HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Justice & Public Safety » Gun Control & RKBA (Group) » "Man Who Shot Aldi's...

Tue Feb 7, 2012, 11:07 AM

 

"Man Who Shot Aldi's Robber Won't Face Charges"

MILWAUKEE -- A Milwaukee man will not face any charges after shooting a robbery suspect at a Milwaukee grocery store.

On Friday, the Milwaukee County district attorney praised his actions.

Nazir Al-Mujaahid first told 12 News that when he saw a man holding up a sawed off shotgun threatening a cashier in Aldi's on Monday, he knew it was time to use his concealed carry training.

"There was a gentleman behind him. I nodded him to get out of the way. Thank God he saw and got out of the way, and that's when I had to fire at the gentleman," Al-Mujaahid said.

He fired six or seven times and is made it clear Friday that he stands by his actions.



More at link:
http://www.wisn.com/news/30374159/detail.html


Sounds like he did everything right and the DA has his head on straight.

20 replies, 2253 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 20 replies Author Time Post
Reply "Man Who Shot Aldi's Robber Won't Face Charges" (Original post)
PavePusher Feb 2012 OP
kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #1
PavePusher Feb 2012 #5
kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #6
Straw Man Feb 2012 #7
kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #8
Straw Man Feb 2012 #14
Simo 1939_1940 Feb 2012 #18
kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #9
Skwid Feb 2012 #11
Straw Man Feb 2012 #15
Marengo Feb 2012 #17
ellisonz Feb 2012 #19
SteveW Feb 2012 #20
DonP Feb 2012 #2
ileus Feb 2012 #3
richmwill Feb 2012 #4
Skwid Feb 2012 #10
rrneck Feb 2012 #13
aikoaiko Feb 2012 #12
discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2012 #16

Response to PavePusher (Original post)

Tue Feb 7, 2012, 11:38 AM

1. Appropriate gun use: restrained, but effective.

Too bad it seems to be the exception.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kestrel91316 (Reply #1)

Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:42 PM

5. Really? Cite your evidence? n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PavePusher (Reply #5)

Tue Feb 7, 2012, 02:35 PM

6. Please explain why I am required to cite "evidence" when

expressing MY OPINION.

(crickets chirping)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kestrel91316 (Reply #6)

Tue Feb 7, 2012, 02:58 PM

7. Opinion?

Too bad it seems to be the exception.

Please explain why I am required to cite "evidence" when

expressing MY OPINION.

The above is not an opinion. It's a statement of your perception of facts. On what observation do you base your "seems to be" conclusion?

An opinion would be an avowal without claim to evidence, as in "I think it's the exception."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Straw Man (Reply #7)

Tue Feb 7, 2012, 03:56 PM

8. My perception of facts is my own. I need not justify it to anyone,

least of all an opponent of the First Amendment such as yourself.

I'm pretty sure you'd be happier posting on a pro-gun website that allows no alternate opinions or questioning of the party line.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kestrel91316 (Reply #8)

Wed Feb 8, 2012, 02:11 AM

14. I beg your pardon?

My perception of facts is my own. I need not justify it to anyone,

least of all an opponent of the First Amendment such as yourself.

I have in no way denied your right to free speech. I merely pointed out that what you claim was opinion was actually phrased as an evidence-based statement of fact, yet you decline to identify that evidence.


I'm pretty sure you'd be happier posting on a pro-gun website that allows no alternate opinions or questioning of the party line.

I'm sure you'd be happier if I didn't question your particular version of the party line. Are you starting to see the irony here? First Amendment and all that?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kestrel91316 (Reply #8)

Wed Feb 8, 2012, 09:18 AM

18. "Everyone is entitled to their opinion."


This is the absurdly obvious line that is parroted all of the time.

The equally obviously follow-up that is understated:

An informed opinion trumps an uninformed opinion 365 days a year.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Straw Man (Reply #7)

Tue Feb 7, 2012, 03:57 PM

9. Wow. You're really new to this DU thing, I notice.

Do please review the TOS before attacking DUers for expressing their opinion.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kestrel91316 (Reply #9)

Tue Feb 7, 2012, 07:37 PM

11. How long does one have to be a participant here to get the right to be that condescending?

 

Just wondering.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kestrel91316 (Reply #9)

Wed Feb 8, 2012, 02:13 AM

15. And your point is ... ?

Do please review the TOS before attacking DUers for expressing their opinion.

There was no opinion, and there was no attack. I'm quite familiar with the TOS. If you have an issue with what I said, feel free to alert on it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kestrel91316 (Reply #6)

Wed Feb 8, 2012, 08:06 AM

17. What information is your opinion based on?

You are not required to provide evidence, but doing so does contribute considerable credibility to your opinion.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kestrel91316 (Reply #1)

Wed Feb 8, 2012, 03:07 PM

19. Welcome to the Inquisition!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kestrel91316 (Reply #1)

Wed Feb 8, 2012, 03:19 PM

20. Respectfully, why do you consider this incident an "exception?" nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PavePusher (Original post)

Tue Feb 7, 2012, 11:44 AM

2. Probably one of those wannabe cowboy, gun totin rednecks we hear about ... oh wait.

Never mind.

The irony is palpable on this story, considering many of the posts and comments when Wisconsin passed CCW.

As my father says, Mr. Al-Mujaahid sounds like he has his head screwed on right. It's nice to hear the DA is praising his actions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PavePusher (Original post)

Tue Feb 7, 2012, 11:52 AM

3. Only thing he did wrong was addressing him as a gentleman instead of goblin.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PavePusher (Original post)

Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:11 PM

4. I stand by Mr. Al-Mujaahid's actions too...

Well done, Sir. Thank you for making our streets safer.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PavePusher (Original post)


Response to Skwid (Reply #10)

Wed Feb 8, 2012, 01:22 AM

13. Wishing death on people is generally considered

poor form. You might consider an edit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PavePusher (Original post)

Tue Feb 7, 2012, 07:47 PM

12. Mr. Al-Mujaahid is clearly an agent of NRA thuggery and a hidden criminal!


So hidden that even when his actions are scrutinized by police and the DA, no crime was detected.








Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aikoaiko (Reply #12)

Wed Feb 8, 2012, 03:26 AM

16. Well it's too big...

...of a coincidence that there is no evidence whatsoever of wrong doing. That obviously means that there is an NRA conspiracy going on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread