Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PurityOfEssence

(13,150 posts)
43. Send the Marines
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 01:01 AM
Jan 2012

When someone makes a move
Of which we don't approve,
Who is it that always intervenes?
U.N. and O.A.S.,
They have their place, I guess,
But first send the Marines!

We'll send them all we've got,
John Wayne and Randolph Scott,
Remember those exciting fighting scenes?
To the shores of Tripoli,
But not to Mississippoli,

What do we do? We send the Marines!
For might makes right,
And till they've seen the light,
They've got to be protected,
All their rights respected,
'Till someone we like can be elected.

Members of the corps
All hate the thought of war,
They'd rather kill them off by peaceful means.
Stop calling it aggression,
O we hate that expression.
We only want the world to know
That we support the status quo.
They love us everywhere we go,
So when in doubt,
Send the Marines!

Tom Lehrer: a national treasure

Or a way to threaten its neighbors. Something it has a long history of doing. onenote Jan 2012 #1
When was the last time Iran attacked one of its neighbors? Hugabear Jan 2012 #3
Iran has used proxies to wage war for decades now. Ikonoklast Jan 2012 #9
So has the United States Hugabear Jan 2012 #16
I thought we were talking about Iran. Ikonoklast Jan 2012 #19
And Israel has been waging a real war against Palestinians for even longer Hugabear Jan 2012 #22
Plus didn't Israel Shankapotomus Jan 2012 #82
You can't talk about Iran like that surfdog Jan 2012 #33
On the contrary, a nuclear Iran isn't good for anyone metalbot Jan 2012 #90
Wrong. Hezbollah was created by Israel when they invaded Lebanon and didn't leave eridani Jan 2012 #62
Hezbollah "even have Sunday Mass on their cable TV station." Leopolds Ghost Jan 2012 #116
Just pointing out that Hezbolla has a real community base eridani Jan 2012 #121
Oh my, no I could not say the Qouts force has been involved nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #60
It also has a history of having its government overthrown by the USA n/t arcane1 Jan 2012 #8
Yes, but Mossadegh's administration was a legitimate gov't that was WRONGLY targeted........ AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #67
regardless, Iran does have a constitutional elected republic. Leopolds Ghost Jan 2012 #117
I dunno about the "constitutional" and "elected" part. Selatius Jan 2012 #119
Incorrect. matmar Jan 2012 #11
No, but the Iranians would sure as hell try the minute they got one. nt AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #68
Are you sure you aren't confusing Iran with Israel? Puregonzo1188 Jan 2012 #101
Your post falls squarely within the proud progressive tradition of arguing for nuclear proliferation RZM Jan 2012 #2
I don't approve of anyone having nukes, but I still agree with the OP. HopeHoops Jan 2012 #5
I do feel America and Israel to blame for Iran's alleged desire to pursue nuclear weapons Cali_Democrat Jan 2012 #6
Iran's reasons for wanting the bomb are similar to those of other nations RZM Jan 2012 #10
Last time I checked it wasn't a theocratic regime that actually used nukes.. matmar Jan 2012 #13
So let me get this straight RZM Jan 2012 #14
Strawman, non sequitur matmar Jan 2012 #18
No RZM Jan 2012 #25
Half-wit is correct fascisthunter Jan 2012 #38
Is the tone of your post meant to imply that Iran isn't to be allowed to "want" as do other nations? LooseWilly Jan 2012 #74
We've been through this many times RZM Jan 2012 #89
This doesn't explain your apparent self-delineation from the "left" LooseWilly Jan 2012 #91
Unfortunately RZM Jan 2012 #93
Sure, Iran WAS peaceful.........under Mossadegh. And look what happened to him. AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #95
Unfortunately we seem to be living in bizarro world Motown_Johnny Jan 2012 #24
and Yours Once again is Right Wing Reactionary fascisthunter Jan 2012 #37
That makes little sense RZM Jan 2012 #41
oh, is that your true motive fascisthunter Jan 2012 #48
Tell me. What's your preferred weapon when hunting fascists? RZM Jan 2012 #50
nib nub dur fascisthunter Jan 2012 #51
most likely cheetos. dionysus Jan 2012 #56
My my sir, you have certainly struck a mighty blow against fascist hunters!... LooseWilly Jan 2012 #77
Wow, thanks for that fascinating statement. joshcryer Jan 2012 #44
Thanks RZM Jan 2012 #45
Oops, sorry, not being sarcastic. It really does express something I couldn't put my finger on. joshcryer Jan 2012 #46
Hehe RZM Jan 2012 #47
A conservative Theocracy can still be a Nationalist representation... LooseWilly Jan 2012 #78
That's sort of how I feel about it. Iraq was the stabilizing factor in that region. HopeHoops Jan 2012 #4
"military invasion from the warmongering American empire" pinto Jan 2012 #7
We would be stupid to not stop them. onehandle Jan 2012 #12
Maybe we could instigate a coup.....oh wait.. matmar Jan 2012 #15
They're just as stupid as any other backward country that is run by a theocracy slackmaster Jan 2012 #17
Ah....what?? matmar Jan 2012 #20
I mis-read your subject line originally as saying they would be stupid TO develop an atomic weapon slackmaster Jan 2012 #30
Post removed Post removed Jan 2012 #79
Pardon me for erring by assuming that the idea suggested in the OP's subject line was sane. slackmaster Jan 2012 #92
But..but...we would never actually use our nuclear weapons on innocent people...oh, wait. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2012 #21
"Innocent people?" MicaelS Jan 2012 #28
So, all those evil women and children deserved to be incinerated? Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2012 #31
"Deserved"? No, but THEIR government started the war MicaelS Jan 2012 #34
By that measure, if the Vietnamese had nuked San Francisco it would have been OK. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2012 #36
Oooops! You can hand MicaelS's head back to him now. Bonobo Jan 2012 #57
Thank you. nt AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #70
Well called sir.. spot on LooseWilly Jan 2012 #80
True Bonobo Jan 2012 #84
If the Vietnamese had the capability to nuke San Francisco, that would've been their prerogative Hippo_Tron Jan 2012 #113
So I guess you think 9/11 was really swell too? Puregonzo1188 Jan 2012 #107
Amazing! Wind Dancer Jan 2012 #29
Iran would be stupid to develop a nuke. Muskypundit Jan 2012 #23
I certainly do hope that the Iranian people would be able to oust these horrible bastards..... AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #66
Yes, because proliferation of nuclear weapons is a big progressive value LeftishBrit Jan 2012 #26
LOL. Apparently Liechtenstein already has one . . . RZM Jan 2012 #27
Send the Marines PurityOfEssence Jan 2012 #43
Fuck yeah! Lets encourage everyone to have nukes! Ohio Joe Jan 2012 #32
Hmmmm... EX500rider Jan 2012 #35
Iran has Had to Have Known it was a Target... fascisthunter Jan 2012 #39
Nukes are undoubtedly a deterrent against rival states fujiyama Jan 2012 #40
"Sees itself surrounded"? Jeebus. How about "They really ARE surrounded!" eridani Jan 2012 #69
That's what the poster said. "Sees itself surrounded" TransitJohn Jan 2012 #73
Oh, OK. n/t eridani Jan 2012 #75
Look what happened to Hussein and Qaddafi PurityOfEssence Jan 2012 #42
The idea of the only country with a history of dropping nukes on civilians tells others Bonobo Jan 2012 #49
Nobody's disupting that the US killed alot of people with the atomic bombs in 1945 RZM Jan 2012 #54
Undoubtedly, Iran wants to be the next......or one of the next. AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #65
Ok, assuming Iran even intends to develop nuclear weapons, which isn't given, and can bomb Haifa... LooseWilly Jan 2012 #81
I can't help but think the oil companies are actually going to side with Iran, if possible. AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #98
Certainly good protection for presidents/dictators but don't do much for real people. North Korea pampango Jan 2012 #52
And I believe they would rejoice once Iran gets its first nukes. AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #99
It is not just an insurance policy, it is THE insurance policy. Fool Count Jan 2012 #53
It's really not an insurance policy at all stevenleser Jan 2012 #58
If that was the case, US would not care if Iran had nuclear weapons Fool Count Jan 2012 #76
You are mixing several things up. stevenleser Jan 2012 #94
That's you who are confused. Both of your points Fool Count Jan 2012 #96
Worked very well for North Korea. ZombieHorde Jan 2012 #55
No, it didn't. There were never any plans to invade North Korea. stevenleser Jan 2012 #59
Your timeline is off nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #61
"Worked well for North Korea"n politicians/family of dictators; not so well for NK people. pampango Jan 2012 #88
North Korea already had conventional weapons to serioulsy hurt Tokyo and Seoul Hippo_Tron Jan 2012 #114
I'm sorry, but please STFU and wake up to reality. AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #63
This is utter nonsense eridani Jan 2012 #71
It's not the nukes themselves, you are correct. However, it IS the intent which is the threat...... AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #100
Right. And I have stated a desire to date Robert Redford eridani Jan 2012 #103
I have no respect for the Israeli extreme right...... AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #105
Oh, get real! eridani Jan 2012 #106
And that's why I would rather see peaceful revolution in that nation instead of war. nt AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #109
We don't believe in nuclear proliferation Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2012 #64
OMFG! They're THREATENING all the military bases we have them surrounded with! eridani Jan 2012 #72
"retain" an even-tempered adult as president? LooseWilly Jan 2012 #83
You can't be president without swearing allegiance to the military-industrial complex eridani Jan 2012 #97
I actually agree with most of this....... AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #108
The fundie government has been in power since 1979 eridani Jan 2012 #110
They just haven't had the chance yet. Saddam beat them to it once. AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #111
Unsubstantiated opinion, period. eridani Jan 2012 #112
Well, the part about Iran not having invaded anyone since 1829 is true.... AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #120
Even fundies understand nuclear obliteration eridani Jan 2012 #122
Well..... AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #123
Regardless of starting from different premises-- eridani Jan 2012 #124
I don't care if they get the bomb Mudoria Jan 2012 #85
I don't think they need to be told that, it's pretty much understood Hippo_Tron Jan 2012 #115
I think all nations should have them, especially if they are rich with resources, as a detterent got root Jan 2012 #86
Sure they would madokie Jan 2012 #87
Don't forget that Israel has one as well. Puregonzo1188 Jan 2012 #102
I wonder what the response would be if the discussion were on Israel's right to have the bomb n/t Leopolds Ghost Jan 2012 #118
Israel's getting tense, wants one in self-defense. The Lord's our shepherd, says the Psalm, slackmaster Jan 2012 #125
Frankly, I wish Israeli didn't have nukes either. AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #126
K'd & R'd! DeathToTheOil Jan 2012 #104
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Iran would be stupid not ...»Reply #43