HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Uh-oh! Supremes to hear c... » Reply #6
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Response to theHandpuppet (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 04:54 PM

6. "The justices three years ago expressed skepticism . . ."

". . . about the continued need for Section 5 of the historic act."

Well, considering the number of times the DOJ has had to invalidate gerrymandering in several southern states in just the last two years, I'd say yes, there's a continued need.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 15 replies Author Time Post
theHandpuppet Nov 2012 OP
LiberalLoner Nov 2012 #1
Indydem Nov 2012 #2
theHandpuppet Nov 2012 #3
Indydem Nov 2012 #5
WinkyDink Nov 2012 #12
lonestarnot Nov 2012 #13
Indydem Nov 2012 #15
Geoff R. Casavant Nov 2012 #4
LiberalLoner Nov 2012 #9
LineNew Reply "The justices three years ago expressed skepticism . . ."
Geoff R. Casavant Nov 2012 #6
former9thward Nov 2012 #7
Geoff R. Casavant Nov 2012 #10
former9thward Nov 2012 #14
Scuba Nov 2012 #8
NYC Liberal Nov 2012 #11
Please login to view edit histories.