Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Wikileaks wouldn't exist if money wasn't the driving force for just about everything organized 2on2u Aug 2012 #1
I am wondering how bad it has to get before the people strike out. rhett o rick Aug 2012 #2
That's Just What Our Government Thinks, Too goodword Aug 2012 #77
Sad thing though is that usually all they end up doing is fighting their own johnlucas Aug 2012 #79
I agree that revolutions will only replace one set of masters with another. rhett o rick Aug 2012 #103
...and there are some that are still Flogging Hillary for VP formercia Aug 2012 #3
Hillary did not act alone. bvar22 Aug 2012 #58
Yes. My biggest problem with Obama is not his economic or foreign policies. It is 1monster Aug 2012 #80
Read War is a Racket sometime. hootinholler Aug 2012 #4
I need to read it, as well as a few others... rwsanders Aug 2012 #9
Lots of good info here... hootinholler Aug 2012 #29
"...the hidden reason for our entry into Vietnam." KansDem Aug 2012 #30
Cheney and Koch seem to be orchestrating much of the Romney/Walker installations, and so this info. midnight Aug 2012 #42
Capitalism doesn't naturally seek innovation in the traditional sense Hydra Aug 2012 #59
Without the Brown bros LBJ would never have run for office dixiegrrrrl Aug 2012 #95
If you needed wikileaks to realize that... then you must be very young CabCurious Aug 2012 #5
But now it's more than just "realizing" Wednesdays Aug 2012 #6
Did you know that you are using the talking point invented by Stratfor to try to diminish sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #8
I'm waiting for the info. on the bankers... I can't imagine how much worse it could be, but it must midnight Aug 2012 #12
I think they have succeeded in stopping the Bank leaks unfortunately. sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #43
Other familiar RW talking point tama Aug 2012 #35
That was the strategy settled on as revealed in the Stratfor emails. sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #40
Most who spread it tama Aug 2012 #46
Well we did find out from Wikileaks a few things we could not have imagined in 2008 sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #10
What's so terrible about US officials advocating for Boeing airplanes? pnwmom Aug 2012 #21
And so much more. Thank you for this OP. Flooding DU with anti-Wikileaks spam is sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #7
Yeah, and most of DU is sick of it fascisthunter Aug 2012 #14
Obama administration violates Geneva Convention against torture. OnyxCollie Aug 2012 #11
It's hard to see why the law is side stepped when it's quit clear that we can't be in the business midnight Aug 2012 #15
Well that was certainly spam treestar Aug 2012 #20
So what? Le Taz Hot Aug 2012 #68
"This isn't some fucking football game" They_Live Aug 2012 #78
So who will you vote for then? treestar Aug 2012 #108
We had so much hope of seeing the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld liars and criminals finally sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #22
Not to mention the financial crimes Eddie Haskell Aug 2012 #101
Never pass up an opportunity to bash Obama, eh? The Doctor. Aug 2012 #48
Post removed Post removed Aug 2012 #69
How could we secretly bomb a place treestar Aug 2012 #13
I'm sure many folks did notice..... I think the secret part is not reporting it... midnight Aug 2012 #17
So AP and the NYT and the Yemen Times missed it? treestar Aug 2012 #19
I'm sure a lot of average people read those Ash_F Aug 2012 #31
The cover story was that Yemen's military had bombed a place in Yemen kenny blankenship Aug 2012 #44
Do you think that members of the Bush administration who lied this country into sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #23
What a creepy government we have fascisthunter Aug 2012 #16
About the allegations made against Julian Assange: pnwmom Aug 2012 #18
This OP appears to be about the Bush war crimes. What does Assange's personal sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #24
If that is how it appears to you, it's because you didn't read THE WHOLE THING. pnwmom Aug 2012 #25
This OP is about Wikileaks' revelations related to war crimes committed by the Bush sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #27
This OP says it's about how much our government lies to us, both concerning war crimes, pnwmom Aug 2012 #33
This OP is about how Wikileaks demonstrated with whistle blower leaks, how much our sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #41
Post removed Post removed Aug 2012 #49
All I can say is if anyone cares about this country they will focus on the reasons why sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #50
Sweden could at least question him in the UK GliderGuider Aug 2012 #26
They can't proceed with this particular type of "interview" pnwmom Aug 2012 #34
Could you point me to some support for that? GliderGuider Aug 2012 #36
I will look for it, but I can't remember off the top of my head pnwmom Aug 2012 #37
Okay, I've found something. It's discussed here in "Myth Four." pnwmom Aug 2012 #38
Thanks. That seems to settle that issue. nt GliderGuider Aug 2012 #39
Assange HAS been arrested in London, under a warrant issued by the Swedish Prosecutor. sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #51
No, nothing prevents Sweden from having an Interpol arrest of Assange in England, pnwmom Aug 2012 #52
So, they can place him under arrest in London GliderGuider Aug 2012 #54
It would be Interpol arresting him, and then extraditing him to Sweden. pnwmom Aug 2012 #56
No it wouldn't only be Interpo. Sweden is a member of the EU. All members of the EU can issue an EAW sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #90
The Swedes didn't arrest Assange in London - the Brits did. nt hack89 Aug 2012 #82
It was not an Interpol arrest warrant. . sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #55
Wrong. Here is the official notice of the Arrest Warrant Issued by Interpol pnwmom Aug 2012 #60
You said that Sweden could not arrest Assange in London. That was clearly false. sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #64
You're still wrong. Sweden could NOT arrest Assange in London. pnwmom Aug 2012 #66
Wrong again. Interpol has nothing to do with the EAW which every member of the EU can sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #67
Sweden cannot arrest Assange in London. Only UK police can do that, in response pnwmom Aug 2012 #72
The British arrested Assange in London, not the Swedes. hack89 Aug 2012 #84
You are lost again. The British had no reason to arrest him. He was arrested under an EAW sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #87
The British executed an European Arrest Warrant - and yes, they were required to honor it. hack89 Aug 2012 #89
What exactly is your point? Yes they did, which means Sweden CAN get their man sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #93
So the Swedes had physical custody of Assange? Because that is what arrest means to most people hack89 Aug 2012 #94
Apparently they don't want him in Sweden or they would have detained him sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #98
Considering he left the day before his scheduled interview with Swedish prosecutors hack89 Aug 2012 #100
No, did not. The women's lawyer has even confirmed that he was free to leave Sweden sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #104
His lawyer testified under oath that he was notified of the interview 6 days before he left hack89 Aug 2012 #105
The lawyer is not Assange. The lawyer explained why he missed the messages, sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #106
He testified that he had a phone call with the prosecutor hack89 Aug 2012 #107
Again with the cut and paste of this discredited author? girl gone mad Aug 2012 #57
He hasn't been discredited. Someone disagreed with him pnwmom Aug 2012 #73
Here is information about the Interpol Arrest Warrant that was issued for Assange. pnwmom Aug 2012 #61
Why doesn't Sweden interview Assange in London? (Anya Palmer) struggle4progress Aug 2012 #70
He has been arrested in London, with an EAW from the Swedish prosecutor. He was jailed sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #45
Yes they can please stop spreading this false information around DU. It has been corrected sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #53
Surprising only to those not paying attention. - K&R :-/ n/t DeSwiss Aug 2012 #28
There's whole lotta to digest tama Aug 2012 #32
K&R. We need to remember why there is a smear campaign against Assange nt magical thyme Aug 2012 #47
None of which should have come as a revelation Prophet 451 Aug 2012 #62
Stop the presses! Who knew? DemocratsForProgress Aug 2012 #63
Afghanistan: The War Logs (WikiLeaks via The Guardian) bobthedrummer Aug 2012 #65
i'm gonna make a wild flying fuck of a guess: you don't remember nixon or reagan, do you? struggle4progress Aug 2012 #71
What a stupid reply. morningfog Aug 2012 #75
Maybe you just had to be there then to have any idea what I'm talking about struggle4progress Aug 2012 #81
What the hell are you even trying to say? You should just say it. morningfog Aug 2012 #83
OP says: Wikileaks revealed to us how much government lies to us. I say: if OP learned that struggle4progress Aug 2012 #85
Which implies we should get used to it and aren't privy to know the truth. morningfog Aug 2012 #86
Huh? struggle4progress Aug 2012 #91
Duh. morningfog Aug 2012 #96
OP says that Wikileaks revealed specific war crimes. Not one of them has been addressed sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #88
. Wilms Aug 2012 #74
Our Government Lies to Us???? goodword Aug 2012 #76
du rec. Nt xchrom Aug 2012 #92
yes--and are any of those murderers being prosecuted? No, the guy who told us about the crimes librechik Aug 2012 #97
The biggest lie goes unspoken here ... Eddie Haskell Aug 2012 #99
Bookmarked Generic Other Aug 2012 #102
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WikiLeaks' Most Terrifyin...»Reply #16