Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Only the . sendero Sep 2012 #1
bullshit. Buzz Clik Sep 2012 #52
I know plenty about it. sendero Sep 2012 #65
My comment has to do without you baseless judgment of other people. Buzz Clik Sep 2012 #80
If you admittedly know nothing of the facts of the case, why are you judging the opinions of others? leveymg Sep 2012 #111
Wrong. Completely wrong. Buzz Clik Sep 2012 #160
+1000 DeSwiss Sep 2012 #162
the sad truth is that allegations based on sex are destructive and are Swagman Sep 2012 #279
du rec. Nt xchrom Sep 2012 #2
Nope. Not enough credible evidence fredamae Sep 2012 #3
Not this liberal. ananda Sep 2012 #4
Thank you. A well-written piece. nt Bonobo Sep 2012 #5
What article did you read? whistler162 Sep 2012 #151
"god of the hour"??? Matariki Sep 2012 #203
I don't see liberals here believing them. woo me with science Sep 2012 #6
you point out some important truths about DU and society in general. iemitsu Sep 2012 #58
From an article written by Cass Sunstein, OnyxCollie Sep 2012 #69
thank you for providing the evidence to support my claim. iemitsu Sep 2012 #90
Very important information. Thanks for posting it. AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #96
Wonderful post, OnyxCollie. Really hit it dead-center. leveymg Sep 2012 #117
Conspiracy theories exist because the official explanations no longer make sense. HiPointDem Sep 2012 #126
"When it can be established OnyxCollie Sep 2012 #127
Oh, but didn't you know, that's conspiracy theory. backscatter712 Sep 2012 #133
Democratic Underground, LLC is impervious to such infiltration. OnyxCollie Sep 2012 #138
This needs a thread of its own to make sure more people see it. 1monster Sep 2012 #157
I posted it in GD a couple weeks ago. Got locked and told to take it to Creative Speculation. backscatter712 Sep 2012 #169
Thank you. nt woo me with science Sep 2012 #183
+1 HiPointDem Sep 2012 #125
Exactly. But be careful calling the astroturfers astroturfers. backscatter712 Sep 2012 #64
They are here, woo me with science Sep 2012 #186
Well said. And your observation is worth repeating. Please let me borrow a portion: AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #98
don't forget supporting the nuclear power industry. iemitsu Sep 2012 #163
No, sorry, that's a pretty stupid assertion, I'm afraid. Spider Jerusalem Sep 2012 #129
An excellent post. Rape apologia requires a lot of explanation, though, which is why msanthrope Sep 2012 #148
And it has not occurred to you that there is available evidence in this case which sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #172
That's nice, congratulations Spider Jerusalem Sep 2012 #187
Oh please. woo me with science Sep 2012 #194
He is not charged with or wanted for rape. You still are not in possession of the facts sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #196
No, I am in possession of the facts Spider Jerusalem Sep 2012 #207
Obviously you are not in possession of the facts. He is wanted for QUESTIONING. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #209
He is not "wanted for questioning" Spider Jerusalem Sep 2012 #210
He is wanted for questioning. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #213
No, he is not merely "wanted for questioning". Spider Jerusalem Sep 2012 #216
"... In the Swedish system formal indictment takes place at a very late stage in proceedings, struggle4progress Sep 2012 #225
Again he is wanted for questioning, that is all. There are no charges filed. I am well sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #229
... In this matter, the prosecutor’s deliberations resulted in a request for the detention struggle4progress Sep 2012 #244
"... The position with offence 4 is different. This is an allegation of rape. The framework list struggle4progress Sep 2012 #223
and yet they will relentlessly say otherwise fascisthunter Sep 2012 #171
Not this Liberal either. 99Forever Sep 2012 #7
Just the opposite... SidDithers Sep 2012 #8
not ignoring them Enrique Sep 2012 #18
I ignore nothing-but focus fredamae Sep 2012 #29
Pesky liberals and their support of whistle blowers. rhett o rick Sep 2012 #40
There are no sex charges against Assange. That is why Liberals sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #79
Take it up with the OP... SidDithers Sep 2012 #115
Then why did not correct it? sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #135
"... The position with offence 4 is different. This is an allegation of rape. The framework list struggle4progress Sep 2012 #265
Is that your experience in Canada? Are liberals in Canada the same as liberals in the US? AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #104
... SidDithers Sep 2012 #109
There are no sex charges against Assange. How often do you need to be sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #200
"... The position with offence 4 is different. This is an allegation of rape. The framework list struggle4progress Sep 2012 #266
Hero worship gets in the way of a rational discussion of this. randome Sep 2012 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author marmar Sep 2012 #10
So does strident labeling of anyone who questions the charges as being afflicted by "hero worship" marmar Sep 2012 #11
Not at all. randome Sep 2012 #13
If Assange "steps out" in Sweden, he could be "Siegelmann"'d Doctor_J Sep 2012 #23
After two years of letting him play the appeals process for all it was worth... randome Sep 2012 #25
Nothing has changed because of Assange?? Doctor_J Sep 2012 #30
No nothing, and giving him credit for every single thing that happened treestar Sep 2012 #191
There are a few countries in this world that would totally disagree with you on that. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #234
Assange "stole"??? 1monster Sep 2012 #45
I suppose the correct statement is that Manning stole the documents. randome Sep 2012 #83
Oh, so now you are condemning him for NOT stealing. 1monster Sep 2012 #159
Not at all. How could you interpret it that way? treestar Sep 2012 #192
"letting him play the appeals process for all it was worth" JDPriestly Sep 2012 #53
Is breaking the terms of his bail part of the process, too? randome Sep 2012 #54
Purely silly treestar Sep 2012 #190
Narcissism isn't against the law in any country, as far as I'm aware. If the women themselves 1monster Sep 2012 #31
Exactly. The world is watching. randome Sep 2012 #35
President Obama dosen't flinch at "taking out" actual and supposed enemies and 1monster Sep 2012 #42
Yes, justice is always up to us. randome Sep 2012 #48
You know what? I don't care what you think. Especially since you are using 1monster Sep 2012 #63
Have you a link for "has refused to cooperate with the Swedish police", please? muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #108
Its been a while since I read it, but will try to find it for you... 1monster Sep 2012 #168
Opening Post, second paragraph 1monster Sep 2012 #174
That's just an American writer claiming it, in an opinion piece muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #175
You still haven't read the damned police interview protocols, have you n/t reorg Sep 2012 #176
Yes, I did (nt) muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #178
Apparently, Sweden is a unique jurisdiction...a person reports acts, and then msanthrope Sep 2012 #180
And being a narcissist means he is a rapist. JDPriestly Sep 2012 #47
I asked you before but you have not answered: Where do you see this hero-worship, and who sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #99
+1000! eom BlueMTexpat Sep 2012 #32
How else to explain an utter inability to distinguish the treestar Sep 2012 #189
What are you talking about? Repetez en anglais, s'il vous plait. marmar Sep 2012 #198
And who would be these 'hero worshippers' you speak of? sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #85
I agree liberal_at_heart Sep 2012 #144
Nope. Unless of course you automatically believe that women lie about assault. Honeycombe8 Sep 2012 #12
Red herring and diversion. ananda Sep 2012 #14
You're not denying the charges? You just think he should get a free pass? randome Sep 2012 #15
TYFYC. nt valerief Sep 2012 #60
You're welcome. randome Sep 2012 #67
Why, if they have a case, have they not filed it? sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #82
So you're saying that this grand conspiracy against Assange... randome Sep 2012 #84
I stated a fact. There are still no charges against Assange after two, long years where it was sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #88
You already know the answer to that. randome Sep 2012 #93
And you already know that this excuse has been debunked over and over again. Even they sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #95
So the conspirators leave that big a hole in their plans? randome Sep 2012 #100
Resorting again to personal attacks, but you still have not answered the question nearly sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #105
I don't think I added 'personal attacks' to my arguments. randome Sep 2012 #113
It is not correct to say that Sweden could not arrest someone in London. They are a member sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #110
He was arrested for return to Sweden, though, isn't that it? randome Sep 2012 #114
Um, a Swedish court has ordered his arrest: the Swedes want him back in Sweden to arrest him struggle4progress Sep 2012 #253
"... The position with offence 4 is different. This is an allegation of rape. The framework list Vi struggle4progress Sep 2012 #267
Lies, lies and lies are all you are offering. Assange was cleared and allowed to leave 1monster Sep 2012 #34
Assange left Sweden the day before his scheduled interview with the prosecutor hack89 Sep 2012 #240
Assange had no scheduled interview with the prosecutor. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #286
No - the lawyer admits under oath that he lied before hack89 Sep 2012 #290
I don't care what the lawyer did. You made the false claim that Assange had sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #293
There was a scheduled appointment - the lawyer admits to it. hack89 Sep 2012 #297
"... In cross-examination the Swedish lawyer confirmed that paragraph 13 of his proof of evidence is struggle4progress Sep 2012 #251
Well, if he had run, you would have a point. But he did not run. In fact he went to the police sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #92
The Assange defense lied about that in UK court, and the UK court caught them lying: struggle4progress Sep 2012 #252
The defense did not lie, the defense like many defense attorneys do every day sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #289
Assange's attorney admitted to the court he had made untrue claims -- yet you repeat those claims struggle4progress Sep 2012 #294
What the lawyer and the prosecutor did is not relevant to what Assange did. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #296
No, I believe a woman when she says 'there was no rape'. Why would anyone not believe her? sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #97
"The other woman wanted to report rape. I gave my testimony to support her story" struggle4progress Sep 2012 #276
God damn it ! THERE ARE NO CHARGES ! Swagman Sep 2012 #282
There is a valid arrest order from a Swedish court, which has withstood several appeals struggle4progress Sep 2012 #295
Glad you brought up the 'valid arrest warrant'. There is doubt as to whether that arrest sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #298
The matter's been litigated thoroughly in both the UK and Sweden. The Swedish court's arrest order struggle4progress Sep 2012 #299
The matter of the legitimacy of the warrant has been raised and has not been litigated sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #300
Warrant validity was the central topic in the UK cases. Assange lost. The cases are here: struggle4progress Sep 2012 #301
It has not been litigated in Sweden. The issue has been raised in Sweden and sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #303
K&R Cleita Sep 2012 #16
Only the ones without critical thinking skills. nt Comrade_McKenzie Sep 2012 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #19
Only the liberals who have OnyxCollie Sep 2012 #20
Not this liberal... AnneD Sep 2012 #21
Ha! Rove? randome Sep 2012 #37
Need to read the link.... KoKo Sep 2012 #38
Sorry. randome Sep 2012 #43
Yes, Rove, glad you brought it up. Rove has been, oh so coincidentally, in the background sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #101
I hear he's related to Kevin Bacon, too. randome Sep 2012 #103
Let me try again to keep this discussion on an adult level. Why has the prosecutor sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #106
Got any evidence of that? I'm sure you are not trying to be funny since you apparently take sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #107
I think nothing of Rove, the criminal 'mastermind' behind Palin, Romney & Akin. randome Sep 2012 #120
So you believe that he is a war criminal. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #128
LOL!... SidDithers Sep 2012 #118
Not everywhere, but definitely and coincidentally in Sweden at just the 'right' time. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #231
Rove and his dirty tricks..... AnneD Sep 2012 #228
If you remember he was being questioned by Congress for his role in the firing of the US sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #232
That will be one... AnneD Sep 2012 #233
Some of our peeps are a little like the Dittiots Doctor_J Sep 2012 #22
From someone whose favorite group is the gungeon! valerief Sep 2012 #61
An ad hominem fallacy is the best that you've got? That's it? AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #102
Yeah, a poll in gungeon wouldn't be biased. valerief Sep 2012 #132
Selection bias in that poll. ElboRuum Sep 2012 #302
I miss UnRec krawhitham Sep 2012 #24
Yes. a2liberal Sep 2012 #26
It's one of the easiest ways to manipulate liberals. The Doctor. Sep 2012 #27
and I seriously doubt they are liberals fascisthunter Sep 2012 #28
If there are two 'sides' to the Assange story... randome Sep 2012 #36
Invectives such as "rape apologist" you mean? nt Bonobo Sep 2012 #41
'Rape apologists'. randome Sep 2012 #46
"Rape apologist" is more offensive than any of the ones you listed. Bonobo Sep 2012 #50
There are invectives from both sides, I agree. randome Sep 2012 #51
Yes there are two sides and it's not the liberal side that wants rhett o rick Sep 2012 #44
This liberal does not want to 'lynch' anyone. randome Sep 2012 #49
Then we agree. However, in an earlier post I believe you called him rhett o rick Sep 2012 #81
The Swedish Prosecutors are entirely responsible for the sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #164
Such as your own comments in this thread dismissing those who actually want to see sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #143
I don't want to see any evidence because it's none of my business. randome Sep 2012 #147
Well that has been obvious, 'I don't want to see any evidence'. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #166
Brava! Papable hit. Valid point! 1monster Sep 2012 #185
x2 AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #217
+1000 valerief Sep 2012 #56
self-delete; dupe valerief Sep 2012 #62
BS. Why is this case the litmus test for whether a person is a liberal? treestar Sep 2012 #193
No, but right-wingers who pose as liberals on liberal websites brentspeak Sep 2012 #33
+1000 valerief Sep 2012 #57
+1000 more! backscatter712 Sep 2012 #66
Bullseye! Thread win for total succinct accuracy. nt Zorra Sep 2012 #74
K&R KoKo Sep 2012 #39
Only those 'posing' as liberals claim to believe this shit. valerief Sep 2012 #55
From my observations, I've seen quite the opposite reaction among liberals to the charges Cirque du So-What Sep 2012 #59
But I thought Obama wanted Assange 'put away'. randome Sep 2012 #68
Obama is a centrist, not a liberal. We liberals wish he was a liberal. Oh, yeah, and valerief Sep 2012 #134
Yeah, but I don't think a centrist would be out to 'get' Assange. randome Sep 2012 #137
K&R'd. snot Sep 2012 #70
No, he needs to face those charges. alarimer Sep 2012 #71
There are NO fucking charges to face, "serious" or otherwise. 99Forever Sep 2012 #87
Whatever you or Sweden want to call them, the facts are... randome Sep 2012 #89
And again, you leave out one very important fact. Assange has been available for questioning sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #141
Save your imperiosa argumentum... 99Forever Sep 2012 #170
The only reason I repeatedly respond to this posters comments sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #199
It takes energy to do what you are doing to set the facts straight, and I thank you. AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #220
What charges? He has never been charged? sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #116
In my experience no one is ever too eager to believe rape charges, particularly against a celebrity. D23MIURG23 Sep 2012 #72
I see the opposite in this case. I see a concerted effort to believe the rape sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #173
HUH? I'm a liberal.... Iggy Sep 2012 #73
What were the women wearing? Did they lead him on? Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #75
You should really do some Googling before you post something like that. randome Sep 2012 #78
Far more important than any of that, THEY DENIED THERE WAS ANY RAPE. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #121
Did they say that there was NO SEXUAL ASSAULT OF ANY KIND? Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #149
They stated that there was no threat to them, that they were never in danger sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #161
Well, if that is true, then Assange should be able to win easily in Sweden struggle4progress Sep 2012 #245
"The other woman wanted to report rape. I gave my testimony to support her story" struggle4progress Sep 2012 #277
In what way, exactly, are those who have abandoned the presumption of innocence "liberals"? AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #76
You haven't been keeping up with the case since 2010, it seems muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #124
You are claiming to have special expertise on an issue of which you obviously do not such expertise. AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #206
'All lawyers'? Totally wrong. You apparently are the one not keeping up with this case. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #238
This is not about success in court; it's about when the allegation is 'rape' muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #239
Some interesting excerpts from Donald Boström's statement: ronnie624 Sep 2012 #287
Note that the rape allegation is about Sofia, not the woman Boström refers to (nt) muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #288
Sofia went to the police initially, ronnie624 Sep 2012 #291
"... The position with offence 4 is different. This is an allegation of rape. The framework list V struggle4progress Sep 2012 #268
There are a few DUers here who'll do everything they can to smear Assange. Alduin Sep 2012 #77
Really? In a country that brought us... KansDem Sep 2012 #86
Liberals? Why are we getting dumped on again? Rex Sep 2012 #91
Bizarre question. nt bemildred Sep 2012 #94
K&R You got five of them to come out so far. n/t Egalitarian Thug Sep 2012 #112
I neither believe or disbelieve those charges. MineralMan Sep 2012 #119
It is all moot, you're right. randome Sep 2012 #122
And all three of those who were there have said 'there was no rape'. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #142
Did they say that to you, Sabrina 1? MineralMan Sep 2012 #181
No, I have it directly from the evidence. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #230
"the public’s desire to see officials investigate rape/crimes against women is being exploited" HiPointDem Sep 2012 #123
Too bad for Assange that he wasn't accused of torture or banking fraud. OnyxCollie Sep 2012 #130
If he's wanted by Sweden, he's definitely guilty MannyGoldstein Sep 2012 #131
You left Karl Rove out of your tin-foil theory, Manny....nt SidDithers Sep 2012 #136
Yes, he did. But I did not. Karl Rove fled to Sweden when he was wanted here by sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #140
Did you have any specific comments regarding facts? MannyGoldstein Sep 2012 #226
Sweeden needs to back off on Assange. (nt) w4rma Sep 2012 #139
Here's how George Galloway put it... Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #152
"Shooting George Galloway in the face isn't murder! It's just bad gun etiquette!" struggle4progress Sep 2012 #158
Probably. Robb Sep 2012 #145
I think there are people on both sides of this issue liberal_at_heart Sep 2012 #146
Wypijewski's piece shows just how much analytical power the Left has lost, by abandoning struggle4progress Sep 2012 #150
Wrong. The analytical powers of the left have never been stronger. Zorra Sep 2012 #165
Your peculiar belief, that everyone who disagrees with you is a rightwinger, can serve struggle4progress Sep 2012 #197
Your peculiar penchant for trashing the left and leftists has Zorra Sep 2012 #202
Your peculiar belief, that everyone who disagrees with you is a rightwinger, can serve struggle4progress Sep 2012 #212
LOL! Bush: "See in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again Zorra Sep 2012 #247
At the risk of being flamed to death... renie408 Sep 2012 #153
Wikileaks is sacred here liberal_at_heart Sep 2012 #155
it's nothing to do with wikileaks being 'sacred'. i personally have doubts about what wikileaks HiPointDem Sep 2012 #221
Yeah, it is a mystery, isn't it? randome Sep 2012 #156
Authoritarian government woo me with science Sep 2012 #182
Did you recognize that you use the word "Americans' in the exact same way a renie408 Sep 2012 #214
It IS interesting! OnyxCollie Sep 2012 #218
Some people were so thrilled with Wikileaks treestar Sep 2012 #195
Wow Fla_Democrat Sep 2012 #154
TPTB know how to turn...... DeSwiss Sep 2012 #167
That's because "Israel Shamir" who authored that rumour (at your link) is well known in Sweden msanthrope Sep 2012 #179
Yep. Note the mantra. woo me with science Sep 2012 #184
Many people come here simply to find out what happened Herlong Sep 2012 #177
What we believe does not matter treestar Sep 2012 #188
Is that philosophy true across the boards or just when you find it a good arguing point. Bonobo Sep 2012 #201
Pretty much. A legal system is to make it go by the evidence treestar Sep 2012 #285
What we know is that the prosecutor has evaded and obfuscated and avoided filing sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #204
OMG. enough is enough. Time to trash this thread. Good ridance. liberal_at_heart Sep 2012 #205
I believe he should answer the charges, assuming neither guilt nor innocence. AtomicKitten Sep 2012 #208
Well, that's up to the prosecutor. He already voluntary spoke to the police. But the prosecutor sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #211
The Assange defense lied about that in UK court, and the UK court caught them lying: struggle4progress Sep 2012 #270
You "believe he should answer the charges" when no charges have been brought by a prosecutor? AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #215
Charges as in formal allegation. 'Kay? Knock off the semantics BS. AtomicKitten Sep 2012 #219
"semantics BS"? Is that different from your "BS"? AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #222
You clearly do not value (nor are familiar with) Sweden's legal due process. AtomicKitten Sep 2012 #224
extradition is NOT used merely to ask questions daeron Sep 2012 #227
And you clearly do not understand Sweden's legal due process. A process that so far sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #237
Before accusing others of unfamiliarity with facts.. girl gone mad Sep 2012 #284
What is a 'formal allegation'? Is that a new legal term? sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #236
"... The position with offence 4 is different. This is an allegation of rape. The framework list struggle4progress Sep 2012 #271
"... In the Swedish system formal indictment takes place at a very late stage in proceedings, struggle4progress Sep 2012 #272
The Stockholm District Court has ordered Assange's arrest. He appealed twice but lost struggle4progress Sep 2012 #273
There are no charges. If there ever are, then maybe he can answer them. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #235
Besides the charges on his arrest warrant you mean? nt hack89 Sep 2012 #241
Hack's back. How about answering my questions on your standards as the arbiter of a sex crime riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #242
Still denying reality I see? hack89 Sep 2012 #243
Nice try hack. The women didn't report a crime, they went for an HIV test riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #246
So why are they still pursuing the issue? hack89 Sep 2012 #248
If you answer my questions first, I'll answer yours. riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #249
None of that is rape if it was consensual. hack89 Sep 2012 #250
I wouldn't. And neither did the women in Sweden. But you are saying you get to decide riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #255
So where did the detailed and graphic description found in the arrest warrant hack89 Sep 2012 #256
I just told you the exact same thing happened to me this morning and I am a-ok with that. riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #259
Why are you ignoring the three other charges? hack89 Sep 2012 #261
So why did the women describe an sexual assault? hack89 Sep 2012 #257
NO! The women didn't describe sexual assault! riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #260
I don't think you have shown me any such interview. hack89 Sep 2012 #262
. riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #263
So these women have made no public comment since 2010? hack89 Sep 2012 #264
The same woman didn't think it was rape, but did think it was assault tammywammy Sep 2012 #281
"The other woman wanted to report rape. I gave my testimony to support her story" struggle4progress Sep 2012 #278
"... The position with offence 4 is different. This is an allegation of rape. The framework list struggle4progress Sep 2012 #274
The Stockholm District Court has ordered Assange's arrest. He appealed twice but lost struggle4progress Sep 2012 #275
I would ask the opposite question. mzmolly Sep 2012 #254
I can't dismissed the allegations that she was a CIA operative Ichingcarpenter Sep 2012 #258
I thought there was more than one mzmolly Sep 2012 #269
There were two women involved. n/t tammywammy Sep 2012 #283
Yes--you can dismiss those allegations....they are completely fabricated by a nasty little man msanthrope Sep 2012 #292
and they are not victims : they are 'alleged victims' just as the accused has Swagman Sep 2012 #280
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are Liberals Too Eager to...»Reply #30