Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

-..__...

(7,776 posts)

34. "Short stay"? "Uhhmm, dude...

Reply to Odin2005 (Reply #31)

Sun Jul 22, 2012, 05:02 PM

Jul 2012

I've been here longer than you have.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If we have drug testing for people on welfare, why not drug testing on gun purchasers too? [View all] nanabugg Jul 2012 OP

TWO wrongs do not make a right. Tejas Jul 2012 #1

It would stop a lot of people from purchasing guns since they love their drugs more. nanabugg Jul 2012 #2

Let's review: Gun Bans, Drug Wars.......... Tejas Jul 2012 #5

Good grief! Mojorabbit Jul 2012 #16

Weird huh? Tejas Jul 2012 #19

You people are killing me... -..__... Jul 2012 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Jul 2012 #10

This message was self-deleted by its author Odin2005 Jul 2012 #31

"Short stay"? "Uhhmm, dude... -..__... Jul 2012 #34

makes a lot of sense, and other quinnox Jul 2012 #4

I bet you have a plan to stop drunk-driving fatalities too. Tejas Jul 2012 #6

drunk driving fatalities have decreased sharply with the mopinko Jul 2012 #9

zinger! That must have left a mark... CTyankee Jul 2012 #13

10,000 fatalities is "working quite well"? Tejas Jul 2012 #14

The numbers... sarisataka Jul 2012 #17

Great idea for gun insurance Progressive dog Jul 2012 #27

thank you quinnox Jul 2012 #29

Excellent idea!!! JDPriestly Jul 2012 #30

So sayeth the insurance corp lobbyists. Tejas Jul 2012 #36

Interesting thought Gman Jul 2012 #7

Voters, too. Why not testing before people go to vote. n/t hughee99 Jul 2012 #8

people don't kill while exercising their right to vote. CTyankee Jul 2012 #12

They certainly can put in place others who will though 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #20

What about those sarisataka Jul 2012 #21

since the vote is secret, it would be awfully hard to nab just the perps who voted for him CTyankee Jul 2012 #22

Not directly. hughee99 Jul 2012 #23

Sure - when the taxpayers start paying for my guns and ammo. No problem. nt hack89 Jul 2012 #11

Am I to read this correctly in that you approve of testing folks that are on welfare? Lionessa Jul 2012 #25

Hell no. hack89 Jul 2012 #26

Do you have insurance on your car? DainBramaged Jul 2012 #28

Didn't think I would need a sarcasm smilie hack89 Jul 2012 #35

I doubt many gun owners would have an issue with that. n-t Logical Jul 2012 #15

Or prior to voting . . . 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #18

Because it's wrong on both counts. Lionessa Jul 2012 #24

FASCISM! COMMUNISM! Taking away my FREE-DUMB!!! Odin2005 Jul 2012 #32

I am not surprised by the right-wingers who murielm99 Jul 2012 #33

I'm against any drug testing without probable cause! B Calm Jul 2012 #37

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If we have drug testing f...»Reply #34