Hillary Clinton super PAC launched

FUCK YEAH!!!!


Give 'em hell, Hillary!!!

smear her in any way possible while she hangs out by the pool on a nice, long and well earned vacation.
I can't wait to kick in my first donation and slap on my first car magnet!

right now, lol.
Lot's of hand wringing, crying and wetting of pants as well.

I'm not knocking Hillary but we just had an inauguration for fuck's sake.

Couldn't we wait a little bit? February maybe?

I personally don't want Hillary as the nominee. The Clintons corporatism and triangulation make for a ton of Republican achievements. Ask the GOP how Free Trade Agreements, Media Deregulation and Glass Stegall are working for them.

No Thanks.

As Black explained herself, they are doing this on their own. They are not part of "Hillaryland". Although, I see nothing wrong with it. Supporters of other potential candidates can do the same if they choose.

Hilary has said she won't run. She has health problems. She is 'old school' politics. Anyone donating to a SuperPAC on her behalf is just wasting their money.

Her current health problems are temporary and today in her "townterview" she didn't close the door on running. She just wants to rest and think about it.

show for it. They are already gerrymandering away and talking about Jeb Bush with not a whiff of "it's too early" by the Republicans or Fox News. No, it's not too early...OK, maybe February.,

The old gang is starting to gather. It'll be like old times. In the next couple of years more groups will come together. We'll all be waiting for Hillary's decision and hoping that she does choose to run in 2016. Like she keeps saying about wanting grandchildren, no pressure.....but.......

Seriously...I think Chelsea would rather have her Mother as President than have her home with the baby. Chelsea knows how important this is to Hillary...her life's dream.

Of course there was more than one person who wanted to know if she was going to run for president, but what a German student in the BBC of London's studio said, resonated with me. The girl asked her the same question, but added that seeing Hillary become the first US president would be a great symbol for girls and women around the world.

I see right on this OP several people complaining that Hillary is not "progressive" enough, but forgetting what she means to many people around the world. For example, I remember when she went to Cambodia and made a point of visiting a girl's orphanage. Every girl there had been made to work in the sex trade from a very young age and now they were protected and getting an education. Just by her mere presence, the plight of these girls received wide publicity and the government couldn't hide them under the rug. Similar stories abound.

Just think of how much more she'll do for women around the world once she's our president. She will literally change the world as we know it and go down in history as the one responsible for it.

Don't we need someone who's willing to be more progressive?


rocktivity

Today's corporatocracy...totally bipartisan. Think SCOTUS. It helps.

Who else could beat Bush, Rubio or Christy? Don't know how you can't love her as most do.
The only thing that would make me unhappy is if she chose not to run. I'd literally be in tears. and afraid for women and our country. scared:

The same pride that AA feel about Obama is the pride that many girls and women in the US and around the world feel about Hillary. Besides, she's one tough cookie and would be kicking Republican butt just like she did last week. That alone would make me yearn for a Hillary presidency.

Actually I was depressed. I didn't think we/I'd ever see a woman president. It took falling in love with Obama and getting on the bandwagon that snapped my out of it. Remember the Puma's?

As for Obama, I must be frank, I never fell in "love" with him. I tolerate him more than I used to, but "love"? Nope.

Remember, we have an open primary. Your candidate has an equal chance to win if the votes are there.

Smearing our best hope for eight more years in the White House doesn't make much sense unless you have someone to replace her with.

a viable alternative.

Joaguin, too, although he may be busy turning Texas Purple, then Blue. And Mama Rosa Castro is one fine old-school Chicana. Bring Bill and of course Obama into the equation ... Democrats Dream Ticket and Support Group.

candidacy is that if it actually happens, it means we'll have had no one new running, no one new in government really, no actual new ideas in a generation or more.

I respect this woman a great deal, but isn't it time for someone new?

We will have a primary.

Fortunately, many out there in the real world (and I mean world) disagree.

Ever thought of changing your nick to antiHillary?

Yawn........

I suppose there are many people who believe that 'new' is always inherently better. New Coke, Windows 8, Star Wars. Bumper stickers and 10-second bullet points are fine for them I suppose.

Clinton had the nomination all sewn up.

Whose second inauguration did we just have?

No one is saying that anyone's candidacy is a sure thing, but if Hillary chooses to run, there will be many of us fighting like crazy to try to ensure her nomination. Those of you who don't like her can vote for someone else. Free country.

a sure thing. Including, it seems, the OP on this thread.

Besides, she has said she's not running. It's not very nice to call a lady a liar.

No more old school politics. The world belongs to a newer generation and someone from that generation should represent them.

He could help turn Texas blue. I'm trying to think positive...hard to do sometimes.

Did you enjoy watching the Mother Of All Bombs exploding families in Iraq. You helped make it possible with your support.... BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS ENABLER...

The last thing we need is another corporate lackey and warmonger.

This is, however, how the system has been rigged and where we are headed as a result of the corporate money that now floods Washington in both political parties and in all parts of our government, media, and electoral system. Most of the Bush economic, war, police state, education, trade, and energy agenda has already been extended and expanded for the past four years. We are looking at four more, and, inevitably, many are already planning ahead for even more of the same with Clinton or a Third Way clone of Clinton in 2016.

Just imagine what our civil rights and the surveillance state will look like by then. Just imagine our corporatized schools and our spanking new pipeline, life after the new NAFTA-on-steroids free trade agreement, and after more austerity and bipartisan assaults on Social Security and Medicare. Just imagine where the drones will be by then, within our country and overseas. Imagine even more escalation of the neocon policy agenda for the next eight to twelve years. And imagine it all presented to us, again, as the lesser of two evils...the best we can possibly hope for...because the other party is even worse.

Do you feel sick yet?

Our next two corporate Presidential candidates will be selected by the Rockefeller types who can bankroll them. The one percent who have purchased and restructured our electoral system have already ensured that it will be virtually impossible for anyone without their blessing to have a serious shot at a run for President. They will destroy with their deep pockets, increasingly consolidated media (thanks to Obama's FCC, which is working on this now...), rigged and restructured electoral system, and vastly superior funding any upstart who tries to get in the way.

This is where we are headed, inevitably, if we simply keep on the path we are on and don't even try, between now and then, to rally the country to stand up and demand the corporate money out of our elections and our government. Have we had enough yet, America?

Yet that is the very thing that you are guaranteed to get.

Only the name, sex & race of the person concerned is to be debated and voted upon.

Damn good post there.