Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(5,823 posts)

28. I am curious to know why the Boston Globe wants this information.

Thu Oct 25, 2012, 06:57 AM

Oct 2012

Perhaps it small piece of a bigger story they are working on.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Will this Allred/Romney/Sternberg divorce thing go anyhere? [View all] TheCowsCameHome Oct 2012 OP

No brooklynite Oct 2012 #1

No. WinkyDink Oct 2012 #2

No. (nt) enough Oct 2012 #3

I'm starting to have my doubts. randome Oct 2012 #4

Waste of energy. The election is over Dkc05 Oct 2012 #5

It depends on the testimony. madaboutharry Oct 2012 #7

If the courts allow them to talk yes. The issue is perjury. hrmjustin Oct 2012 #8

I believe I read 4 weeks. hrmjustin Oct 2012 #10

Lying under oath: IOKIYAR. kestrel91316 Oct 2012 #20

No and not with the current Dem strategists kansasobama Oct 2012 #11

I gotta ask, kansaaobama, why you Cha Oct 2012 #25

No. Shrike47 Oct 2012 #12

Magic 8 Ball says "Outlook not so good". n/t cherokeeprogressive Oct 2012 #13

we know more tomorrow riverwalker Oct 2012 #14

No chance budkin Oct 2012 #15

Nope. femmocrat Oct 2012 #17

No. EOM ProudProgressiveNow Oct 2012 #18

You mean the RMONEY PERJURY thing?? kestrel91316 Oct 2012 #19

Nope n/t doc03 Oct 2012 #21

I'd like to see what they have like the transcripts aint_no_life_nowhere Oct 2012 #22

Nope.. SoCalDem Oct 2012 #26

Nope. geek_sabre Oct 2012 #27

I am curious to know why the Boston Globe wants this information. Glimmer of Hope Oct 2012 #28