HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Ed Schultz sounds like an...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Wed Nov 14, 2012, 01:53 PM

Ed Schultz sounds like an idiot right now... [View all]

...and "co-host" John Nichols isn't setting him straight!

Ed's saying that he disagrees with Harry Reid and that Reid should not change the filibuster rules: leave them as they are. OK, that's his opinion, it's just one that I disagree with. But the problem with his argument is that he thinks it's based on facts, when in fact, he's merely regurgitating conventional wisdom about the history of the filibuster. This shit is so readily available, you just have to be intellectually lazy not to research it.

1. Schultz: The filibuster was specifically designed to protect the voice of the minority.
FALSE: Political scientist Sarah Binder writes that the filibuster was a "happy accident" that wasn't even discovered for years:

"In 1805, Aaron Burr has just killed Alexander Hamilton. He comes back to the Senate and gives his farewell address. Burr basically says that you are a great body. You are conscientious and wise, you do not give in to the whims of passion. But your rules are a mess. And he goes through the rulebook pointing out duplicates and things that are unclear."

"Among his suggestions was to drop the previous question motion. And they pretty much just take Burr's advice. And once it's gone, it takes some time for leaders to realize that they can't cut off debate anymore. But the striking part to me was that we say the Senate developed the filibuster to protect minorities and the right to debate. That's hogwash! It's a mistake. Believe me, I would've loved to find the smoking gun where the Senate decides to create a deliberative body. But it takes years before anyone figures out that the filibuster has just been created."
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/03/how_the_filibuster_was_invente.html


2. Schultz: It's worked this way for generations, don't change it now.
FALSE: It's been change several times over the years, but most recently, and most germane to today's debate, it was changed in 2003 when the "phantom filibuster" was introduced. Many believe that this is a rule change that Reid is considering. Ed says, no, leave it as it's been for "generations."

As for his opinion, he believes that Americans have it all figured out and that the Republicans will fall off the face of the earth in the next two election cycles. So "Democratic" of him: Expect the best case scenario and live to regret not striking when you had the chance.

What happened to the tough guy?

29 replies, 3051 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 29 replies Author Time Post
Reply Ed Schultz sounds like an idiot right now... [View all]
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2012 OP
Puglover Nov 2012 #1
The Magistrate Nov 2012 #2
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2012 #5
The Magistrate Nov 2012 #12
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2012 #16
Bake Nov 2012 #29
TeamPooka Nov 2012 #3
regnaD kciN Nov 2012 #4
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2012 #9
still_one Nov 2012 #10
99Forever Nov 2012 #13
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2012 #15
ToxMarz Nov 2012 #19
Puzzledtraveller Nov 2012 #22
librechik Nov 2012 #6
still_one Nov 2012 #7
Zen Democrat Nov 2012 #8
still_one Nov 2012 #11
Anthony McCarthy Nov 2012 #14
Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2012 #17
Whisp Nov 2012 #18
DainBramaged Nov 2012 #20
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2012 #21
Cary Nov 2012 #23
kansasobama Nov 2012 #24
bluestate10 Nov 2012 #26
bluestate10 Nov 2012 #25
liberalmuse Nov 2012 #27
MjolnirTime Nov 2012 #28