Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
4. Here:
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 10:27 AM
Oct 2012
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You know, I suspect that on Social Security, we've got a somewhat similar position. Social Security is structurally sound. It's going to have to be tweaked the way it was by Ronald Reagan and Speaker — Democratic Speaker Tip O'Neill. But it is — the basic structure is sound. But — but I want to talk about the values behind Social Security and Medicare and then talk about Medicare, because that's the big driver —

MR. LEHRER: Sure — it — you bet.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: — of our deficits right now.

You know, my grandmother, some of you know, helped to raise me. My grandparents did. My grandfather died awhile back. My grandmother died three days before I was elected president. And she was fiercely independent. She worked her way up, only had a high school education, started as a secretary, ended up being the vice president of a local bank. And she ended up living alone by choice. And the reason she could be independent was because of Social Security and Medicare. She had worked all her life, put in this money and understood that there was a basic guarantee, a floor under which she could not go.

And that's the perspective I bring when I think about what's called entitlements. You know, the name itself implies some sense of dependency on the part of these folks. These are folks who've worked hard, like my grandmother. And there are millions of people out there who are counting on this.

So my approach is to say, how do we strengthen the system over the long term? And in Medicare, what we did was we said, we are going to have to bring down the costs if we're going to deal with our long- term deficits, but to do that, let's look where some of the money is going. Seven hundred and sixteen billion dollars we were able to save from the Medicare program by no longer overpaying insurance companies, by making sure that we weren't overpaying providers.

And using that money, we were actually able to lower prescription drug costs for seniors by an average of $600, and we were also able to make a — make a significant dent in providing them the kind of preventive care that will ultimately save money through the — throughout the system.

So the way for us to deal with Medicare in particular is to lower health care costs. But when it comes to Social Security, as I said, you don't need a major structural change in order to make sure that Social Security is there for the future.

MR. LEHRER: We'll follow up on this.

First, Governor Romney, you have two minutes on Social Security and entitlements.

MR. ROMNEY: Well, Jim, our seniors depend on these programs. And I know any time we talk about entitlements, people become concerned that something's going to happen that's going to change their life for the worst, and the answer is, neither the president nor I are proposing any changes for any current retirees or near retirees, either to Social Security or Medicare. So if you're 60 or around 60 or older, you don't need to listen any further.

But for younger people, we need to talk about what changes are going to be occurring.

Oh, I just thought about one, and that is in fact I was wrong when I said the president isn't proposing any changes for current retirees. In fact, he is on Medicare. On Social Security, he's not.

But on Medicare, for current retirees he's cutting $716 billion from the program. Now, he says by not overpaying hospitals and providers, actually just going to them and saying we're going to reduce the rates you get paid across the board, everybody's going to get a lower rate. That's not just going after places where there's abuse, that's saying we're cutting the rates. Some 15 percent of hospitals and nursing homes say they won't take anymore Medicare patients under that scenario.

We also have 50 percent of doctors who say they won't take more Medicare patients. This — we have 4 million people on Medicare Advantage that will lose Medicare Advantage because of those $716 billion in cuts. I can't understand how you can cut Medicare $716 billion for current recipients of Medicare.

Now, you point out, well, we're putting some back; we're going to give a better prescription program. That's one — that's $1 for every 15 (dollars) you've cut. They're smart enough to know that's not a good trade.

I want to take that $716 billion you've cut and put it back into Medicare. By the way, we can include a prescription program if we need to improve it, but the idea of cutting $716 billion from Medicare to be able to balance the additional cost of "Obamacare" is, in my opinion, a mistake. And with regards to young people coming along, I've got proposals to make sure Medicare and Social Security are there for them without any question.

MR. LEHRER: Mr. President.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: First of all, I think it's important for Governor Romney to present this plan that he says will only affect folks in the future. And the essence of the plan is that he would turn Medicare into a voucher program. It's called premium support, but it's understood to be a voucher program. His running mate —

MR. LEHRER: And you — and you don't support that?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: I don't. And — and let me explain why.

MR. ROMNEY: Again, that's for future people —

PRESIDENT OBAMA: I understand.

MR. ROMNEY: — right, not for current retirees.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: For — for — so if you're — if you — you're 54 or 55, you might want to listen, because this — this will affect you. The idea, which was originally presented by Congressman Ryan, your running mate, is that we would give a voucher to seniors, and they could go out in the private marketplace and buy their own health insurance. The problem is that because the voucher wouldn't necessarily keep up with health care inflation, it was estimated that this would cost the average senior about $6,000 a year.

- more -

http://www.npr.org/2012/10/03/162258551/transcript-first-obama-romney-presidential-debate
"That must mean that Romney won't cut a cent from Social Security Benefits" ProSense Oct 2012 #1
Do you think that's what the President meant? MannyGoldstein Oct 2012 #2
Here: ProSense Oct 2012 #4
I don't see any reassurance that SS won't be cut. MannyGoldstein Oct 2012 #10
Indeed. 'Tweaked in the way Reagan tweaked it...' Marr Oct 2012 #17
"tweaked the way it was by Ronald Reagan and Speaker" = having workers pay more than the HiPointDem Oct 2012 #12
There was an actual problem that needed to be solved under Reagan MannyGoldstein Oct 2012 #15
The problem that needed to be solved was simply that the trust fund balance had gone nearly HiPointDem Oct 2012 #18
I think it meant that Romney will run away from a similarity...... Sheepshank Oct 2012 #3
The Simpson-Bowles Commission report is being touted............ socialist_n_TN Oct 2012 #5
The poorer you make them, the more fearful and docile they become jsr Oct 2012 #7
The deck was stacked by 'our' guy. appal_jack Oct 2012 #8
Thank you. woo me with science Oct 2012 #16
Oh now now, Woo Oilwellian Oct 2012 #37
It seems woo me with science Oct 2012 #38
Cutting... but not slashing... MannyGoldstein Oct 2012 #40
The "save-the-safety-net" side had token representation Art_from_Ark Oct 2012 #45
Had she been chair... appal_jack Oct 2012 #55
It's just easier for most folks to push realities like this out of their mind. Poll_Blind Oct 2012 #6
We are bought and sold. woo me with science Oct 2012 #9
If you keep voting for it kenny blankenship Oct 2012 #11
explain to me, if you can, where the 22% cut in benefits comes from? hfojvt Oct 2012 #13
It's calculated by the Chief Actuary of Social Security MannyGoldstein Oct 2012 #14
SS will still be able to pay out about 80% of presently scheduled benefits if no changes at all are HiPointDem Oct 2012 #19
Why are we talking about a 75 year horizon? abumbyanyothername Oct 2012 #33
Because that's the way the politicians set it up in 1982 -- on an 'actuarial basis'. HiPointDem Oct 2012 #35
"And it's pure fraud." Occulus Oct 2012 #20
how many benefits it cuts depends on income level hfojvt Oct 2012 #23
"Scaled Medium Earner" from the Chief Actuary's letter MannyGoldstein Oct 2012 #24
Cost of living is a relative measure... ljm2002 Oct 2012 #22
Excellent & true points, n/t. appal_jack Oct 2012 #48
I did a double take when I heard that remark... ljm2002 Oct 2012 #21
that one quote is DISTURBING- W H comment line here I come !!! tokenlib Oct 2012 #29
Post removed Post removed Oct 2012 #39
Kick woo me with science Oct 2012 #25
Any second now. JoePhilly Oct 2012 #26
And people wonder why I characterize compliments you might give him as backhanded... nt stevenleser Oct 2012 #27
right on fucking cue... Whisp Oct 2012 #28
I seriously cringed when he said that. nt NCTraveler Oct 2012 #30
I think it was a rhetorical strategy BarackTheVote Oct 2012 #31
"...and Obama went after him with incensed incredulity. It was a win." rudycantfail Oct 2012 #34
Write and call your representatives today. Call the White House. woo me with science Oct 2012 #32
As I type this, the post above says "What advice would you give the president for the next debate?" lumberjack_jeff Oct 2012 #36
Kick. Luminous Animal Oct 2012 #41
Obama's Social Security Answer Leaves Democrats Utterly Baffled Lasher Oct 2012 #42
Obama's been straight about his position since MannyGoldstein Oct 2012 #43
I recall that during the 2008 primary DURHAM D Oct 2012 #49
It's a lot easier to be the "tweak-er" than the "tweak-ee"--think about it "grand bargainers"... tokenlib Oct 2012 #44
Kick. This is important. nt woo me with science Oct 2012 #46
Kick woo me with science Oct 2012 #47
Kick woo me with science Oct 2012 #50
I can see having to adjust SSI if Politicalboi Oct 2012 #51
Austerity is coming regardless of who wins. CrispyQ Oct 2012 #52
For the moment this is still a democracy..we don't have to roll over and take the "tweaking." N/T tokenlib Oct 2012 #53
Kick in response to Axelrod inferring this needs to be discussed in "quiet rooms" when on Fox News.. tokenlib Oct 2012 #54
After the election, it will be too late to find out... kentuck Oct 2012 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama praises Romney: &qu...»Reply #4