Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
6. GOOD POINT!!! Please remind us all of the link to here statement so that
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 10:32 PM
Jan 2012

the PURISTS will see how RIDICULOUS, PUNY and INCREASINGLY IRRELEVANT they are.

This will go well. n/t racaulk Jan 2012 #1
Rather her run for Senate in case we lose Nelson's seat, she will most likely beat Brown. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #61
Heh. Brickbat Jan 2012 #2
I'm sure the fact that she said she didn't want it had NOTHING to do with it. nt TheWraith Jan 2012 #3
GOOD POINT!!! Please remind us all of the link to here statement so that MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #6
gold, jerry.. frylock Jan 2012 #59
She did want it. She did the hard work of putting it together. RC Jan 2012 #16
She might have wanted it before we gave her an obstructing congress, but after that, it was clear... joshcryer Jan 2012 #24
The Republicans knew she would do a good job and did everything they could to block her nomination. RC Jan 2012 #30
The Republicans hate the CFPB and Warren would've been obstructed for years. joshcryer Jan 2012 #36
And Warren said this herself? Or was someone speaking for her? MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #38
The quoted words are hers. Do you think she wanted to run a neutered organization? joshcryer Jan 2012 #41
Let me get this straight. We shouldnt appoint anyone the republicons dont like because rhett o rick Jan 2012 #46
No, she was never nominated, she was appointed to run a new agency. The agency itself... joshcryer Jan 2012 #49
Your post #36 implies that she shouldnt have been nominated because of the rhett o rick Jan 2012 #51
We don't really know how it went down in the back room discussions. joshcryer Jan 2012 #55
Yeah, there's that little detail. CakeGrrl Jan 2012 #54
Don't confuse 'em with facts... SidDithers Jan 2012 #62
This message was self-deleted by its author DJ13 Jan 2012 #4
What are you talking about? She has to clean up after little Snottiescottie. lonestarnot Jan 2012 #5
She has moved on, and so should you nt ecstatic Jan 2012 #7
Who are the Purists? n/t Lisa D Jan 2012 #8
I think that he means those who value principles over principals. AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2012 #69
They can't pull their heads out of their butts. bluestate10 Jan 2012 #9
She didn't want it, Barny Frank said as much, and her Senate run proves she didn't want it. joshcryer Jan 2012 #10
She had ample opportunity to say it herself. MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #12
yeah, she just decided since she has no job she might as well run for Senate JI7 Jan 2012 #13
Maybe Ms. Warren never attended the "never an unspoken thought" school. Dewey Finn Jan 2012 #17
Good point, here's some videos demonstrating her shy side MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #22
So you believe that Dewey Finn Jan 2012 #66
Did you *see* the Oversite Committee for Warren? She did *not* have to put up with their garbage... joshcryer Jan 2012 #20
You don't think Ms. Warren can speak for herself? MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #26
She already has. joshcryer Jan 2012 #33
Great! Show us a link. MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #40
Sure: joshcryer Jan 2012 #42
Just to be perfectly clear, Manny. She has *already done what she wanted to do*. joshcryer Jan 2012 #47
I think she's going to be more effective as MA's next Senator, anyway Terra Alta Jan 2012 #11
I hope so. My concern is that she'll MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #18
Some folks just can't handle good news. JTFrog Jan 2012 #14
Some folks are highly amused by certain good news MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #15
A fella sure can be amusing. JTFrog Jan 2012 #21
You should have posted this yesterday MFrohike Jan 2012 #19
He was too busy. Major Hogwash Jan 2012 #25
My post is sarcasm MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #27
And now I feel dumb MFrohike Jan 2012 #43
Don't. It's tough to tell reality from fiction on DU these days nt MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #53
I've seen enough of your posts to know this slay Jan 2012 #57
And who says America doesn't manufacture anything anymore ... BEHOLD ... JoePhilly Jan 2012 #23
Soft kitty, warm kitty, Lisa D Jan 2012 #28
Didn't you hear? He just appointed Richard Cordray JohnnyRingo Jan 2012 #29
The sad reality is that Cordray is no Warren. girl gone mad Jan 2012 #50
I think you should google Mr. Cordray. PragmaticLiberal Jan 2012 #52
Bingo. Rich Cordray is not just some guy. He actually was in the trenches. Ikonoklast Jan 2012 #65
Cordray could be the second coming of Christ intent on driving out the money lenders Dewey Finn Jan 2012 #67
I'm from Ohio JohnnyRingo Jan 2012 #70
We need Elizabeth Warren in the Senate. JDPriestly Jan 2012 #31
This masterpiece took four edits? Robb Jan 2012 #32
Nice. joshcryer Jan 2012 #34
LOL JohnnyRingo Jan 2012 #35
If I were smarter and a better writer, then it would have taken fewer. MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #37
Nah, it's difficult to make a sarcastic, derisive post, that maybe will pass scrutiny and has... joshcryer Jan 2012 #39
Wow. I smelled that from over here. Missy Vixen Jan 2012 #45
I did. I've yet to be convinced Warren wanted to sit on a neutered organization... joshcryer Jan 2012 #48
ROFL!!... SidDithers Jan 2012 #63
Winning. girl gone mad Jan 2012 #44
She knew she'd be a lighning rod and so did Obama Canuckistanian Jan 2012 #56
I'm certain if she wanted to she could've got the nomination. She already fought... joshcryer Jan 2012 #60
We feel your pain. onenote Jan 2012 #58
she's going to make a great senator fishwax Jan 2012 #64
There was no way ProSense Jan 2012 #68
Hey name caller. Stick it. mmonk Jan 2012 #71
It's ok. I'll deal with it since I want her as my Senator. n/t PhoenixAbove Jan 2012 #72
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hey purists: there's NO W...»Reply #6