Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Cheat sheet" is a loser [View all]railsback
(1,881 posts)37. Why did he need a hanky?
Did anyone see him use it? And just because Obama wasn't a DICK in the debate doesn't mean he did horrible. Quite the contrary. If Obama lost a lot of support, and from what the polls tell us taken after the debate that that isn't the case by a long shot, then there might be some validity. I don't want to see the President get into a tit-for-tat zinger competition. He's the leader of the country. He was statesmanlike. He wasn't going to play in the mud. Romnuts is paying for it now.
Quit playing checkers. That's what rednecks do.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I agree. It's unprovable so we should move on to all the other openings Romney gave us.
randome
Oct 2012
#29
I bet Romney banked his own blood and transfused it shortly before the debate
Nye Bevan
Oct 2012
#13
I agree. Romney didn't win because of a "cheat sheet". He won because the Prez was off his game.
scheming daemons
Oct 2012
#21
Agreed...cheat sheet almost sounds like Rove's way of countering positive job numbers
alcibiades_mystery
Oct 2012
#36