Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: France: Yet another nation turns against globalism: 80% see it as a job-killer [View all]Zalatix
(8,994 posts)48. Whoa. Hate American workers and American freedoms much?
So much for yet another drive-by post...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
France: Yet another nation turns against globalism: 80% see it as a job-killer [View all]
Zalatix
Sep 2012
OP
It's very high, and the Democratic Party and liberals are making a huge mistake
JDPriestly
Sep 2012
#5
You left out the TRADE DEFICIT as a contributor to the budget deficit. PBS link:
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#19
Yes it is "by a slightly circuitous route." OTOH, the Bush contributions to the deficit are not
pampango
Sep 2012
#34
A contributor, but a tiny one (hardly an earthquake) compared to the Bush legacy (which has caused
pampango
Sep 2012
#40
Eliminate the domestic budget entirely and the trade deficit will still drag us down.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#41
Before someone we all know shows up with that inaccurate Pew poll, allow me to pre-empt:
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#11
Too late. BTW that "inaccurate" poll shows opposition to globalization growing to 68% by 2012 if
pampango
Sep 2012
#16
Sounds like you acknowledge that "protectionism was a Republican thing". FDR would have agreed.
pampango
Sep 2012
#20
Protectionism WAS a Republican thing. Just like abolishing slavery WAS a Republican thing.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#22
FDR did't fight higher tariffs because it was a republican thing, but because it was a BAD thing.
pampango
Sep 2012
#33
No it does not. It means that local/state/federal governments would have to buy from American
pampango
Sep 2012
#42
Yes it does. Stop being myopic. Protectionism began among the workers, not the FAR RIGHT.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#45
No. Protectionism was rejected by workers and progressives repeatedly in our history.
pampango
Sep 2012
#46
Protectionism rejected by workers? Now you're just engaging in wishful thinking.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#49
It was rejected by workers 100 years ago, again during FDR's administration and today
pampango
Sep 2012
#50
Workers rejected protectionism 100 years ago? LOL! Whatever you need to say to comfort yourself.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#53
"Again, tariffs protect the working class." And yet it is only republicans who have ever promoted
pampango
Sep 2012
#60
"Republicans support tariffs, ergo tariffs are bad". No. republicans support tariffs because
pampango
Sep 2012
#66
Still retreating to that Republican argument. You still can't accept the opposition is BIPARTISAN.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#68
I am glad that you are finding common ground with - let's call it the non-corporate wing
pampango
Sep 2012
#71
The poster from CATO has now devolved into calling *everyone else* a "Republican".
Romulox
Sep 2012
#81
Tea Party Repubs are rubes, and we all know it. The REAL money men at CATO agree with you 100%
Romulox
Sep 2012
#21
The 'strange bedfellows' argument, always a favorite. We all have them. Anything on this page
pampango
Sep 2012
#39
Still not disputing the historical basis that I provided for the statement, I see. n/t
pampango
Sep 2012
#61
Why is is laughably wrong? I need specifics (facts) not fancy slogans and assertions.
pampango
Sep 2012
#72
You contention that "free trade" hasn't decimated the US working class. Let's start there. nt
Romulox
Sep 2012
#79
You are not a "progressive". There is nothing "progressive" about you. Advocating for the powerful
Romulox
Sep 2012
#80
"Strange bedfellows" means you agree on one area, while DISAGREEING on most others.
Romulox
Sep 2012
#78
If so many Democrats support offshoring then why is Obama attacking Romney for OFFSHORING???
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#24
Meanwhile, the effort to discredit the new President has taken a familiar turn,...
Spitfire of ATJ
Sep 2012
#7
They accuse everyone they don't like of SEX! It's getting old, people like sex and they
sabrina 1
Sep 2012
#12
Which would mean those rioting crazies in Libya could move right next door to you.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#27
Your refusal to accept the basic facts would get many of the rest of us killed if you had any power.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#30
What you want is for Middle Eastern voters to have a say about your reproductive rights.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#32
Europe doesn't have open borders with the Middle East. Please keep up. We're talking about
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#54
Of course not, but they have open borders with many more countries than we do (0).
pampango
Sep 2012
#62
Other nations will not open their borders to each other. You're just wishfully thinking AGAIN.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#64
Wow. France is quitting the EU? That ultimate free trade, no tariffs, region?
Nye Bevan
Sep 2012
#43
Only the far-right National Front wants France to get out of the EU. Fortunately, they lost
pampango
Sep 2012
#47
Read a newspaper, for the love of god. The EU is currently in an existential crisis.
Romulox
Sep 2012
#82
It should be completely obvious to any reasonable person that globalism is a late stage terminal
Zorra
Sep 2012
#51
Those should be decisions made by the citizens of those nations. I don't live there. nt
Zorra
Sep 2012
#75