Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
14. Yup, and there is also a fact we are familiar with
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:12 PM
Aug 2012

Grannies for peace, infiltrated by the FBI as a dangerous group...militias...well, what can I say?

Laws do not prevent investigations, and those were stopped...for the most part, with exceptions like Hutare, they are left alone.

We've noticed.

Most gun hobbyists I know Harmony Blue Aug 2012 #1
Why I said it is a very small and chiefly loud and well connected, group nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #3
Indeed Harmony Blue Aug 2012 #13
Hmm..... deaniac21 Aug 2012 #66
For pete's sake! Let the story be told before MineralMan Aug 2012 #2
Why should the OP not offer her opinion on a news story? All anyone not interested has to do sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #67
And why should I not offer my opinion on her OP? MineralMan Aug 2012 #72
But you did not answer the question. You basically took it upon yourself to sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #79
Here's some of the story MNBrewer Aug 2012 #103
why not wait until we find out who the shooter is, he may be militia, maybe not loli phabay Aug 2012 #4
After OKC they had a clear line of connection and responsibitly nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #5
i think that might be due to a thing called laws, its kinda difficult to shut people down who dont loli phabay Aug 2012 #11
Yup, and there is also a fact we are familiar with nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #14
uh, right wing militias have been infiltrated by the feds cali Aug 2012 #17
I think the op is saying the gov't should do more to counter dangerous right-wing hate groups. limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #57
Post removed Post removed Aug 2012 #20
Power Elites always create their own destructors.... Junkdrawer Aug 2012 #6
There are also parallels to Te 1917 revolution. nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #8
Profound malaise Aug 2012 #18
More French Revolution Parallels.... Junkdrawer Aug 2012 #24
Love that quote you said. Fantastic Anarchist Aug 2012 #71
deal with militias in what way? cali Aug 2012 #7
I think it's a Lord of the Rings reference petronius Aug 2012 #16
Ah, thanks. cali Aug 2012 #22
But the report from DHS early malaise Aug 2012 #9
Yup. nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #10
exactly how do you mean deal with them, i get concerned with language like that loli phabay Aug 2012 #12
Enjoy the whirlwind nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #15
lol. cali Aug 2012 #19
i was like wtf, no idea what that was about loli phabay Aug 2012 #26
"this is not just about guns... but ... a culture" lunatica Aug 2012 #21
We are at the mercy of the murdering, raging gun freaks.... 99Forever Aug 2012 #23
Is this analysis based on your experiences pintobean Aug 2012 #25
wow. cali Aug 2012 #27
Not my find pintobean Aug 2012 #31
oddly enough, it's not this sort of thing that irritates me so much cali Aug 2012 #35
I just started posting here yesterday and I already noticed that about her too. Ya Basta Aug 2012 #42
WTFF. Brickbat Aug 2012 #28
Don't you love how he ignores it? Pacafishmate Aug 2012 #40
She. pintobean Aug 2012 #43
LOL...Busted! Looks like someone's credibility has just been impeached. Ya Basta Aug 2012 #41
kick pintobean Aug 2012 #46
So. 2ndAmForComputers Aug 2012 #50
That's not troll hunting pintobean Aug 2012 #53
I went to the link. She did not claim to be a cop. Everyone should click through to see limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #58
Not really. She was asked by several people in that thread (including me) to clarify, and she SlimJimmy Aug 2012 #64
It does not need to be clarified. This is nothing but harassment. limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #74
No, a person can't click through and see what she was talking about. You are absolutely full of it. SlimJimmy Aug 2012 #84
Don't participate in stalking and harassment. limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #87
I asked a legitimate question in the thread and it was ignored for several months. What part of SlimJimmy Aug 2012 #88
Anybody can see the person did not claim to be a former cop. limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #89
What part of "I was part of the original thread" do you not get? I asked her *in* that thread SlimJimmy Aug 2012 #101
I get that. She was not claiming to be a former cop. That screenshot is out-of-context harassment. limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #105
You keep repeating this as if it's fact. SlimJimmy Aug 2012 #106
It's the same sleazy smear tactic Fox News uses limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #111
I can't make my position any clearer. You simply REFUSE to accept SlimJimmy Aug 2012 #112
Anyone can view the quote in context & judge for themself if the person was claiming to be an ex-cop limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #113
Exactly. She was not referring to herself, but her buddies on that 'other site' naturally sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #76
"As a former cop, I get it" zappaman Aug 2012 #78
You are wrong. Two people have now pointed out to you that you have completely misinterpreted sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #80
The 'former cop' she was referring to, btw, was the one mentioned in the comment she was responding sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #81
I agree, sabrina pinboy3niner Aug 2012 #82
Yes, I noticed that also when I read it which is why I did not think sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #92
As an actual ex-cop, not a pretend one, I took her comments as she wrote them. If, in fact, SlimJimmy Aug 2012 #85
This is stalking and harassment. It's also a lie. limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #59
Because most people won't click through. JoeyT Aug 2012 #61
Reading comprehension fail. JoeyT Aug 2012 #60
Well, at least she answered the question I've been asking her since April. SlimJimmy Aug 2012 #62
Except when she says she was. zappaman Aug 2012 #69
I have to agree. If she was talking about someone else, she would have said "he", not I. SlimJimmy Aug 2012 #70
Looks like you misunderstood her comment. sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #73
"As a former cop, I get it." zappaman Aug 2012 #75
No, you are incorrect and you should delete your misinterpretations of her comment. sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #77
I'm thinking Walter Mitty, not Lara Croft...nt SidDithers Aug 2012 #90
Ben Stiller is remaking the movie....but I love the Danny Kaye one. msanthrope Aug 2012 #102
Fairly harsh just because someone does not meet your social norms Riftaxe Aug 2012 #29
Mark my words. This will be another lone wolf attack nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #32
The sun will rise tomorrow Riftaxe Aug 2012 #34
None of us is doing that nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #36
If this shooter had ever attended an Occupy Wall St. protest 99th_Monkey Aug 2012 #30
Or a member of the Granny's for Peace group. nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #33
You mean the way something like this was buried DBoon Aug 2012 #37
Yup nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #38
Oh for fuck sake Ya Basta Aug 2012 #39
Yup, because we all know there is zero evidence of the true intent of militias nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #47
Thanks pintobean Aug 2012 #48
Just up-thread when you said you'd only been here two days I was gonna ask if TheManInTheMac Aug 2012 #52
I thought she seemed like the combative type but wasn't sure because I haven't been here long Ya Basta Aug 2012 #56
I don't believe in someone's right that's not part of the military or law enforcement... Comrade_McKenzie Aug 2012 #44
Thank you for your enlightenment. revolution breeze Aug 2012 #45
I believe we have militia crazies in the military fascisthunter Aug 2012 #49
Good point! They finally have to give this issue some MSM time flamingdem Aug 2012 #51
Why the rush. No facts yet. emilyg Aug 2012 #54
Actually we have a few facts already nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #55
Emily here are more facts nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #63
Nailed it again malaise Aug 2012 #65
A "general statement"? zappaman Aug 2012 #68
Ah come on, society needs more bigoted gun lovers getting together for fun and politics? Hoyt Aug 2012 #83
Well lets just say that unit will not survice contact nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #86
If Timothy McVeigh had a partner, how was he a lone wolf?...nt SidDithers Aug 2012 #91
Well Sid... zappaman Aug 2012 #93
You missed the point completely. None ever are 'lone wolves', but that is how they are portrayed sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #94
"None ever are 'lone wolves" zappaman Aug 2012 #95
Sure, but those who commit murder for political reasons rarely are lone wolves. sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #96
Like today's shooting? zappaman Aug 2012 #97
'Acting alone' and 'lone wolf' are two different things. He clearly was not a lone wolf, he had sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #98
"Lone wolf means someone who had no friends" zappaman Aug 2012 #100
Try the dictionary for starters ... sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #107
Define 'rarely' RZM Aug 2012 #99
And that is her point, which you just made for her. sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #108
Cue our Rightists to defend their pals. nt onehandle Aug 2012 #104
It's kind of ironic that while denouncing these violent lone wolf types Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2012 #109
Democracy Now has a great story on this Taverner Aug 2012 #110
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This is a general stateme...»Reply #14