Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)"It was tone deaf, condescending, out of touch... The phrase objectified & dehumanized women" [View all]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/oct/17/romney-binders-full-of-womenMitt Romney's binders full of women just don't stack up
GOP candidate fumbles when asked about fair hiring practices for women, and the internet seizes its newest sensation
Emma G Keller
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 16 October 2012 23.54 EDT
Mitt Romney discusses 'binders full of women' in Tuesday's debate Link to this video
In the second presidential debate, women's issues finally came up. And Mitt Romney had an opportunity to show female voters he cared. But from his bullying of moderator Candy Crowley to his dismissive description of his hiring practices, he fumbled the chance. "Binders full of women," his badly chosen phrase became the meme of the night and will likely haunt him past Halloween. Here's a deconstruction of what he had to say about women.
An important topic, and one which I learned a great deal about, particularly as I was serving as governor of my state, because I had the chance to pull together a cabinet and all the applicants seemed to be men.
Seemed to be? Implausible from the start, they either were or they weren't.
And I and I went to my staff, and I said, "How come all the people for these jobs are are all men." They said: "Well, these are the people that have the qualifications."
This is hard to believe. Romney was talking about 2003 not 1893. Plenty of women would have been properly qualified.
And I said: "Well, gosh, can't we can't we find some some women that are also qualified?"
Patronizing.
And and so we we took a concerted effort to go out and find women who had backgrounds that could be qualified to become members of our cabinet. I went to a number of women's groups and said: "Can you help us find folks," and they brought us whole binders full of women.
ZING! There was the shot through his foot. "Binders full of women" became #bindersfullofwomen on Twitter, a Tumblr page and a Facebook page which within half an hour had over 20,000 likes. By the end of the debate that had risen to almost 70,000. Why did the phrase resonate? Because it was tone deaf, condescending and out of touch with the actual economic issues that women are so bothered about. The phrase objectified and dehumanized women. It played right into the perception that so many women have feared about a Romney administration that a president Romney would be sexist and set women back. And it turns out the way Romney presented it that he asked for a study of women in leadership positions wasn't true anyway.
MORE
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
19 replies, 3602 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (43)
ReplyReply to this post
19 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"It was tone deaf, condescending, out of touch... The phrase objectified & dehumanized women" [View all]
Hissyspit
Oct 2012
OP
I can see why there would be a shortage of women applying to work for the Romny governor's offic
Meandering1
Oct 2012
#10
And then doubled down with the "flexible work schedule", so they could go home and make dinner!
bullwinkle428
Oct 2012
#17