Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Funny how the sexually attractive woman is the villain of the piece [View all]Lucinda
(31,164 posts)1. If she broke it off with Petraeus, why was she threatening the other woman... n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Funny how the sexually attractive woman is the villain of the piece [View all]
cthulu2016
Nov 2012
OP
If she broke it off with Petraeus, why was she threatening the other woman... n/t
Lucinda
Nov 2012
#1
yes. she is a player. and no, she is not in a subservient role. the whole villian thing is
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#45
i really have no interest discussing my opinion with you. you do things like misrepresent
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#69
ah. a perfect example why i have no interest what so ever having a conversation with you. thank you
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#73
I think it's because you are not entirely clear on what a conversation is
4th law of robotics
Nov 2012
#74
thanks. lol. so will still sit back and wait, until we actually know. i thought it was still
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#40
what i am seeing, that i find fascinating, is dismissing her to role of mistress. there is nothing
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#2
there is not a single damn thing that puts her in a mistress role. that simple. nt
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#44
it would be a fact. not an opinion. so ya. look up mistress. by the very definition that is not
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#49
yes. games. then he would equally be a mastress, or a mister'ess. take your pick.
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#61
that is crap MM. she has a career, education, connection, and knows what she wants. she is not
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#13
again, i dont catagorize it as villians. but, i do not see a victim. or one playing a subservient,
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#71
and THIS you and i agree totally on, is the bottomline and you said very well. nt
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#79
All this time I thought it was the general, maybe we read different news sources (nt)
The Straight Story
Nov 2012
#17
You haven't a clue about what is in play here, do you? cthulu2016, there's a lot going on Full
bobthedrummer
Nov 2012
#18
Um, that's utterly predictable. See, History of Western Culture for the last several thousand years
Starry Messenger
Nov 2012
#37
I think she is 'a' villain, not 'the' villain. There are potentially a lot of villains here.
stevenleser
Nov 2012
#75