Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Bull! Rider3 Nov 2012 #1
Some are not yet ready to re-think their stand. Sheepshank Nov 2012 #2
Rather than be wrong :) Blue4Texas Nov 2012 #3
The expression "double down" WeekendWarrior Nov 2012 #37
+1000 nt ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #48
That and "meme." When did the word "theme" get replaced with "meme?" And why? Squinch Nov 2012 #57
Sure...what do you have in mind? Sheepshank Nov 2012 #64
Well, "double down" means WeekendWarrior Nov 2012 #66
Utter Nonsense Coyotl Nov 2012 #34
Perhaps re-reading the post might help... Faryn Balyncd Nov 2012 #36
Thank you...I thought I was reading a different post than everyone else. n/t ejbr Nov 2012 #59
You're missing his point. Jim Lane Nov 2012 #42
The operative word is "if" brush Nov 2012 #60
Thanks for posting this important warning from Harvey Wasserman. John1956PA Nov 2012 #4
I think this needs to be our number one priority flamingdem Nov 2012 #6
I appreciate your comment on the thread about the Repub's attempt to split PA's electoral vote block John1956PA Nov 2012 #14
This is exactly right, but since we have to push past the incredulousness of people on the left flamingdem Nov 2012 #29
Problems (and fraud) SHOULD be fixed. But Obama hit 270 BEFORE Ohio was called. Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #56
I can see that. How did anyone get suckered into going with those machines anyway? brewens Nov 2012 #58
Further proof that conspiracy theories never die RomneyLies Nov 2012 #5
What is BBV? flamingdem Nov 2012 #7
"Black Box Voting" the moniker put on this CT back after Kerry lost. nt RomneyLies Nov 2012 #9
Bingo! Such crapola from the CTists. stopbush Nov 2012 #10
As bad as Truthers, Birthers, poll unskewers, and moon landing deniers, IMO n/t RomneyLies Nov 2012 #12
Not to mention the JFK CTists. stopbush Nov 2012 #15
Agreed. Lee Harvey Oswald shared something with Charles Whitman RomneyLies Nov 2012 #17
Post removed Post removed Nov 2012 #18
+1, HOK. Mc Mike Nov 2012 #38
Indded Just Like They Were Made For Each Other HangOnKids Nov 2012 #43
I was almost afraid to note the similarity, it sounds so 'conspiratorial'. Nt. Mc Mike Nov 2012 #47
The deniers of BBV ? RobertEarl Nov 2012 #13
Rec. PowerToThePeople Nov 2012 #23
I agree. There is a contingent on the left who likes to attack attempts to protect voting integrity flamingdem Nov 2012 #27
Maybe they're not as "left" as they'd wish us to believe? Doremus Nov 2012 #44
I don't think anyone denies the need for a paper audit trail. moriah Nov 2012 #31
2 elections actually. PowerToThePeople Nov 2012 #33
Many of us came to DU after '04 for that very reason, P2P. Doremus Nov 2012 #45
I'm glad you had a good experience. Doremus Nov 2012 #46
As I said, most DUers (including yourself from this post) reject the idea.... moriah Nov 2012 #50
I was a poll worker in '04. Doremus Nov 2012 #61
They let campaigns even do the work out there? moriah Nov 2012 #63
You embarrass yourself equating those who want a verifiable vote flamingdem Nov 2012 #30
Yeah well if "Ifs" and "Buts" were candy and nuts... cherish44 Nov 2012 #8
didn't Nate just say we did not need Ohio and Florida (combined) this time? eom amborin Nov 2012 #11
no we did not. As soon as they called colorado and nevada, it was a done deal. sammytko Nov 2012 #16
The Patriots would have won the Super Bowl had they scored more points than the Giants! Johonny Nov 2012 #19
+1 ProfessorGAC Nov 2012 #22
This is seriously stupid cthulu2016 Nov 2012 #20
And it's not difficult to separate the two flamingdem Nov 2012 #24
Once you have motive, opportunity, and know way to verify how does it matter? TheKentuckian Nov 2012 #62
Here's a good overview of what happened plus sources to check out flamingdem Nov 2012 #21
Ummm.....arithmetic? Tommy_Carcetti Nov 2012 #25
But it didn't. bigwillq Nov 2012 #26
But you better believe that next time flamingdem Nov 2012 #28
Nothing to see here Citizens! Please move along! bleever Nov 2012 #32
And if it all came down to California we'd have a Democratic House Retrograde Nov 2012 #35
+1. Thanks fd, and Freepress. nt. Mc Mike Nov 2012 #39
Very welcome flamingdem Nov 2012 #41
Whatever anyone thinks THERE MUST BE A PAPER BALLOT TRAIL jsmirman Nov 2012 #40
I think there's a real possibility that Ohio WAS rigged by the Republicans. Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #49
But he didn't, so who gives a fuck? Scootaloo Nov 2012 #51
nope. florida results are official. ohio was nice but not needed tjwash Nov 2012 #52
Romney also could've won if more people would've voted for him. phleshdef Nov 2012 #53
There they go again. No, that's not the truth. Obama didn't NEED Ohio to win. CO brought it home. Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #54
Such a bunch of cry babies. We won by over 3 million votes - TBF Nov 2012 #55
I totally agree with Howler Nov 2012 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Romney would have won if ...»Reply #32