Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
83. What the hell are you even trying to say? You should just say it.
Mon Aug 27, 2012, 12:03 PM
Aug 2012

Is it that since we were lied to in the past, we should accept it now? Or what? Come out and say what you mean.

Wikileaks wouldn't exist if money wasn't the driving force for just about everything organized 2on2u Aug 2012 #1
I am wondering how bad it has to get before the people strike out. rhett o rick Aug 2012 #2
That's Just What Our Government Thinks, Too goodword Aug 2012 #77
Sad thing though is that usually all they end up doing is fighting their own johnlucas Aug 2012 #79
I agree that revolutions will only replace one set of masters with another. rhett o rick Aug 2012 #103
...and there are some that are still Flogging Hillary for VP formercia Aug 2012 #3
Hillary did not act alone. bvar22 Aug 2012 #58
Yes. My biggest problem with Obama is not his economic or foreign policies. It is 1monster Aug 2012 #80
Read War is a Racket sometime. hootinholler Aug 2012 #4
I need to read it, as well as a few others... rwsanders Aug 2012 #9
Lots of good info here... hootinholler Aug 2012 #29
"...the hidden reason for our entry into Vietnam." KansDem Aug 2012 #30
Cheney and Koch seem to be orchestrating much of the Romney/Walker installations, and so this info. midnight Aug 2012 #42
Capitalism doesn't naturally seek innovation in the traditional sense Hydra Aug 2012 #59
Without the Brown bros LBJ would never have run for office dixiegrrrrl Aug 2012 #95
If you needed wikileaks to realize that... then you must be very young CabCurious Aug 2012 #5
But now it's more than just "realizing" Wednesdays Aug 2012 #6
Did you know that you are using the talking point invented by Stratfor to try to diminish sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #8
I'm waiting for the info. on the bankers... I can't imagine how much worse it could be, but it must midnight Aug 2012 #12
I think they have succeeded in stopping the Bank leaks unfortunately. sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #43
Other familiar RW talking point tama Aug 2012 #35
That was the strategy settled on as revealed in the Stratfor emails. sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #40
Most who spread it tama Aug 2012 #46
Well we did find out from Wikileaks a few things we could not have imagined in 2008 sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #10
What's so terrible about US officials advocating for Boeing airplanes? pnwmom Aug 2012 #21
And so much more. Thank you for this OP. Flooding DU with anti-Wikileaks spam is sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #7
Yeah, and most of DU is sick of it fascisthunter Aug 2012 #14
Obama administration violates Geneva Convention against torture. OnyxCollie Aug 2012 #11
It's hard to see why the law is side stepped when it's quit clear that we can't be in the business midnight Aug 2012 #15
Well that was certainly spam treestar Aug 2012 #20
So what? Le Taz Hot Aug 2012 #68
"This isn't some fucking football game" They_Live Aug 2012 #78
So who will you vote for then? treestar Aug 2012 #108
We had so much hope of seeing the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld liars and criminals finally sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #22
Not to mention the financial crimes Eddie Haskell Aug 2012 #101
Never pass up an opportunity to bash Obama, eh? The Doctor. Aug 2012 #48
Post removed Post removed Aug 2012 #69
How could we secretly bomb a place treestar Aug 2012 #13
I'm sure many folks did notice..... I think the secret part is not reporting it... midnight Aug 2012 #17
So AP and the NYT and the Yemen Times missed it? treestar Aug 2012 #19
I'm sure a lot of average people read those Ash_F Aug 2012 #31
The cover story was that Yemen's military had bombed a place in Yemen kenny blankenship Aug 2012 #44
Do you think that members of the Bush administration who lied this country into sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #23
What a creepy government we have fascisthunter Aug 2012 #16
About the allegations made against Julian Assange: pnwmom Aug 2012 #18
This OP appears to be about the Bush war crimes. What does Assange's personal sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #24
If that is how it appears to you, it's because you didn't read THE WHOLE THING. pnwmom Aug 2012 #25
This OP is about Wikileaks' revelations related to war crimes committed by the Bush sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #27
This OP says it's about how much our government lies to us, both concerning war crimes, pnwmom Aug 2012 #33
This OP is about how Wikileaks demonstrated with whistle blower leaks, how much our sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #41
Post removed Post removed Aug 2012 #49
All I can say is if anyone cares about this country they will focus on the reasons why sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #50
Sweden could at least question him in the UK GliderGuider Aug 2012 #26
They can't proceed with this particular type of "interview" pnwmom Aug 2012 #34
Could you point me to some support for that? GliderGuider Aug 2012 #36
I will look for it, but I can't remember off the top of my head pnwmom Aug 2012 #37
Okay, I've found something. It's discussed here in "Myth Four." pnwmom Aug 2012 #38
Thanks. That seems to settle that issue. nt GliderGuider Aug 2012 #39
Assange HAS been arrested in London, under a warrant issued by the Swedish Prosecutor. sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #51
No, nothing prevents Sweden from having an Interpol arrest of Assange in England, pnwmom Aug 2012 #52
So, they can place him under arrest in London GliderGuider Aug 2012 #54
It would be Interpol arresting him, and then extraditing him to Sweden. pnwmom Aug 2012 #56
No it wouldn't only be Interpo. Sweden is a member of the EU. All members of the EU can issue an EAW sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #90
The Swedes didn't arrest Assange in London - the Brits did. nt hack89 Aug 2012 #82
It was not an Interpol arrest warrant. . sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #55
Wrong. Here is the official notice of the Arrest Warrant Issued by Interpol pnwmom Aug 2012 #60
You said that Sweden could not arrest Assange in London. That was clearly false. sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #64
You're still wrong. Sweden could NOT arrest Assange in London. pnwmom Aug 2012 #66
Wrong again. Interpol has nothing to do with the EAW which every member of the EU can sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #67
Sweden cannot arrest Assange in London. Only UK police can do that, in response pnwmom Aug 2012 #72
The British arrested Assange in London, not the Swedes. hack89 Aug 2012 #84
You are lost again. The British had no reason to arrest him. He was arrested under an EAW sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #87
The British executed an European Arrest Warrant - and yes, they were required to honor it. hack89 Aug 2012 #89
What exactly is your point? Yes they did, which means Sweden CAN get their man sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #93
So the Swedes had physical custody of Assange? Because that is what arrest means to most people hack89 Aug 2012 #94
Apparently they don't want him in Sweden or they would have detained him sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #98
Considering he left the day before his scheduled interview with Swedish prosecutors hack89 Aug 2012 #100
No, did not. The women's lawyer has even confirmed that he was free to leave Sweden sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #104
His lawyer testified under oath that he was notified of the interview 6 days before he left hack89 Aug 2012 #105
The lawyer is not Assange. The lawyer explained why he missed the messages, sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #106
He testified that he had a phone call with the prosecutor hack89 Aug 2012 #107
Again with the cut and paste of this discredited author? girl gone mad Aug 2012 #57
He hasn't been discredited. Someone disagreed with him pnwmom Aug 2012 #73
Here is information about the Interpol Arrest Warrant that was issued for Assange. pnwmom Aug 2012 #61
Why doesn't Sweden interview Assange in London? (Anya Palmer) struggle4progress Aug 2012 #70
He has been arrested in London, with an EAW from the Swedish prosecutor. He was jailed sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #45
Yes they can please stop spreading this false information around DU. It has been corrected sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #53
Surprising only to those not paying attention. - K&R :-/ n/t DeSwiss Aug 2012 #28
There's whole lotta to digest tama Aug 2012 #32
K&R. We need to remember why there is a smear campaign against Assange nt magical thyme Aug 2012 #47
None of which should have come as a revelation Prophet 451 Aug 2012 #62
Stop the presses! Who knew? DemocratsForProgress Aug 2012 #63
Afghanistan: The War Logs (WikiLeaks via The Guardian) bobthedrummer Aug 2012 #65
i'm gonna make a wild flying fuck of a guess: you don't remember nixon or reagan, do you? struggle4progress Aug 2012 #71
What a stupid reply. morningfog Aug 2012 #75
Maybe you just had to be there then to have any idea what I'm talking about struggle4progress Aug 2012 #81
What the hell are you even trying to say? You should just say it. morningfog Aug 2012 #83
OP says: Wikileaks revealed to us how much government lies to us. I say: if OP learned that struggle4progress Aug 2012 #85
Which implies we should get used to it and aren't privy to know the truth. morningfog Aug 2012 #86
Huh? struggle4progress Aug 2012 #91
Duh. morningfog Aug 2012 #96
OP says that Wikileaks revealed specific war crimes. Not one of them has been addressed sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #88
. Wilms Aug 2012 #74
Our Government Lies to Us???? goodword Aug 2012 #76
du rec. Nt xchrom Aug 2012 #92
yes--and are any of those murderers being prosecuted? No, the guy who told us about the crimes librechik Aug 2012 #97
The biggest lie goes unspoken here ... Eddie Haskell Aug 2012 #99
Bookmarked Generic Other Aug 2012 #102
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WikiLeaks' Most Terrifyin...»Reply #83