HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Meanwhile, Ecuador prepar... » Reply #39
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Response to Poll_Blind (Reply #19)

Sun Aug 19, 2012, 05:32 PM

39. Marianne Nye has lied about this. There is no Swedish law that prevented

her from questioning Assange, first in Sweden when he asked daily to speak to her and she refused, and then from London which she again consistently refused to do. She claimed there were 'legal impediments', but this turned out not to be the case.

She has also been asked why, after two years, she has failed to file charges. Her circular arguments have been noted by legal experts everywhere, leading many people to believe that she never intended to file charges, but did intend to keep him under house arrest in London for as long as possible.

Her next excuse was that she could not arrest him even if she did speak to him London. Considering that she already had him arrested after issuing the EAW, and that he was out on bail from that arrest, that too was a lie.

But if people took the trouble to look at her 'evidence', they might begin to understand why she is so reluctant to file charges. The exculpatory evidence in this case, NOT published on a daily basis by the press, is mountainous. Starting with texts between the women, 'plotting to make money' by 'destroying his reputation' eg, and much much more. So long as she refuses to charge him, she can continue to refuse to turn that evidence over to the Defense. The Defense did finally get to see some of it, but were denied the right to make copies.

Once the actual evidence, not the ever-changing allegations from the women's original, and recorded statements to the police, is viewed by the public, she is going to have an awful lot of questions to answer. Eg, there are many witnesses who gave testimony, most of it does not bolster her case especially coincided with the women's own words, which they tried to scrub from the internet but not before bloggers saw them and/or screen capped them, making it impossible for those damning texts to go away.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 57 replies Author Time Post
Robb Aug 2012 OP
tama Aug 2012 #1
Robb Aug 2012 #12
tama Aug 2012 #17
MADem Aug 2012 #27
tama Aug 2012 #29
MADem Aug 2012 #33
tama Aug 2012 #37
MADem Aug 2012 #44
tama Aug 2012 #47
MADem Aug 2012 #50
Downwinder Aug 2012 #2
MADem Aug 2012 #3
leveymg Aug 2012 #4
Robb Aug 2012 #6
riderinthestorm Aug 2012 #7
Robb Aug 2012 #9
riderinthestorm Aug 2012 #18
Robb Aug 2012 #34
riderinthestorm Aug 2012 #36
MADem Aug 2012 #23
riderinthestorm Aug 2012 #25
MADem Aug 2012 #31
riderinthestorm Aug 2012 #32
MADem Aug 2012 #38
riderinthestorm Aug 2012 #40
MADem Aug 2012 #46
Robb Aug 2012 #48
MADem Aug 2012 #49
JDPriestly Aug 2012 #52
JDPriestly Aug 2012 #51
riderinthestorm Aug 2012 #5
Bodhi BloodWave Aug 2012 #30
Poll_Blind Aug 2012 #8
Robb Aug 2012 #10
Poll_Blind Aug 2012 #19
Robb Aug 2012 #26
julian09 Aug 2012 #28
LineLineLineLineReply Marianne Nye has lied about this. There is no Swedish law that prevented
sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #39
treestar Aug 2012 #13
Poll_Blind Aug 2012 #15
tama Aug 2012 #22
MADem Aug 2012 #24
sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #41
MADem Aug 2012 #43
treestar Aug 2012 #11
Robb Aug 2012 #14
sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #16
tama Aug 2012 #20
HiPointDem Aug 2012 #21
TorchTheWitch Aug 2012 #35
MADem Aug 2012 #45
SidDithers Aug 2012 #42
Robb Aug 2012 #53
mediafibs Aug 2012 #54
mediafibs Aug 2012 #55
Robb Aug 2012 #56
sandieg Dec 2013 #57
Please login to view edit histories.