Member since: Wed Jun 20, 2012, 02:49 AM
Number of posts: 6,887
Number of posts: 6,887
including the edit I made on my own, before you posted, or Reply 18.
And you didn't mention 2009 to 2011 at all, though the years I had mentioned were 2007 to 2011.
ETA: Thanks for the great example of the fallacy of the "If Democrats did not do it, it could not have humanly be done in the real world" theory.
Posted by merrily | Sat Jul 26, 2014, 10:42 AM (0 replies)
Nonetheless, President Obama and the D of J decided not to prosecute anyone whose ass had been covered by "legal advice," even if the advice was not so legal and not even sought until after the acts had begun. The so-called legal advice was that interrogation techniques up to and including death of the person being interrogated did not violate applicable law.
The two Attorneys most involved in the "legal advice," aside from Gonzo, were Yoo and Bybee.
Bybee had called Gonzo about getting a judgeship. Gonzo told him to come to work giving these legal opinions and then people would see about his judgeship. After giving his bullshit cya legal opinions, Bybee was nominated and confirmed for a seat on the US Circuit Court of Appeals, where he now sits for life, unless and until someone prosecutes and/or impeaches him. Guess what? Neither has happened.
Yoo went on to--wait for it--teach law. Also to write books and law review articles, both of which may well get cited in legal opinions (if they have not already been), as well as get credence from students and scholars. Bybee and Yoo are well worth your reading their full wikis and otherwise researching, along with how the Obama administration used their legal opinions to exonerate everyone who supposedly had relied on them.
As to Yoo:
In June 2004, another of Yoo's memos on interrogation techniques was leaked to the press, after which it was repudiated by Goldsmith and the OLC.
No one would even send a letter to the bar associations of Yoo and Bybee suggesting that the bar association might want to look into their actions. And by the way, the degree of evidence necessary to back up such a suggestion is zero.
Now, if legal opinions that were leaked said waterboarding, even death, of the "suspect" was legal, even massacring a village would be legal, what exactly was not previously understood about the degree of brutality of the interrogations by the CIA?
And, while I know Abu Ghraib was not about interrogations or the CIA, wasn't that a fucking clue to everyone in the world, including Congress and the Obama administration, that
Why do we continue to accept this lame, corrupt bullshit?
When are we going to demand return to the rule of law?
Posted by merrily | Sat Jul 26, 2014, 05:18 AM (1 replies)
Please see this thread in GD: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025287742
Posted by merrily | Thu Jul 24, 2014, 09:55 PM (0 replies)
As many know, the employees of Market Basket, a New England supermarket chain, are protesting the ouster of their former boss and minority stockholder, Arthur T. Demoulas, who, from all reports, was a dream boss.
The employee action was initially instigated by a man who has worked there 49 years, whose son has worked there for 25 years and whose other son has worked there "on and off." Those in control of the company fired him by delivering a message to his home and, if the business goes bankrupt, his son will be out of work, too. That is how much he believes in his boss.
A local commentator said this evening that he searched for employees to speak against Demoulas, to give both sides, but could not find any. (For consumers, Market Basket kept prices low, too.)
Many threads at DU give the background, if you don't know and are interested, but in this post, I want to focus on urgent needs.
Demoulas has made a bid for over 50% of the company. Whether or not the Board of Directors is meeting to consider that tomorrow, it is is meeting tomorrow. The employees are holding a rally in Tewksbury, Massachusetts tomorrow, July 25. They would love for anyone who can to join them.
More info about the rally is at their website.
Also at their website is a link where you can make donations to help the warehouse employees survive as they go without pay during the strikes and demonstrations. My understanding is that warehouse employees are the beneficiaries of the fund because they are among the lowest paid.
Tonight, on the news, I heard one of the lawyers for the opposition (from the firm of Burns & Levinson) say that the owners will be fine, even if the company goes bankrupt, because the real estate on which the stores sit alone is enormously valuable. I hope that is not the route they take.
Please show solidarity with the workers in whatever way you can. Maybe you can't get to Tewksbury tomorrow, but can find five or ten bucks (or more) to donate.
Since the rally is tomorrow, July 25, please try to keep this thread kicked for visibility.
Posted by merrily | Thu Jul 24, 2014, 09:36 PM (6 replies)
Many people have doubts about socialism, in part because of what I mentioned in my prior post--how much time, energy and money we've spend discrediting socialism.
Those doubts are exactly why the RW throws around the word "socialism" when social programs that have nothing to do with ownership of the means of production are at issue.
And exactly why I think the left should not also use the word incorrectly. So doing only hurts the left and helps the right.
I don't know when people began thinking that what they feels a word means is more correct than the dictionary meaning of the word. I think dictionary definitions are important if we are going to actually understand what we and others are saying, instead of only assuming we're communicating on the same page.
a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole. (in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of communism.
Posted by merrily | Thu Jul 24, 2014, 01:55 AM (1 replies)
some government program. That is its meaning and dictonary definition.
If Obamacare were truly socialist, government would be owning the hospitals, hiring doctors, nurses and maintenance staff, etc.
When the word is used loosely, it brings to bear in a program about 70 years and trillions of dollars spent by the USA combating the left and discrediting the left at home and abroad.
Posted by merrily | Thu Jul 24, 2014, 01:29 AM (1 replies)
When the DLC first formally organized, Koch Industries donated to it and one of the Koch brothers had a seat on its Executive Council.
(According to Jean Mayer of The New Yorker, this was about the same time as the Koch brothers began planning the Tea Party.)
The first two full-time employees of the DLC were Al From and Will Marshall. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Leadership_Council
Marshall later founded the Progressive Policy Institute. It's web home page used to say something like, "Welcome to the Progressive Policy Institute, the place for pragmatic progressives."
I haven't checked lately, but the last time I checked, it no longer said that. Perhaps Tom Tomorrow got to PPI?
Anyway, PPI was founded in 1989, only a few years after official formation of the DLC. In 2003, Marshall, who is still President of PPI, signed the PNAC letter, urging Bush to invade Iraq.
How's that for progressive? How's that for pragmatic?
Posted by merrily | Thu Jul 24, 2014, 01:24 AM (0 replies)
Who but plutocrats would have kept abolition of slavery out of the Constitution and restricted the vote to about 3% of the then population of the colonies, only white male who could afford to own land AND pay a poll tax?
They set up the electoral college to elect the President and Senators were elected by state legislatures--also made up of plutocrats, at least more plutocratic than others. State legislatures also got to vote on ratification of the Constitution. The people got to vote only for Reps, but the Senate got to vote on ambassadors, treaties, convictions in impeachment, etc., as well as the ability to kill things passed by the House.
We've been brainwashed all our lives to practically worship these people, most of whom were wealthy, especially the slaveowners, slaves being the single most valuable thing in the colonies. But, I'm over the brainwashing.
True, they could have overthrown the British, then set up another monarchy, if they wanted. Instead, they invented something that had never existed in human history. (They did want to make Washington "President for Life," but he refused--and that's close to another monarchy with a Congress, instead of a Parliament.)
I'll give them brilliance. Geniuses, yes, but they weren't egalitarians by any means. And they feared "the mob," which is why the Senate got more powers than the House.
Posted by merrily | Thu Jun 26, 2014, 04:40 PM (1 replies)
You can thank President Clinton...
Thank you, eizenmahn. I quoted in full because I want to add this post to my journal. I hope you don't mind. If you do, pm me and I will delete it from my journal.
And then, there was the Fairness Doctrine. Until the Obama administration, Democrats were calling for its reinstatement by the Executive Branch. However, under Obama, the FCC killed it. Whereas before, it could have been resurrected by the Executive Branch, after Obama, it will take an Act of Congress. And we all know, as we knew when the FCC put the nail in the coffin, that it will never pass Congress.
And much more recently, the FCC blew it with the internet, too.
But, sure, let's make believe that only Republicans are to blame for all our ills. That's great for professional Democrats, not so much for ordinary Democratic voters.
Posted by merrily | Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:09 PM (0 replies)
what kind of activism?
Demonstrations, marches, signing internet petitions, calling your Rep? Don't get me wrong, I do do some of that, even though, as I am doing it, I ask myself why am I doing this when I don't think it will matter. The answer is, because I can't help myself. But, I don't think that will do the job.
Some of the things that have occurred to me:
Two huge websites, one for the US, one for the world. Not to discuss anything but what is going on in activism at the moment and maybe to exchange ideas on the most effective kinds of activism.
Demonstrations, but really big ones. It could be local for everyone. "Show up at your town halls with signs next week at lunch hour," for example.
Ten people show up at a town hall, pffft. Five or ten people show up at every town hall in the country, though--maybe something gets shaken up? Maybe by the tenth week or so, media will even admit it's happening?
Iching and True Delphi are good evangelists for acting local and I really want to do more of that, too.
Anyway, those are some things I Have been mulling.
And so on.
Posted by merrily | Tue Jun 24, 2014, 09:24 PM (1 replies)