Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
51. you implied it in your exchange with edweird. after you said obama should stay out of
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 07:40 PM
Sep 2012

these local disputes, edweird asked why he'd spoken about the firings at central falls.

you said federal funding.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1317112

or at least that's how i understood what you were saying.

Does anyone on DU honestly think this will happen? senseandsensibility Sep 2012 #1
Nope, never happen. nt Raine Sep 2012 #22
Not going to happen Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #37
The President Has Found It Difficult... Finding Those Comfortable Shoes... WillyT Sep 2012 #56
No. It's not the place of a President to get involved in a city's contract negotiations. Honeycombe8 Sep 2012 #63
No. TheCowsCameHome Sep 2012 #2
Considering the way things went in Central Falls, you're probably right. Edweird Sep 2012 #8
Yeah, I'm sure that will play well nobodyspecial Sep 2012 #3
Central Falls. Be careful what you wish for. Edweird Sep 2012 #4
It is not in the President's providence to get involved in state issues. Honeycombe8 Sep 2012 #5
Completely agree. TwilightGardener Sep 2012 #29
of course you are right. n/t Whisp Sep 2012 #31
+1 treestar Sep 2012 #59
And make Rahm look bad? I don't think so. n/t Old Union Guy Sep 2012 #6
Please--he's President of the US, not president of the teachers' union. MADem Sep 2012 #7
So then how do you explain this? Edweird Sep 2012 #10
Great example Teamster Jeff Sep 2012 #11
the central falls firings were a direct result of his education policies. *direct*. HiPointDem Sep 2012 #14
Lot of heads in the sand here. Lots of denial. woo me with science Sep 2012 #34
the entire ruling class agrees with rahm and his policy. when the (putatively liberal) gates HiPointDem Sep 2012 #35
Your second paragraph answers your own question. MADem Sep 2012 #33
chicago schools get federal funding, and chicago's renaissance 2010 was the blueprint for obama's HiPointDem Sep 2012 #46
That is fine--most schools get federal funding of some sort, you know. MADem Sep 2012 #47
No one said they *ran* the schools. You said that because the feds supplied $$ to central falls, HiPointDem Sep 2012 #49
No I did not say that. Not at all. I said that the feds supplied money to schools, I did NOT say MADem Sep 2012 #50
you implied it in your exchange with edweird. after you said obama should stay out of HiPointDem Sep 2012 #51
Schools do not have to take federal funding. If they take it, they know they are on the hook in MADem Sep 2012 #52
I see. You're claiming "federal funding" makes it appropriate for Obama to weigh in Edweird Sep 2012 #58
There is no REQUIREMENT for the federal government to weigh in on ANY state issue. MADem Sep 2012 #60
No, YOU brought up "federal funding" and I gave you the opportunity to elaborate. Edweird Sep 2012 #65
And I have done that--too bad you don't like my answer but that doesn't change reality. MADem Sep 2012 #67
Yeah, your 'answer' was some rambling, disjointed, unrelated nonsense Edweird Sep 2012 #70
No, it wasn't. My answer made sense, but all you can do is MADem Sep 2012 #71
You have, yet again, failed to explain what "federal funding" has to do with this. Edweird Sep 2012 #73
See, that's the point. Federal funding ALLOWS a President to remark on an issue with a certain MADem Sep 2012 #74
So, the President of the United States of America Edweird Sep 2012 #75
You're having a bit of trouble with the written word, I see. MADem Sep 2012 #76
Medical marijuana dispensaries Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #38
Not to be technical, but I'd say the FDA doesn't agree with your "state issue" MADem Sep 2012 #43
Unions = Local Issues Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #45
Sorry--I just don't take your point. There's no real equivalency there. MADem Sep 2012 #48
Holy crap that's a bad idea Joe the Revelator Sep 2012 #9
Couldn't have said it better myself n/t SickOfTheOnePct Sep 2012 #12
if he does, his campaign staff should be fired scheming daemons Sep 2012 #13
Why is it dumb to support unions - politically or otherwise? egduj Sep 2012 #20
As President SickOfTheOnePct Sep 2012 #21
8 reasons: NC, VA, OH, FL, NV, WI, NH, and CO scheming daemons Sep 2012 #23
When did it get to be dumb for a Democratic President to support Unions? sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #36
**crickets** Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #39
look one response up and the question is answered scheming daemons Sep 2012 #41
Non-sequiturs notwithstanding . . . Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #44
his chief of staff, his education policy, his political base. like that'll happen. HiPointDem Sep 2012 #15
Not gonna happen Moral Compass Sep 2012 #16
Anything more specific than SickOfTheOnePct Sep 2012 #17
interesting responses. mopinko Sep 2012 #18
Shaking the trees for his hometown of Chicago SickOfTheOnePct Sep 2012 #19
i am sure he would find something that he could spread around. mopinko Sep 2012 #24
Sorry, still think it's a bad idea SickOfTheOnePct Sep 2012 #25
Maybe Chicago could quit diverting 1/6 of taxes collected into private persons' pockets. HiPointDem Sep 2012 #32
I have a feeling he is on Rahm's side on this or he would have told him to shut it down... dkf Sep 2012 #26
Oh hell no RegieRocker Sep 2012 #27
them comfy shoes gonna stay in the closet...again. KG Sep 2012 #28
No thanks, he needs to keep focused on winning the election to help all Pisces Sep 2012 #30
I don't want that for a fucking nano second cali Sep 2012 #40
honestly, i am relieved mopinko Sep 2012 #42
Your sentiment is appreciated. randome Sep 2012 #54
I won't sign bluestateguy Sep 2012 #53
Quick, without using the Google, who said this? Hey Jude Sep 2012 #55
Who is being denied their right to organize and collectively bargain? MADem Sep 2012 #61
Quick, since neither of those things is being denied, DemocratsForProgress Sep 2012 #77
He is not going to get involved in a local labor dispute gollygee Sep 2012 #57
Will he? No. Should he? No. Proles Sep 2012 #62
Obama doesn't give a crap about public school teachers. Reader Rabbit Sep 2012 #64
Sure, because that is THE most important thing going on with him right now. GoCubsGo Sep 2012 #66
The union in Chicago is doing an excellent job of presenting their position. MineralMan Sep 2012 #68
Oh God no. Silliest "advice" demand, whatever, I ever heard. Care Acutely Sep 2012 #69
For why? This is the guy who not only appointed Duncan but loves his bullshit TheKentuckian Sep 2012 #72
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»have president obama come...»Reply #51