Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

MadHound

(34,179 posts)

17. Like I said before, I congratulate you for being honest about your extreme bias against Apple

Reply to Poll_Blind (Reply #12)

Mon Aug 27, 2012, 02:45 PM

Aug 2012

And despite what some members of the jury are saying now, we don't, and never will, have the full story of what went on in that deliberation room.

And again, it isn't like Samsung doesn't have legal recourse in this case, they can, and probably will, appeal, and this whole thing will be in the hands of another jury.

What you never answered is if that second jury once again finds for Apple, will you be happy with that decision, or will you be back on the boards here blazing away about a huuuuuge miscarriage of justice?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Apple vs Samsung: Jurors talk to media about their deliberations, sound like absolute idiots [View all] Poll_Blind Aug 2012 OP

OMG!! "In fact we skipped that one, so we could go on faster. It was bogging us down." uponit7771 Aug 2012 #1

both sides choose the jury. spanone Aug 2012 #2

Neither Apple's nor Samsung's lawyers bear responsibility for this kind of epic fuckup. Poll_Blind Aug 2012 #6

You do realize the trial and appellate courts don't look at what jurors say afterward, do you? AngryAmish Aug 2012 #8

But it's not just what the jurors said afterward- that's the point of the articles at Groklaw: Poll_Blind Aug 2012 #10

Most of the time juries don't read the instructions AngryAmish Aug 2012 #16

But appellate courts do look at what the jury did in the verdict form. stranger81 Aug 2012 #13

I don't know if they did award damages on patents found to be non-infringing AngryAmish Aug 2012 #15

I don't want to take sides... FreeJoe Aug 2012 #3

Surprise, surprise, an Apple hater not liking the verdict handed down MadHound Aug 2012 #4

The Apple shorts don't like it for sure. /nt still_one Aug 2012 #5

+100 Ezlivin Aug 2012 #7

Not about Apple or Samsung: It's about a jury that isn't heeding the judge's instructions and... Poll_Blind Aug 2012 #9

Well, at least you're being honest with yourself and the rest of us MadHound Aug 2012 #11

Which is why I brought that fact up twice in my own, still unedited, OP when I wrote it. Poll_Blind Aug 2012 #12

Like I said before, I congratulate you for being honest about your extreme bias against Apple MadHound Aug 2012 #17

I'm not entirely adverse to adressing hypothetical situations but, honestly, any second jury... Poll_Blind Aug 2012 #18

This is only a pyrrhic victory for Apple dipsydoodle Aug 2012 #14

Dumbing down the populace only means more of this... JFN1 Aug 2012 #19

The intent of Voir Dire is to ensure Riftaxe Aug 2012 #20