Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Magistrate

(95,243 posts)
12. Short Answer, Ma'am? I Do Not Know...
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 11:17 AM
Nov 2012

Removing the cap would be the quickest and in my view most equitable 'fix' for the system. Personally, I would like to see a surcharge on the capital gains tax levied, and dedicated to the Social Security fund....

what would the constitutional argument against it be? unblock Nov 2012 #1
I really don't know specifically, but they could claim that it treats them unequally under the CTyankee Nov 2012 #3
there is NO guaranteed linkage between payments in and future benefits out. unblock Nov 2012 #23
I don't know JustAnotherGen Nov 2012 #2
Per the Supreme Court Congress has complete control of the matter. n/t PoliticAverse Nov 2012 #4
Even if the system changes materially and has an unequal impact on taxpayers? CTyankee Nov 2012 #7
It has... PoliticAverse Nov 2012 #22
The cap is set by law SCantiGOP Nov 2012 #5
Hard To See What Grounds It Could Be Challenged On, Ma'am The Magistrate Nov 2012 #6
That makes sense. So my question to you is "why hasn't this been suggested/tried?" CTyankee Nov 2012 #9
Short Answer, Ma'am? I Do Not Know... The Magistrate Nov 2012 #12
Well, lifting the cap would be a start. I think we need to get the ball rolling on this, though. CTyankee Nov 2012 #15
Of course it could, SS has passed Constitutional muster several times. The reasons the President Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #8
I understand. But liberals agree that we do need a long term fix at some point. CTyankee Nov 2012 #10
When you say liberals agree, what they are really doing is simply nodding their heads in Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #24
It would be foolish ... GeorgeGist Nov 2012 #25
I didn't write that 5 years is a long time. I wrote that 5 years is about as long as you Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #26
What is the current Zo Zig Nov 2012 #11
I believe it's 110,000 Champion Jack Nov 2012 #13
$113,700 in 2013, up from $110,100 k8conant Nov 2012 #16
Congress just needs to change SS payroll tax limit wishlist Nov 2012 #14
Yes, I had Justice Roberts "doctrine" on the ACA in the back of my mind when posting this. CTyankee Nov 2012 #17
I don't pay into SS as I'm a public employee in MO., I pay into PERS glacierbay Nov 2012 #18
While I am not dead set opposed to raising the cap Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #19
Without the cap, solvency of SS is assured rocktivity Nov 2012 #20
If an increase would draw a challenge, the same case could be made against the current cap TheKentuckian Nov 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can the cap on income sub...»Reply #12