Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
11. K&R. Great read as its pretty wide ranging conversation about the weeks events.
Mon Nov 12, 2012, 05:39 PM
Nov 2012

I like this part (even though it isn't about Petraeus)...

"You write this week about the GOP's estrangement from reality on everything from climate change to polling data. Do you see any way back for them from Truthiness to truth?"


"No. Are the real powers in the GOP going to forswear the echo chamber of Fox News (no matter how much apostate conservatives like David Frum beg them to)? Are they really going to abandon think tanks like the American Enterprise Institute, analysts like Michael Barone, and pollsters like Rasmussen that tell them what they want to hear? Are they going to heed climate change science? Are they going to acknowledge that they don’t have just an “outreach” problem with minorities and women but policy problems that extend beyond the party’s harsh line on immigration (which is corrected easily)? I see no signs. Those who got this election wrong and whom I discuss in my “Fantasyland” piece — typified by Karl Rove and Peggy Noonan — aren’t really giving an inch. They are trapped in their own gated community of aging white America and don’t know how to even ask directions to venture beyond it into 21st-century America. Other Republican grandees are calling the defeat “narrow” or blaming it wholly on Romney’s moderation and inept campaign operation. Obama’s victory has only temporarily nicked the conservatives’ bubble, not burst it."

50 Shades of Grey: DC Pryderi Nov 2012 #1
Factor that in with six degrees of separation Fumesucker Nov 2012 #3
No kidding Canuckistanian Nov 2012 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author Pryderi Nov 2012 #26
This is a big deal. nt patrice Nov 2012 #2
Watching all of this unfold is going to be hifiguy Nov 2012 #4
I hated when they went after Clinton over sex and I hate this story too. Hamlette Nov 2012 #5
If Petraeus was screwing the hotel maid or his wife's friend, I'd agree TwilightGardener Nov 2012 #6
I haven't seen any evidence of that yet Hamlette Nov 2012 #13
I'm interested to find out why Eric Cantor knew in August and what he planned to do with that info. Indpndnt Nov 2012 #16
THIS^^ Canuckistanian Nov 2012 #24
This is more than a garden-variety affair. Monica wasn't privy to Clinton's e-mails, e.g. WinkyDink Nov 2012 #8
^^^ This Zoeisright Nov 2012 #19
I despise BetrayUs smaug Nov 2012 #20
Broadwell ambition Blue4Texas Nov 2012 #7
And isn't her surname interesting? WinkyDink Nov 2012 #9
Symbols reflected in a script she wrote LOL Blue4Texas Nov 2012 #15
If there were an emergency and all the hotels in the DC MineralMan Nov 2012 #10
K&R. Great read as its pretty wide ranging conversation about the weeks events. riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #11
Of course they have no intent 2naSalit Nov 2012 #17
If Rich thinks there a story Wellstone ruled Nov 2012 #12
She's being portayed as an 2naSalit Nov 2012 #14
The old 'nuts and sluts' formula for discrediting any woman Sheldon Cooper Nov 2012 #21
That's one of the first 2naSalit Nov 2012 #25
"...the unfortunately titled All In..." ljm2002 Nov 2012 #18
Can I add here: Stop appointing Republican darlings to be "Bi-Partisan"? ThoughtCriminal Nov 2012 #22
+1000. (•cough•StanMcChrystal•cough) bullwinkle428 Nov 2012 #27
It is interesting quaker bill Nov 2012 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Frank Rich: Petraeus Affa...»Reply #11