General Discussion

snot

(10,504 posts)

33. K&R'd. (And Naomi Wolf is awesome!)

Reply to Hissyspit (Original post)

Sun Sep 2, 2012, 11:54 PM

Sep 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

90 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Naomi Wolf: Sweden's Other Rape Suspects [View all] Hissyspit Sep 2012 OP

du rec. Nt xchrom Sep 2012 #1

K+R sibelian Sep 2012 #2

K + R + bonus dogknob Sep 2012 #3

Who will dare call Naomi Wolf a "rape apologist" or "Assange worshipper"? nt Bonobo Sep 2012 #4

I've dealt with a few... dogknob Sep 2012 #5

I love the picture. nt Bonobo Sep 2012 #7

Thank you dogknob Sep 2012 #8

When you call sex crimes investigators the "dating police," that's rape apologia. msanthrope Sep 2012 #31

Outraged idiots doing searches. Bonobo Sep 2012 #32

The Turley thread, right? nt msanthrope Sep 2012 #34

I am referring to the police of course. nt Bonobo Sep 2012 #35

Only problem with those allegations is that they are contradicted in the initial sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #55

Funny, how you never cite any of your claims with sworn testimony presented in a court. msanthrope Sep 2012 #60

Funny how YOU never seem able to find anything that is actual testimony from the sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #64

What are you talking about? The alleged victims have yet to give testimony. But Mr. Assange's msanthrope Sep 2012 #66

The alleged victims' statements to the police sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #71

Nonsense. You have no verified police statements, nothing taken in a court and crossed, msanthrope Sep 2012 #75

Interesting reorg Sep 2012 #76

No--I'm saying no one on this board has verified police statements, but undoubtedly, the msanthrope Sep 2012 #83

Quotes from the court record reorg Sep 2012 #87

The court called bullshit on the claim that the statements didn't support the EAW charges. Thanks msanthrope Sep 2012 #88

actually, they did not - and certainly could not, as you might agree reorg Sep 2012 #90

You've got to be kidding. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #78

Nope. You have nothing but unverified leaks. You have nothing from a court or an official msanthrope Sep 2012 #81

I'm sure the usual suspects will be here with their phony "feminism" once they clock in... backscatter712 Sep 2012 #37

They are a cabal pscot Sep 2012 #85

That would require getting a look at their pay stubs... n/t backscatter712 Sep 2012 #86

K&R nt avebury Sep 2012 #6

Actually Naomi your case would likely get the whistler162 Sep 2012 #9

That Was Her Point erpowers Sep 2012 #11

you are fatually wrong Swagman Sep 2012 #16

Yes, yes yes. And your evidence is........ DeSwiss Sep 2012 #44

Again, the "rape" charges against Assange Iggy Sep 2012 #10

+1. bemildred Sep 2012 #12

i`d say no one in this tale is really telling the truth madrchsod Sep 2012 #13

I'm sure someone will be along JoeyT Sep 2012 #14

assange goes public, leaves the country and draws all this attention, then supporters use this as a seabeyond Sep 2012 #15

very weird logic..and Assange IS innocent or do you know otherwise? Swagman Sep 2012 #17

i do not know that he is guilty or innocent, he ran. you do not know either. nt seabeyond Sep 2012 #20

Seabeyond, you have your timeline screwed up. riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #18

i do not get why no one recognizes that a high profile event like this MAKES seabeyond Sep 2012 #21

He was given permission to leave. After Wikileaks exposed the diplomatic cache riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #22

Naomi Wolf embarassed herself when she used the term 'dating police' to describe the investigators: msanthrope Sep 2012 #30

Do you know anything about this case? It sure doesn't sound like it. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #40

I can only add my K&R....... marmar Sep 2012 #19

"They're heeeeeerrrrrre!" 1monster Sep 2012 #51

Gee, this thread really dropped like a stone. Who coulda thunk it? nt riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #23

I blame the parrots. dogknob Sep 2012 #24

Largely because the argument is rather odd. jeff47 Sep 2012 #25

Actually its "Sweden does a particularly craptastic job pursuing every other rape case BUT this one riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #26

So....we should condemn Sweden for finally doing a good job in one case? (nt) jeff47 Sep 2012 #39

If we can't jail all the criminals, we should stop trying! Robb Sep 2012 #61

When the stakes are high... dogknob Sep 2012 #28

Lurve the pic! DeSwiss Sep 2012 #45

No, the point is that Sweden apparently does a terrible of job of prosecuting rape sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #41

So you're condemning them for finally doing the right thing in one rape case. jeff47 Sep 2012 #42

You are totally wrong. Sweden does NOT require an 'in-Sweden' interview. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #43

There's more than one kind of interview. jeff47 Sep 2012 #48

Now you're just making stuff up. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #49

What, specifically, did I make up? jeff47 Sep 2012 #56

This is not 'Law and Order'. This is reality, in Europe, where there are specific sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #59

So many words, still managing to utterly avoid the important question jeff47 Sep 2012 #68

That's what you're talking about NOW. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #72

Actually, it is exactly what I'm talking about. jeff47 Sep 2012 #79

what you said in posts #48 and #56, specifically reorg Sep 2012 #80

You should really read your own links jeff47 Sep 2012 #84

I did, and I can comprehend it as opposed to certain individuals reorg Sep 2012 #89

Sabrina, how many times have you already informed this person and others that 1monster Sep 2012 #53

I don't expect him to change his mind, I respond so that the big lie, as you rightfully sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #54

Please cite specifically where the UK supreme court got this case wrong. jeff47 Sep 2012 #58

Yeah, that's exactly what's going on - Hissyspit Sep 2012 #46

If you want to change their behavior, you don't want to attack them for the good behavior. (nt) jeff47 Sep 2012 #47

Ignoring rapists unless they are celebrities is not good behavior n/t LadyHawkAZ Sep 2012 #52

So the celebrities should get ignored too? (nt) jeff47 Sep 2012 #57

how about not ignoring ANY of them? LadyHawkAZ Sep 2012 #63

My point is we shouldn't be arguing for Assange to go free because they don't persue others jeff47 Sep 2012 #69

And my point was that pursuing ONE case relentlessly LadyHawkAZ Sep 2012 #73

FACTS: DeSwiss Sep 2012 #27

K & R HCE SuiGeneris Sep 2012 #29

K&R'd. (And Naomi Wolf is awesome!) snot Sep 2012 #33

K&R idwiyo Sep 2012 #36

knr Zorra Sep 2012 #38

DU rec Change has come Sep 2012 #50

HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Sep 2012 #62

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2012 #65

Maybe it's because he's a gazillionaire, high profile non-citizen who came into the country Honeycombe8 Sep 2012 #67

That comment probably could win the contest for internet comments most lacking sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #77

K&R Hell Hath No Fury Sep 2012 #70

that's her excuse? treestar Sep 2012 #74

K&R! KoKo Sep 2012 #82