Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)

22. I want to know what constituted a parole violation...?

Reply to Cleita (Reply #10)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 01:20 PM

Sep 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Alleged anti-Muslim filmmaker taken to 'voluntary' talk with feds [View all] Cleita Sep 2012 OP

No, but at this moment he is probably being violated Strelnikov_ Sep 2012 #1

The parole violation I believe is local. It would be odd to involve the Feds Cleita Sep 2012 #2

Think he is on parole for Federal fraud conviction. n/t Strelnikov_ Sep 2012 #5

Exactly! DonViejo Sep 2012 #15

Hard to tell jsr Sep 2012 #3

There's no doubt he's a con artist and could possibly pull Cleita Sep 2012 #7

He's already out jsr Sep 2012 #11

What could they do anyway? Life Long Dem Sep 2012 #31

Based on the following paragraph Strelnikov_ Sep 2012 #13

It sure looks like it jsr Sep 2012 #21

A one-way ticket to Gitmo for producing a film. Bets that he won't even be charged with any crime? Zalatix Sep 2012 #4

The Feds involved make me wonder that more is afoot than Cleita Sep 2012 #10

I want to know what constituted a parole violation...? Zalatix Sep 2012 #22

From the story linked in the OP: pinboy3niner Sep 2012 #25

If he is an Egyptian whistler162 Sep 2012 #6

That could happen.n/t Cleita Sep 2012 #8

He is a naturalized citizen jsr Sep 2012 #16

You can still be stripped of your citizenship and deported if you are a naturalized citizen. Cleita Sep 2012 #20

Maybe they should look at his immigration files jsr Sep 2012 #24

He was questioned and released pinboy3niner Sep 2012 #9

That's too bad. Cleita Sep 2012 #12

The excerpt is from the OP link pinboy3niner Sep 2012 #18

Are you suggesting he should be in Gitmo? cthulu2016 Sep 2012 #14

More so than many of those who are in Gitmo for eternity Cleita Sep 2012 #17

It is sad to live in a world with people such as yourself cthulu2016 Sep 2012 #28

Federal fraud conviction nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #19

I stand corrected. Cleita Sep 2012 #23

That could set a dangerous precedent nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #27

I meant post #29 for you. n/t Cleita Sep 2012 #30

I don't see anyone saying the movie can't be shown or made. Cleita Sep 2012 #29

More from "The Wall Street Journal" Cleita Sep 2012 #26

Is there anything they can do him other than a good firm talking to? bluestateguy Sep 2012 #32

This has nothing to do with inciting riots ck4829 Sep 2012 #33

He did get Americans killed. Cleita Sep 2012 #34

No he did not ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #35

I wasn't talking about Benghazi. Cleita Sep 2012 #36

You still do not have exclusive cause and effect ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #37

The article specifically states that the Taliban said it was because of the movie Cleita Sep 2012 #38