Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The "Well Regulated Militia" clause in plain English and other liberal Constitutional musings [View all]villager
(26,001 posts)5. well, I certainly appreciate the invitation to discuss!
Rare as it is in this particular debate!
Also shocked not to be considered an "extremist," since it seems the dialectic here trends toward calling any sensible regulation "extreme."
I do believe in an outright ban on weapons designed solely to kill humans (don't tell me you need a 100-round clip to shred deer in the woods...) And no, the Founding Fathers did not anticipate weapons of war in crowded urban areas...
However, hunting rifles, pistols, etc., can all stay -- though amassing them at alarming rates tends to be a red flag, certainly of a psychological state, if not some impending outright danger to the community...
cheers!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The "Well Regulated Militia" clause in plain English and other liberal Constitutional musings [View all]
appal_jack
Jul 2012
OP
So the parts you like have stayed the same, and the parts you don't like have changed...
villager
Jul 2012
#1
Arms are not even a little bit regulated. not anywhere near as regulated as they need to become.
robinlynne
Jul 2012
#29
Scalia? seriously? undoubtedly? Scalia puts words into Thomas Jefferson's mouth?
robinlynne
Jul 2012
#30
what do you say to people like me who think the whole 2nd amendment should be abandoned?
CTyankee
Jul 2012
#7
Oh, I don't need your advice, Pave. Just pointing out how out of touch WE really are here.
CTyankee
Jul 2012
#12
do you think it is the second ammendment that is allowing the rest of the world to pass us by
Tuesday Afternoon
Jul 2012
#15
No, I don't and it isn't. I was just using this as a point. It is more than that as Justice Ginsburg
CTyankee
Jul 2012
#20
if you don't and it isn't why did you see the need to go on? as for your questions
Tuesday Afternoon
Jul 2012
#28
I told him why we have an unworkable constitution today. It was what we had in the past and
CTyankee
Jul 2012
#23
you said "whims of the few." I was pointing out that women make up a slight majority. You have
CTyankee
Jul 2012
#69
Justice Ginsburgh said that if she were to advise a new democracy she would recommend the
CTyankee
Jul 2012
#17
You have so rightly described the problem, appal jack! The lack of specificity in our
CTyankee
Jul 2012
#26
silly. I have one grandson and will have another in mid January. Why wouldn't I want for them
CTyankee
Jul 2012
#68
I say write your Senators and Representatives and ask them to initiate an amendment to repeal it
slackmaster
Jul 2012
#21
Of course. See my other posts in this threads about the deficiencies in our Constitution and
CTyankee
Jul 2012
#24
It is worth emphasizing what you said about "Democratic leaders such as Bill Clinton"
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#38
the right to self defense with a firearm is not mentioned at all in the constitution.
robinlynne
Jul 2012
#45
Glad to see that as your position. Do you who John Locke was? Do you understand the philosophy
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#48