Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

GDoyle

(260 posts)

10. He Could Object

Reply to berni_mccoy (Original post)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 08:53 AM

Oct 2012

But he'd probably lose anyways and then looks like there is something he is afraid of. He had no choice but to respond, he was served. So saying no problem lets him spin it as "nothing to see here"

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WOW. Romney OKs Unsealing of Divorce Records. [View all] berni_mccoy Oct 2012 OP

So, what's the story, then? Why do we care? n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #1

Supposedly, she's also trying to get a gag order lifted Autumn Colors Oct 2012 #3

I guess we'll find out today. n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #22

Perhaps, Perjury? That would be a good one. CBGLuthier Oct 2012 #4

Yes, if on record. n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #24

If Willard severely misrepresented the shares she received, that's an issue. Indpndnt Oct 2012 #14

Hmm, interesting... n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #26

Two thieves helping each other. TheCowsCameHome Oct 2012 #2

LOL, that is funny but true. southernyankeebelle Oct 2012 #32

I don't think he can legally object.... Jeff In Milwaukee Oct 2012 #5

right CitizenPatriot Oct 2012 #18

He's going all in, hoping that---as the poster above shows---nobody will care that Romney PERJURED WinkyDink Oct 2012 #6

Considering the male support for R's...conspiring to defraud an ex-spouse HereSince1628 Oct 2012 #7

But could always turn some of those dum...er Undecided ladies into angry badgers. nc4bo Oct 2012 #12

Guess he'd rather have those unsealed than us be hounding him for his tax returns. n/t woodsprite Oct 2012 #8

His lawyer is getting ahead of the story mmonk Oct 2012 #9

Exactly. Get it out, hope to get it over. Pretend that "it's an old story" that means nothing. WinkyDink Oct 2012 #11

He Could Object GDoyle Oct 2012 #10

Expect Stemberg to object vehemently dems_rightnow Oct 2012 #13

I don't think most voters will care if Romney lied about the value of some stock. BenzoDia Oct 2012 #15

Just another one of Mitt's lies. No problem. Who cares. Is that what you're really saying?.... OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #23

Well certainly it's a hideous issue and would sink him in a sane world. BenzoDia Oct 2012 #30

Mitt is trying to appear publicly unconcerned by taking the high road and not objecting to.... OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #16

look cooperative publicly alc Oct 2012 #17

the fact that he is mentioning, means there is something there... trailmonkee Oct 2012 #19

it reinforces an image BelieveMe3 Oct 2012 #20

Lol. And. what about unsealing those tax returns? ananda Oct 2012 #21

This won't get far unless it is linked to the tax issues raised by Harry Reid malaise Oct 2012 #25

Romney is betting it will go right over the heads of his.... Bonhomme Richard Oct 2012 #27

Romney's feelings on whether his testimony should be unseal is irrelevant AngryAmish Oct 2012 #28

Isn't the Boston Globe involved in this somehow too? Liberalynn Oct 2012 #29

The Boston Globe IS THE PARTY REQUESTING the unsealing. WinkyDink Oct 2012 #31

Rmoney hopes that Blueprogress Oct 2012 #33