HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Social Security: The Pho...

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 07:11 PM

Social Security: The Phony Crisis

New book by Dean Baker and Mark Weisbrot

http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/035468.html

So much for the “demographic time bomb” with which the system’s “reformers” have been threatening us. With a few selected facts dressed up as surprises—such as a rising elderly population or a declining ratio of workers to retirees—and an oversized dose of verbal and accounting trickery, opponents of Social Security have been able to create the impression that the program is demographically unsustainable. This impression is false, as would be any economic projections that failed to take into account the other side of the equation, namely, the growth of the economy (see chapter 1).

Even the financial problems of Medicare do not result, for the most part, from demographic changes. While it is true that older people, on average, require more health care than the young, overall health care spending, as a percentage of gross domestic product, does not necessarily have to increase with the average age of the population. In fact, among most developed countries there appears to be no correlation between health care spending and the percentage of the population that is over 65. As a percentage of our economy, we spend twice as much on health care as does Sweden, for example, yet 17.3 percent of Sweden’s population is over 65, a proportion we will not reach for another 25 years (see chapter 3).

Rather, the financial threat to Medicare arises as this relatively more efficient system—its administrative costs are less than one-fourth those of the private system—is subjected to increasing “marketization.” The number of senior citizens who get their Medicare coverage through health maintenance organizations (HMOs) more than tripled from 1992 to 1998 and has been growing at a rate of 25 percent per year. It doesn’t take a fiscal genius at an HMO to figure out how to profit in this market. With about 90 percent of senior citizens costing Medicare an average of only $1,200 each, and with the government paying HMOs up to $6,000 per person, depending on the region, managed-care providers have been able to profit enormously by selecting, as much as possible, the healthiest senior citizens and leaving the rest (the least healthy 10 percent cost about $37,000 each) in the hands of Medicare. It all works out quite nicely for the HMOs, who can point to rising costs for Medicare relative to the more “efficient” private sector. Never mind that the HMOs’ cost reductions are achieved not only through selection of healthier patients—wasting even more resources in the selection process—but also by cutting back on necessary medical procedures. The prejudice in favor of market-based solutions is so powerful that even the groundswell of consumer dissatisfaction has yet to force policymakers to reexamine it.


6 replies, 821 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread

Response to eridani (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 07:17 PM

1. I hope no Democrat will approve of any attempt to connect SS to the Deficit. Millions

of people are now going to be watching their language when they speak about the Deficit.

They should be put on notice that we are not going to be fooled by deceptive statements that while they do not openly blame SS for contributing to the Deficit, they use both words, 'SS and the Deficit in the same sentence with the intention of having people connect them in their minds.

SS should be completely off the table in any discussions about the Deficit. No one is fooled anymore by these tactics. OWS eg has been educating people on the Big Lie which started with Right Think Tanks that 'SS is going broke etc and that it caused the deficit'.

People are not stupid, they may have been ignorant, but when talking to people during the election it was clear, a majority of those in the Dem Party are way more informed now than they ever were.

Paul Ryan made the mistake in 2005 of thinking that 'SS is no longer the third rail of politics' as he stupidly said when advising Bush to go out and talk about privatizing it. He learned how wrong he was and so did Bush who was literally sent home from what was supposed to be a 50 state campaign for the privatization of SS.

Dems should not even think of going down that road.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eridani (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 07:20 PM

2. we can not fool ourselves

SS and medicare and medicaid need overhaul....and we need to be able to discuss and not be blind to the realityu as GOp'ers are.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beachbumbob (Reply #2)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 08:15 PM

3. Cut the rightwing bullshit, please

The only overhaul Medicare needs is single payer health care for all. Social Security needs no overhaul other than elimination of the FICA cap.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eridani (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 08:20 PM

4. SS operates on a 1% overhead. How can adding a layer of profit and sky-high salaries

 

improve a great agency.

SS cannot add to the national debt and has been having the federal government borrow its assets to fund
other programs for years.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eridani (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:10 PM

5. The problem is that billionaires don't want to pay any more than a guy making $110,000...

... lift the cap and tax capital gains as well. Problem solved forever.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eridani (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:11 PM

6. The deficit is a phony crisis -- as is the "fiscal cliff"

They're all just ginned up bogeymen to give them cover to fuck us over.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread