Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(35,392 posts)

10. I wonder how many of those "unemployed" that are even "accurately" reflected in the numbers

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 08:10 PM

Sep 2012

are being employed "under the table" but not reported ...

You know, the ones who say they need to be paid in cash, no checks ...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Maybe, It is close to the number of jobs created under Clinton. Lone_Star_Dem Sep 2012 #7

I'm inclined to think your inclination Cha Sep 2012 #17

Surprised? elleng Sep 2012 #2

I wonder if he got the 23 million number from the Romney people. gulliver Sep 2012 #4

Don't blame Clint johnnie Sep 2012 #5

LOL! n/t LeftofObama Sep 2012 #8

But I believe by most non-gov't sources, the Lionessa Sep 2012 #6

You are defending Clint and Romeny staff ... Really? DURHAM D Sep 2012 #9

There's the U3 numbers and the U6 numbers. Zalatix Sep 2012 #12

Evidently the U6 is about 15% right now.. Fumesucker Sep 2012 #20

imagine that, a lyin' teabugger spanone Sep 2012 #11

Hint: he's an ACTOR! Hi profession is to deceive. fascisthunter Sep 2012 #13

Yeah, he's a MF Liar just like mitt and mini mitt. Cha Sep 2012 #16

That might actually be a low number Hydra Sep 2012 #18

Eastwood is a Republican. Terra Alta Sep 2012 #19

Depends on what he means by "unemployment." Igel Sep 2012 #21