2012	#60
SWAT team aisle 12 - they just brought some brownies	Smilo	Nov 2012	#62
Oh please	RedCappedBandit	Nov 2012	#63

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.