Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Funny how the sexually attractive woman is the villain of the piece [View all]nichomachus
(12,754 posts)83. I can tell you exactly how it will shake out
There will be several months of kerfuffle. Lives and families will be torn apart. Careers will be ruined. The American public, whipped into a frenzy by the corporatist media, will have its eyes glued to the scandal. Then, one day, it will all suddenly disappear. The smoke will clear. And Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid will be gone.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Funny how the sexually attractive woman is the villain of the piece [View all]
cthulu2016
Nov 2012
OP
If she broke it off with Petraeus, why was she threatening the other woman... n/t
Lucinda
Nov 2012
#1
yes. she is a player. and no, she is not in a subservient role. the whole villian thing is
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#45
i really have no interest discussing my opinion with you. you do things like misrepresent
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#69
ah. a perfect example why i have no interest what so ever having a conversation with you. thank you
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#73
I think it's because you are not entirely clear on what a conversation is
4th law of robotics
Nov 2012
#74
thanks. lol. so will still sit back and wait, until we actually know. i thought it was still
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#40
what i am seeing, that i find fascinating, is dismissing her to role of mistress. there is nothing
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#2
there is not a single damn thing that puts her in a mistress role. that simple. nt
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#44
it would be a fact. not an opinion. so ya. look up mistress. by the very definition that is not
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#49
yes. games. then he would equally be a mastress, or a mister'ess. take your pick.
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#61
that is crap MM. she has a career, education, connection, and knows what she wants. she is not
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#13
again, i dont catagorize it as villians. but, i do not see a victim. or one playing a subservient,
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#71
and THIS you and i agree totally on, is the bottomline and you said very well. nt
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#79
All this time I thought it was the general, maybe we read different news sources (nt)
The Straight Story
Nov 2012
#17
You haven't a clue about what is in play here, do you? cthulu2016, there's a lot going on Full
bobthedrummer
Nov 2012
#18
Um, that's utterly predictable. See, History of Western Culture for the last several thousand years
Starry Messenger
Nov 2012
#37
I think she is 'a' villain, not 'the' villain. There are potentially a lot of villains here.
stevenleser
Nov 2012
#75