Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Mitt Romney goes off the deep end with new defense of his embassy attack [View all]randome
(34,845 posts)36. He complains that the web site wasn't immediately corrected after the assault?
Hey, Mitt! They might have been a little busy then! What a douche-bag!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Mitt Romney goes off the deep end with new defense of his embassy attack [View all]
ProSense
Sep 2012
OP
It's not about the film. The film is an excuse for provocation possbly funded by SuperPAC money
patrice
Sep 2012
#2
Doesn't the bizarreness of it all suggest that SOMETHING ELSE is afoot here? He's not making sense
patrice
Sep 2012
#4
It's good to be skeptical of one's self, but not too much. It's all connected . . . somehow.
patrice
Sep 2012
#11
Do not attribute to malice that which can be explained by incompetence.
Bernardo de La Paz
Sep 2012
#24
That is good advice, because incompetence is more probable than all of the factors that would have
patrice
Sep 2012
#25
Reduced to information the low-information voter can understand and absorb:
coalition_unwilling
Sep 2012
#13