Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Im tired of Candy Crowley getting props on the debate. She fucked up big IMO. [View all]Spazito
(50,277 posts)3. No, she didn't "fuck up"...
Romney's lie dealt specifically with what the President did or did not say in the Rose Garden the day after the attack. Romney tried to say the President was lying when he said he called it a terrorist attack at that time, that the President didn't say it was a terrorist attack until 14 days later.
Crowley was actually in attendance, as a member of the press, for that Rose Garden appearance and stated the fact that the President DID state the attack was "an act of terror" at that time.
You, not Candy Crowley, have the facts wrong as do the repubs.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Im tired of Candy Crowley getting props on the debate. She fucked up big IMO. [View all]
GusFring
Oct 2012
OP
Your concern is noted. Please feel free to share more of your concerns, and enjoy your stay. nt
msanthrope
Oct 2012
#1
I agree. She could've left it at "he did call it a terrorist act", but instead chose to make up
Marr
Oct 2012
#2
You're going to have to flesh that out a bit more. DU is a little weary of trolls. Prove you aren't.
HopeHoops
Oct 2012
#6
Sorry I don't have 40k post. I have no desire to reach that milestone. Crowley sux and always has.
GusFring
Oct 2012
#12
Thanks. We all started at post #1 at some point. We've just been getting invaded lately...
HopeHoops
Oct 2012
#14
That wasn't my intent. I was trying to avoid a hidden thread for that supposition.
HopeHoops
Oct 2012
#19
See my reply #19. I obviously worded the "prove" part wrong. I was just looking out for the poster.
HopeHoops
Oct 2012
#20
Your post was accusatory and aggressive. "Prove you aren't" and "this one smells of troll"
Romulox
Oct 2012
#21
You have to choose your battles, no need to go after someone who helped us more than she hurt
Bjorn Against
Oct 2012
#9
It was supposed to be a *FOREIGN POLICY* debate. She let it become a domestic one.
Romulox
Oct 2012
#17
I disagree, it would enhance the neutrality of the moderator and keep the discussion...
Spazito
Oct 2012
#28
The ridiculous parsing of whether "an act of terror" means a 'terrorist attack'...
Spazito
Oct 2012
#30