General Discussion

ancianita

(35,901 posts)

39. Dean has withdrawn from national politics, doesn't want the job.

Reply to Drew Richards (Reply #31)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 02:17 PM

Nov 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

89 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wanna make Rush Limbaugh crazier than he already is? [View all] Playinghardball Nov 2012 OP

Clinton/Warren in '16 madokie Nov 2012 #1

Nah. Warren has much more work to do in her new position before she runs on the WH ticket. HopeHoops Nov 2012 #4

It is 2016 or never for Warren, she would be 71 in 2020 krawhitham Nov 2012 #82

She doesn't look NEARLY old enough for that! HopeHoops Nov 2012 #85

madokie Diclotican Nov 2012 #34

Diclotican, Warren will be 67 in 2016. So might be the same situation. I'm hoping that freshwest Nov 2012 #47

freshwest Diclotican Nov 2012 #58

My bad madokie Nov 2012 #61

madokie Diclotican Nov 2012 #63

If the republiCONs don't get into a war amongst themselves madokie Nov 2012 #65

madokie Diclotican Nov 2012 #67

I would love to see Hillary run with a great young VP candidate.... Walk away Nov 2012 #2

Check your math. Hilary is currently 66. She will be 70 in 2016. kestrel91316 Nov 2012 #9

Life expectancy of white American women with college degrees is 83.9 years..... Bigmack Nov 2012 #14

Life expectency is not the same as being SheilaT Nov 2012 #21

This is true. Life Expectancy isn't the issue. nt Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #53

Biden is 69. deurbano Nov 2012 #57

Easy answer... Hilary ain't Raygun! He was a taco short of a combination plate on his best day! nt Bigmack Nov 2012 #64

+1 nt ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #46

Actually, she'll be just turning 69 during the 2016 election louis c Nov 2012 #27

8 years of Obama, 8 years of Hillary, and 8 years of her VP after that? Ter Nov 2012 #72

Sorry, I have no desire to see any Clintons in the WH........ kooljerk666 Nov 2012 #3

How about Chelsea? TlalocW Nov 2012 #8

Chelsea, ehh don't know her or anything about her........ kooljerk666 Nov 2012 #24

No dynasties! Not Hillary, not Chelsea truebluegreen Nov 2012 #42

How 'bout one of the Bush Twins if they were a democrat TlalocW Nov 2012 #60

No. truebluegreen Nov 2012 #66

time for new blood, the bush and clinton dynasty days are over. Whisp Nov 2012 #5

Limbaugh? SeattleVet Nov 2012 #6

clinton-michelle obama would certainly be an interesting combination JanT Nov 2012 #7

Yeah, but I doubt she'll run. progressoid Nov 2012 #10

How about Warren-Castro jimlup Nov 2012 #11

Love the sentiment, but Aldo Leopold Nov 2012 #12

Sorry, but the dynastic aspect of another Clinton in office just stops me Lionessa Nov 2012 #13

If she would run she would win...nt and-justice-for-all Nov 2012 #15

Just like in 2008. Fuddnik Nov 2012 #17

Circumstances are different now... and-justice-for-all Nov 2012 #74

How long is it between now and 2016? SheilaT Nov 2012 #76

You made a very good point Turborama Nov 2012 #80

I have been on DU since 2002, and I have watched this idiocy SheilaT Nov 2012 #83

Thinks SheliaT for your snark on the matter and-justice-for-all Nov 2012 #87

The way people here are always speculating SheilaT Nov 2012 #88

Yeah she got beat by an unknown in 2008 krawhitham Nov 2012 #84

Cuomo/Kane Kyad06 Nov 2012 #16

Cuomo vs Christie would be very interesting Kyad06 Nov 2012 #19

Christie will not be the Repub nominee. nt Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #55

Anti Union Cuomo -no thanks n/t n2doc Nov 2012 #25

Consider my Vote already cast for 2016 and beyond!!! Liberal In Red State Nov 2012 #18

Sure, Elizabeth Warren TroubleMan Nov 2012 #20

Clinton/Castro 2016 ancianita Nov 2012 #22

You beat me on this one ... Julian is a perfect VP choice. libdem4life Nov 2012 #33

Nah, put her on the Supreme Court . . . that'll really get his knickers in a twist. :) n/t ET Awful Nov 2012 #23

She's too old, now, many say. She'd be better in a position to nominate a Scalia replacement. ancianita Nov 2012 #35

Let's not put anyone much over 50 on the Supremes. Gidney N Cloyd Nov 2012 #36

Actually, since Supreme Court Justices are elected for life, SheilaT Nov 2012 #77

I do think we're better off if _Repubs_ put old folks on the court but our guys should stay awhile. Gidney N Cloyd Nov 2012 #86

You can't put two first ladies on a ticket. how about a Latino? craigmatic Nov 2012 #26

Why not? It's not as if there won't be two qualified ladies available. Is this some rule? ancianita Nov 2012 #37

No it's not a rule but it seems like political overreach to me. I like them both but it might seem craigmatic Nov 2012 #41

Why not? SheilaT Nov 2012 #68

It's not a matter of gender it's a matter of giving some new people a chance. craigmatic Nov 2012 #69

My point is that no one thinks there's anything wrong SheilaT Nov 2012 #71

I meant 2 first ladies. I don't care if 2 women democrats were the ticket next time. It'd probably craigmatic Nov 2012 #75

I think we cross posted. SheilaT Nov 2012 #78

Yeah, but when a first time comes (woman nominee), you can't do it twice Ter Nov 2012 #73

The one thing I can almost guarantee SheilaT Nov 2012 #28

+1 nt ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #48

A woman, yes. Island Blue Nov 2012 #29

Clinton-Devaul Patrick!!! 2016 Heather MC Nov 2012 #30

You want a serious ticket for 2016? how about Drew Richards Nov 2012 #31

Dean has withdrawn from national politics, doesn't want the job. ancianita Nov 2012 #39

I love Dean but he'd be 68 before he was sworn in. Gidney N Cloyd Nov 2012 #40

Elizabeth Warren 2016 Jackilope Nov 2012 #32

He would jump around his studio flinging shit at the rafters Rex Nov 2012 #38

Hilarious! I remember Rushbo's obsession with Hillary in the 90s. LongTomH Nov 2012 #43

K&R nt ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #44

No. Warren in 2016 because.... zentrum Nov 2012 #45

I don't know about that.It's the stuff they're made of..and I don't mean skin & genitalia.They r tuf judesedit Nov 2012 #52

I would love to see either scenario. They would be great for this country's future. judesedit Nov 2012 #49

Two words Anthony McCarthy Nov 2012 #50

Works for me! nt Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #51

Why should Democrats choose a Presidential candidate based in any way on what Rush Limbaugh thinks? PoliticAverse Nov 2012 #54

I was thinking the same thing. Loved reply #38, though Turborama Nov 2012 #81

I'm not sure Hillary is the right choice.... Wounded Bear Nov 2012 #56

Yes to Warren, but no to Hillary. Arugula Latte Nov 2012 #59

My gut says she won't run michigandem58 Nov 2012 #62

IF Rush survives 4 more years..... yellowcanine Nov 2012 #70

I am all for Hillary and will support her 100%! I voted for her in 2008 so I am hoping NYC Liberal Nov 2012 #79

think bigger! Angela Davis, Christiane Amanpour 2016! NuttyFluffers Nov 2012 #89