Reply #3

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 12:49 AM

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

19 replies	Author	Time	Post
Increasing taxes on the rich does not justify attacking Social Security. [View all]	woo me with science	Nov 2012	OP
There is absolutely no reason Social Security should ever be on the table at all.	RC	Nov 2012	#1
+100000	woo me with science	Nov 2012	#15
Can I have Social Security on the table to this extent?	Loudly	Nov 2012	#2
That works for me.	Lugnut	Nov 2012	#4
What you propose makes emminent sense because very few people make enought to even reach the	xtraxritical	Nov 2012	#8
That should be the only thing under consideration re: SS n/t	SickOfTheOnePct	Nov 2012	#18
I never heard Obama say anything about cutting SS.	CheapShotArtist	Nov 2012	#3
well, it probably wouldn't have been a good idea to say he was	quinnox	Nov 2012	#6
Remember his remark on Social Security in the first debate?	hay rick	Nov 2012	#11
The whole idea of taxing the rich	OnionPatch	Nov 2012	#5
I'm pretty sure the Archie Bunker types supported bu$h's wars	Art_from_Ark	Nov 2012	#14
The republicans are still refusing to raise taxes.	airplaneman	Nov 2012	#7
If SS is on the table...	Sophiegirl	Nov 2012	#9
IMHO I would like to see the conversation steered toward the fact that	fleabiscuit	Nov 2012	#10
SS is my work benefits and future retirement fund.	part man all 86	Nov 2012	#12
SS Trust Fund has $2.6 TRILLION surplus! Lift the $105K cap and it is solvent 4ever.	ErikJ	Nov 2012	#13
Kick	woo me with science	Nov 2012	#16
SS should be 100% off the table. I would be open to Medicaid/Medicare reform, though.	reformist2	Nov 2012	#17
Right again, woo me	PETRUS	Nov 2012	#19

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.