Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "No discernible difference" between Obama and Romney in many issues, Greenwald says [View all]freetrucker53
(36 posts)41. He was right
When it comes to trade agreements like TPP, Korea, and others, bet they won't be mentioned by either candidate including Biden or Ryan. The American people, conservative and liberal don't like the free trade agreements that have helped create our bad economic situation, but the politicians don't care. Remember who got NAFTA and Most Favored Nation for China pushed through?
A democrat, Bill Clinton.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"No discernible difference" between Obama and Romney in many issues, Greenwald says [View all]
Blue Yorker
Oct 2012
OP
No shit! The next Presidential term could see a dramatic remaking of the SCOTUS.
Raster
Oct 2012
#53
Libertarian Greenwald's strategy is to peel progressive votes from Obama in any way possible
struggle4progress
Oct 2012
#2
Greenwald, also a resident of Rio de Janeiro, is a "Libertarian" soon to become an Archipelagian . .
patrice
Oct 2012
#6
No: I described the man's motives and behavior, with supporting links
struggle4progress
Oct 2012
#23
After the 2010 election Greenwald expressed hope Democrats suffer the same fate in 2012:
struggle4progress
Oct 2012
#27
"Even though I know that by abstaining or supporting a third party, I’m going to be sacrificing
struggle4progress
Oct 2012
#42
If you can't be bothered to follow provided links, don't complain about the quality of excerpts
struggle4progress
Oct 2012
#44
I don't trust Glenn Greenwald. Why do people assume he is a Liberal? because he defends neo-Nazis???
patrice
Oct 2012
#4
Patrice, anyone who is not a civil libertarian is an authoritarian. There is no middle ground
TheKentuckian
Oct 2012
#60
There were a bunch of us around MoveOn who began to worry about an influx of "peace"
patrice
Oct 2012
#18
No discernable difference between Glen and a tree stump.. tho a tree stump is useful. nt
progressivebydesign
Oct 2012
#17
Hey, Tweety, I didn't know you posted here. How's that meltdown coming along? nt.
OldDem2012
Oct 2012
#26
His objective is "to allow credible third-party candidates into the presidential debates and to give
struggle4progress
Oct 2012
#49
Glenn didn't think that election mattered, so he actually didn't bother to vote in it
struggle4progress
Oct 2012
#37
Greenwald is a douche...moving on. Romney said he'd kill Big Bird; Obama would not.
vaberella
Oct 2012
#35
Medicare. Obamacare. Tax policy. LGBT rights. Reproductive health care rights. Supreme Court.
Warren Stupidity
Oct 2012
#51
He's a libertarian: his basic strategy is to piss on whoever's in office, in hopes
struggle4progress
Oct 2012
#62