Reply #7

In the discussion thread: Chuck Todd is flabbergasted that the polling has stratified so early in the process.... [View all]

Response to ejpoeta (Reply #2)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 08:07 AM

WCGreen (44,915 posts)

7. And that is because he is so exposed due to the slogging nature of this campaign

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

46 replies	Author	Time	Post
Chuck Todd is flabbergasted that the polling has stratified so early in the process.... [View all]	WCGreen	Sep 2012	OP
I think upChuck would bite one the Clydesdales couldn't pull if...	Hubert Flottz	Sep 2012	#1
I personally think romney's the reason. people just don't trust him	ejpoeta	Sep 2012	#2
And that is because he is so exposed due to the slogging nature of this campaign	WCGreen	Sep 2012	#7
I was scowling at the polls yesterday	XemaSab	Sep 2012	#35
to be fair, Bush wasn't exactly beloved when he came into office	WooWooWoo	Sep 2012	#3
Interesting how that was done by	Ilsa	Sep 2012	#9
A most important distinction. Interesting that your reply is seemingly ignored.	Scuba	Sep 2012	#29
I forgot about those tomatoes n/t	goclark	Sep 2012	#28
There is nothing ''fair'' about that comparison. A group of citizens reacting to a bloodless coup is	Guy Whitey Corngood	Sep 2012	#36
But Chuckie was quick to say that the Middle East protests could hurt Obama.	charmay	Sep 2012	#4
Chuck is a Rovian hatchet man...	Hubert Flottz	Sep 2012	#8
So is Snooki	grantcart	Sep 2012	#5
I voted for Perot, so I know the "Bush lost because of Perot" claim is invalid.	Honeycombe8	Sep 2012	#6
but those rabid republicans would have never voted for Clinton.	WCGreen	Sep 2012	#10
I think they didn't vote. I do not think Perot took any more votes from Bush Sr than from Clinton.	Honeycombe8	Sep 2012	#17
When I have a little more time I will go back and see how the numbers played out.	WCGreen	Sep 2012	#37
Those of us who voted for Perot probably paid more attention to him than others.	Honeycombe8	Sep 2012	#41
Heh! I voted for Perot, too	alcibiades_mystery	Sep 2012	#25
i voted for perot too. it was my first election and I watched the debates	ejpoeta	Sep 2012	#44
Republicans are extremely sore losers	Freddie	Sep 2012	#11
that was because they were emboldened by the realignment of the voters	WCGreen	Sep 2012	#13
I agree with your posts	aaaaaa5a	Sep 2012	#21
And this is why the Repubs use the tactics they do to try and hold onto power.	Jennicut	Sep 2012	#46
Declining number of White males as the Boomers age and die off.	Ikonoklast	Sep 2012	#38
A decline in the White Males numbers should be stated as a decline of the	WCGreen	Sep 2012	#39
Yes, that's a real double whammy there.	Ikonoklast	Sep 2012	#40
Well the one sure thing is their motto of making Obama a one term president	davidpdx	Sep 2012	#16
It's going to be a long 8 weeks!	Freddie	Sep 2012	#19
Haha	davidpdx	Sep 2012	#24
Part of that was for Watergate!	gopiscrap	Sep 2012	#31
The 24/7 coverage means opinions are formed early	smorkingapple	Sep 2012	#12
Chuck wants to play with his toy until Nov. 6	BeyondGeography	Sep 2012	#14
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. nt	msanthrope	Sep 2012	#15
ROFL	alcibiades_mystery	Sep 2012	#26
I loved that skit!	smirkymonkey	Sep 2012	#42
Here you go--	msanthrope	Sep 2012	#43
Thanks!	smirkymonkey	Sep 2012	#45
We have his back.	wilt the stilt	Sep 2012	#18
Well said I agree	rbrnmw	Sep 2012	#20
"Republican" is the "default" setting for the presidency	SoCalDem	Sep 2012	#22
The honeymoon ended before the inaugural ball.	CanonRay	Sep 2012	#23
I think the vitriol directed to Clinton was just as bad	ChairmanAgnostic	Sep 2012	#27
For Clinton, it was still before Fox was on a lot of Cable Systems...	WCGreen	Sep 2012	#33
Good points.	ChairmanAgnostic	Sep 2012	#34
Is this book still available?	gopiscrap	Sep 2012	#30
Yes it is....	WCGreen	Sep 2012	#32

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.