HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » 5 Things Mitt Doesn't Wan... » Reply #2

Reply #2


Response to cal04 (Original post)

Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:48 PM

2. The basic assumption is the haves have because they DESERVE all that they have, i.e. Prosperity

Gospel, and because they deserve to have, it is their responsibility to tell those who do not have what they are allowed to have.

HOW do we address this set of assumptions?

The only thing I see out there that addresses this is the moral approach that the Nuns On A Bus are doing.

There is another way, isn't there?

How do we address these assumptions, not as the Prosperity Gospel, not within the milieu of religion, but as economics?

The only thing I can think of is Supply vs. Demand side economics, but I'm wondering if there aren't more ways to talk about these assumptions.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 3 replies Author Time Post
cal04 Aug 2012 OP
Zax2me Aug 2012 #1
LineNew Reply The basic assumption is the haves have because they DESERVE all that they have, i.e. Prosperity
patrice Aug 2012 #2
Doctor Jack Aug 2012 #3
Please login to view edit histories.