General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A not so well regulated militia of one just killed twelve souls and wounded seventy people. [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)First of all, that post appears to me made by a disruptor.
Second, As soon as posters espousing the viewpoints that "you shouldn't need a background check, a waiting period, or any permit at all as long as you used any gun on private property" come anywhere near the number of those that express the "ban them all" sentiment - they might actuallty be representative of something.
Lets both just do a count and see how many of each we come up with here on DU.
I'm willing if you are. You game? Or will you simply concede that people espousing that viewpoint are not representative of pro-gun posters by and large here at DU, and that you were misrepresenting "those folks" as if they were.
"I posted it uplink. That little sign posted by the theater has no force of law in Colorado."
Are you really inferring that the theater can not lawfully tell someone to leave because they're breaking the establishments rules, and have them arrested for tresspassing if they don't?
Really? That MUST be the case for what you claim to be truth.
Is it?
"It's similar to the "we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone" signs. Mean nothing at all legally."
Oh, you mean a business in general, can't just decide to tell someone to leave their property and have that person arrested for tresspassing when they refuse
Really?
Really? That MUST be the case for what you claim to be truth.
Is it?
And finally, you didn't answer the question:
I'd support a law that would require any place that deems itself "gun free" to actually take measure such as metal detectors and monitored doors, to actually ensure such a "gun free result.
Would you?
In case you don't realise it, this is a pro-gun poster advancing an idea to prevent just the sort of tragedy that happened in colorado from happening.
Are you gonna sign on with it, or at least comment on it, or would you rather be like so many others on the anti-gun side of this debate, and rail against those unreasonable gun folks that wont budge an inch to do anything to stop tragedys like this?