Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CTyankee

(63,881 posts)
17. Yes, I had Justice Roberts "doctrine" on the ACA in the back of my mind when posting this.
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 11:24 AM
Nov 2012

That would seem to strengthen the hand of those of us who want to see this change made...

what would the constitutional argument against it be? unblock Nov 2012 #1
I really don't know specifically, but they could claim that it treats them unequally under the CTyankee Nov 2012 #3
there is NO guaranteed linkage between payments in and future benefits out. unblock Nov 2012 #23
I don't know JustAnotherGen Nov 2012 #2
Per the Supreme Court Congress has complete control of the matter. n/t PoliticAverse Nov 2012 #4
Even if the system changes materially and has an unequal impact on taxpayers? CTyankee Nov 2012 #7
It has... PoliticAverse Nov 2012 #22
The cap is set by law SCantiGOP Nov 2012 #5
Hard To See What Grounds It Could Be Challenged On, Ma'am The Magistrate Nov 2012 #6
That makes sense. So my question to you is "why hasn't this been suggested/tried?" CTyankee Nov 2012 #9
Short Answer, Ma'am? I Do Not Know... The Magistrate Nov 2012 #12
Well, lifting the cap would be a start. I think we need to get the ball rolling on this, though. CTyankee Nov 2012 #15
Of course it could, SS has passed Constitutional muster several times. The reasons the President Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #8
I understand. But liberals agree that we do need a long term fix at some point. CTyankee Nov 2012 #10
When you say liberals agree, what they are really doing is simply nodding their heads in Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #24
It would be foolish ... GeorgeGist Nov 2012 #25
I didn't write that 5 years is a long time. I wrote that 5 years is about as long as you Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #26
What is the current Zo Zig Nov 2012 #11
I believe it's 110,000 Champion Jack Nov 2012 #13
$113,700 in 2013, up from $110,100 k8conant Nov 2012 #16
Congress just needs to change SS payroll tax limit wishlist Nov 2012 #14
Yes, I had Justice Roberts "doctrine" on the ACA in the back of my mind when posting this. CTyankee Nov 2012 #17
I don't pay into SS as I'm a public employee in MO., I pay into PERS glacierbay Nov 2012 #18
While I am not dead set opposed to raising the cap Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #19
Without the cap, solvency of SS is assured rocktivity Nov 2012 #20
If an increase would draw a challenge, the same case could be made against the current cap TheKentuckian Nov 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can the cap on income sub...»Reply #17