Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
43. ''Thus died the American Dream...''
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 12:47 PM
Oct 2012

The results of Trickle Down Economics is the transfer of wealth from those who produce it to those who don't.



Income Gaps Between Very Rich and Everyone Else More Than Tripled In Last Three Decades, New Data Show

By Arloc Sherman and Chad Stone
June 25, 2010

The gaps in after-tax income between the richest 1 percent of Americans and the middle and poorest fifths of the country more than tripled between 1979 and 2007 (the period for which these data are available), according to data the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued last week. Taken together with prior research, the new data suggest greater income concentration at the top of the income scale than at any time since 1928.

While the recession that began in December 2007 likely reduced the income of the wealthiest Americans substantially and may thereby shrink the income gap between rich and poor households, a similar development that occurred around the bursting of the dot.com bubble and the 2001 recession turned out to be just a speed bump. Incomes at the top more than made up the lost ground from 2003 to 2005.

The new CBO data — the most comprehensive data available on changes in incomes and taxes for different income groups — also show the following:

In 2007, the share of after-tax income going to the top 1 percent hit its highest level (17.1 percent) since 1979, while the share going to the middle one-fifth of Americans shrank to its lowest level during this period (14.1 percent).

Between 1979 and 2007, average after-tax incomes for the top 1 percent rose by 281 percent after adjusting for inflation — an increase in income of $973,100 per household — compared to increases of 25 percent ($11,200 per household) for the middle fifth of households and 16 percent ($2,400 per household) for the bottom fifth (see Figure 1).

If all groups’ after-tax incomes had grown at the same percentage rate over the 1979-2007 period, middle-income households would have received an additional $13,042 in 2007 and families in the bottom fifth would have received an additional $6,010.

In 2007, the average household in the top 1 percent had an income of $1.3 million, up $88,800 just from the prior year; this $88,800 gain is well above the total 2007 income of the average middle-income household ($55,300). (1)


CONTINUED...

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3220



"It's like the Depression never happened. Unlike then, though, the American people of 2012 had no FDR to straighten the mess out."
Friedman and his laissaez-fairytalism was just what the corporate-fascists were byeya Oct 2012 #1
A total failure for the nation and the 99-percent. Octafish Oct 2012 #2
You're welcome; but, you deserve the credit in bringing this little reported fact - a life byeya Oct 2012 #9
Sadly, today's Republicans are even worse than Friedman. NYC Liberal Oct 2012 #14
k&r Starry Messenger Oct 2012 #3
Thank you for the heads-up. Incredible. Octafish Oct 2012 #13
who was the latin-looking guy after friedman? HiPointDem Oct 2012 #23
Adnan Khashoggi--Iran/Contra guy. Starry Messenger Oct 2012 #25
thanks. HiPointDem Oct 2012 #38
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Oct 2012 #4
You are welcome, Uncle Joe! Didya see this about Sanford Weill? Octafish Oct 2012 #21
I thought Uncle Joe Oct 2012 #22
It was no accident. They learned how to pull it off during the S&L debacle. Octafish Oct 2012 #24
People who liked this ... GeorgeGist Oct 2012 #5
Great intellect, hers... Octafish Oct 2012 #31
kick for truth Blue_Tires Oct 2012 #6
Economic Domination IS Political Octafish Oct 2012 #41
According to Wikipedia Stainless Oct 2012 #7
David Stockman, Pruneface Budget Director, said the wealth transfer was political... Octafish Oct 2012 #42
50 years from now, wonder what economic historians will say? JackN415 Oct 2012 #8
''Thus died the American Dream...'' Octafish Oct 2012 #43
Monetary fascism = worse than traditional fascism... HiPointDem Oct 2012 #10
That's as good an explanation as I've ever seen: Thanks. The financial byeya Oct 2012 #11
For roughly 20 years after WWII this nation built up enormous equity. Over the next 30 years Egalitarian Thug Oct 2012 #15
The other term I've seen bandied about is "friendly fascism." Selatius Oct 2012 #28
This sentence, "...uses the powers of the state to put the interest of money and the financial class Egalitarian Thug Oct 2012 #12
A brilliant article - thanks Octafish. hifiguy Oct 2012 #16
this is why the EU is failing: They put the demands of the banks above the needs of people. librechik Oct 2012 #17
The EU also needs a treasury and the individual nations need to be able to adjust byeya Oct 2012 #20
K&R#23 n/t, Sir! bobthedrummer Oct 2012 #18
I call it economic terrorism. Initech Oct 2012 #19
Govts need to use the military to take over banks, before the banksters buy their military, too. WinkyDink Oct 2012 #26
Friedman has been discredited in nearly every country but the US. laundry_queen Oct 2012 #27
Friedman was big in Pinochet's Chile - It was a natural fit, imo. byeya Oct 2012 #39
One quibble with the excerpt........ socialist_n_TN Oct 2012 #29
Yes, FDR saved the capitalists' bacon and got their hatred in return. It would byeya Oct 2012 #40
One concept that sticks... AntiFascist Oct 2012 #30
Leo Strauss is one of those ironies thrown up by history. hifiguy Oct 2012 #34
This entire thread is MUST READ stuff! ... My thanks to all of the contributors. Bozita Oct 2012 #32
K&R woo me with science Oct 2012 #33
thank you Octafish... tex-wyo-dem Oct 2012 #35
K&R. Kurovski Oct 2012 #36
K & R HCE SuiGeneris Oct 2012 #37
First post.. Ron O Nov 2012 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Dark Age of Money: Mi...»Reply #43