HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Alan Grayson » Journal
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU
Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 24 Next »

Alan Grayson

Profile Information

Member since: Sat May 22, 2010, 01:02 PM
Number of posts: 400

Journal Archives

Help the Reform Super PAC to End All Super PACs

From time to time, I turn these notes over to someone else who has something to say that you need to hear. Today, on Independence Day, it’s Prof. Lawrence Lessig. Lessig has lauched MayDay PAC, the Super PAC to end all Super PACs. MayDay is a fund to help ordinary people join together, and demand clean elections and good government. Let’s declare our independence from sewer money in politics. I’ll let Lessig explain further:


Rep. Alan Grayson

Dear Friend:

This is Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Lessig.

Since the early 1920s, aviators and mariners have used the word MAYDAY to signal distress.

On the sea, when another captain hears that call, there is an obligation to lend aid.
At MayDay PAC, we are calling a MAYDAY on this democracy. Americans from across the political spectrum believe our government is broken. More than 90% of us link that failure to the role of money in politics.

And yet our politicians do nothing to break that link. Instead they spend endless time raising campaign funds from the tiniest fraction of the 1%.

Our democracy is held hostage by these funders of campaigns. We have announced a plan to get it back.

Can you watch this video explaining our MayDay PAC and chip in $10 or more to help take our democracy back?

Several years ago, I decided to give up my work on copyright and Internet policy, and take up the fight against corruption.

I started collaborating with others on the best way to build a grassroots movement around campaign finance reform. Washington won't fix itself -- The People need to take action.

That's why we created MayDay PAC, an ambitious "Super PAC to end all Super PACs" that will make reform a 2014 campaign issue. We've raised millions so far, shocking the political world.

Watch this video explaining MayDay PAC and chip in $10 or more if you want to be part of this movement.

With hope,

Lawrence Lessig
Posted by Alan Grayson | Fri Jul 4, 2014, 07:26 PM (4 replies)

Frank Underwood, von Clausewitz, Rumsfeld and Yogi Berra

I need to get something off my chest. This past week, to absolutely no fanfare whatever, the last declared chemical weapons left Syria. (Isn’t it interesting how the drums of war earn endless media coverage, but the dove of peace flies unnoticed?) I say the “last declared weapons” because those are the only ones that we know about, but any evidence of undeclared chemical weapons in Syria is even harder to find than any evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. So as far as anybody can tell, all of the Syrian chemical weapons are gone.

And this was accomplished without U.S. military intervention in Syria.

I was very outspoken about my opposition to military intervention in Syria – outspoken in seven national TV interviews in a single day, and over 40 media interviews in four days. I said that Congress would not authorize war against Syria, because the Administration’s military plans were costly and dangerous, they would not achieve any strategic purpose, and they would not and could not eliminate those chemical weapons. And I was right. If the Administration’s war plans had come to a vote in the House, they would have been defeated by a margin of roughly 10 to 1. Because the American public spoke up – people like you spoke up.

I understand that there are some who think that the threat of Congress authorizing military action is what drove Assad to relinquish chemical weapons. I’ve always been skeptical of that argument, since there were five different public counts (including one at the Washington Post) all showing that House opponents of military intervention outnumbered supporters by 10 to 1. Anyone with internet access could find that out, and I assume that Assad has internet access. Did Assad relinquish those weapons because his command-and-control structure had broken down, and he could no longer control when and where those weapons were used? Or because he was afraid that they might fall into rebel hands, because so much of his weaponry already had?

In the words of two great (albeit fictitious) military strategists, Francis Urquhart and Frank Underwood, “You might very well think that, but I couldn’t possibly comment.”

Now think about this: What if we had gone to war against Syria last year? We would have:

(a) hit the Syrian regime hard, and

(b) delivered the Syrian chemical weapons into the hands of ISIS.

Yes, ISIS, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. The ones whom the Administration is helping the Iraqi Government to fight. Those are ones who crucify and behead their enemies. Picture what they could do with poison gas.

So my enemy’s enemy is my friend. Unless it’s my enemy. And what about my enemy’s enemy who also is my friend’s enemy, even though my friend is allied with my enemy?

As far as I can recall, I’m the only one who pointed out last year that just because you’re hurting the bad guy (Assad) doesn’t necessarily mean that you’re helping the good guys, or whoever passes for that in Syria these days. I remember one national TV interview in which the interviewer asked me whether we should be helping the Syrian rebels. I answered, “Which ones: the Al Qaida graduates, or the anti-Semites?”

The German military strategist Carl von Clausewitz understood this problem well. He referred to it as “the fog of war.” Here is a translation of what he said:

“War is an area of uncertainty; three-quarters of the things on which all action in war is based are lying in a fog of uncertainty, to a greater or lesser extent. The first thing needed here is a fine, piercing mind, to feel out the truth, with the measure of its judgment.”

Or to put it as Secretary Donald Rumsfeld did, ironically in the context of explaining why we never found any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq:

“There are known knowns; there are things that we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns, the ones we don’t know we don’t know.”

President George W. Bush wasn’t exactly a “fine, piercing mind,” and so in the search of those nonexistent weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, we flushed roughly 4,000 American lives, 400,000+ Iraqi lives and $4,000,000,000,000.00 down the you-know-what. After that lesson, I was hoping last year to see some “fine, piercing mind” emerge from within the Administration during the debate of U.S. military intervention in Syria. But I was disappointed. It was more along the lines of “let’s just toss in some missiles, and see what happens.”

One of the greatest unknowns in war is in knowing – or really, not knowing – what effect your own actions will have. On that subject, we must turn to yet another great military strategist, Yankees Manager Yogi Berra:

“It’s hard to make predictions, especially about the future.”

And that, Ladies and Gentlemen, is a lesson that our leaders need to take to heart. To which I offer this sequela:

When in doubt, PEACE.


Rep. Alan Grayson
Posted by Alan Grayson | Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:09 AM (3 replies)

The Right Wing Attacks Me Relentlessly – Out of Fear

The Urban Dictionary defines the term “Obama Derangement Syndrome” as follows:

“The acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the statements -- nay -- the very existence of Barack Obama.”

Whenever the term “Obama Derangement Syndrome” enters the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , I suggest a subheading for an equally debilitating disease: “Grayson Derangement Syndrome.” There seems to be a massive and uncontrollable outbreak of that ailment on the starboard side of the American political spectrum every time that my name enters political discourse.

Alan Grayson – he drives the Right Wing crazy. Doesn’t he deserve your support for that alone? Then show your support, by clicking here.

Take last month, for instance. It fell to Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi to choose five House Democrats, from among 199, to serve on the House Kangaroo Court – sorry, the House Select Committee – on Benghazi. Five out of 199: not very good odds. Nevertheless, 70,000 grassroots, rank-and-file Democrats signed a petition to have me appointed to the House Star Chamber – sorry, the House Select Committee – on Benghazi. Here are some of the reasons that were mentioned:

- I do this sort of thing quite well. The most watched Congressional video in history (over five million views) is my committee examination of Elizabeth Coleman, the Inspector General of the Federal Reserve. I ask the witnesses actual questions, I require actual answers, and the public actually learns stuff.

- I serve, with distinction, on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, the committee that has jurisdiction of diplomats and foreign embassy safety.

- Unlike every other Member of the House, at least as far as I can tell, I took the time and trouble to read all of the classified Benghazi e-mails and cables and memos and reports, spending many hours at a lonely classified location that I cannot disclose.

- I was a practicing lawyer for a quarter of a century, so I know a thing or two about what to do with a witness.

- I already questioned Secretary Clinton and a U.S. Ambassador on what happened in Benghazi. By everyone’s reckoning, I spent the time well. Thus I already have helped to dispel the flagrant nonsense surrounding what I called “the scandal that never was.”

So it should come as no surprise that I would be part of the conversation about who should serve on the House Benghazi Inquisition – sorry, House Benghazi Committee.

Unless, of course, you are part of what Hillary Clinton aptly called the “Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy.” Their reaction was not one of surprise. It was fear. Because they know that I can stand up to them.

Who is the one Democrat whom you know that you can count on to fight back against Right Wing psychosis? Alan Grayson, that’ s who. That’s why they fear him, and that’s why we need to support him.

So as soon as my name was floated as a committee member, not by some talking head on TV but rather by 70,000 good Democrats, the attacks began, starting with – who else? – Fox News.

On the May 20th chapter of “Fox and Friends” (“Friends” of Fox News? Yuck.), Fox conceded that Democrats were “impressed” with me because I’m a “great prosecutor” and “so direct in my questioning.”

And then Fox took out the knives. The omniscient “crawl” at the bottom of the screen screamed out that I’m “known” for my “inflammatory comments.” (Unlike Fox News itself, I suppose.) The highly objective and profoundly unbiased Fox chyron then added that my possible nomination to the committee was an “OUTRAGE” and a “DISSERVICE” (all capital letters, for the hard-of-seeing).

In case the already-bludgeoned Fox viewer had somehow missed the point, Disinformation Officer Elisabeth Hasselbeck said that I’d be “a spoke in the wheel” for the committee. She wondered whether, if my “target were Republicans, would that be a good idea?” (When you know as little as Hasselbeck knows, you do a lot of wondering.)

Steve Doofy – sorry, Doocy – claimed that the petition that 70,000 of us signed “started out as a joke, on Twitter and the blogs.” (Believe me, when it comes to Steve Doocy and jokes, it takes one to know one.) Steve Goofy – sorry, Doocy – then charged that my being on the Benghazi Committee would “gum up the works” and “turn the Committee into a kangaroo court” -- “They think it’s a farce.” At which point, the irony meter exploded. Yet the Fox chyron heartily agreed with Boozy – sorry, Doocy – charging sternly that my nomination would represent the “Democrats Pulling A Political Stunt.”

And here was the most damning condemnation against me from the all-wise and all-knowing Steve Woozy – sorry, Doocy – that Einstein of the airwaves: “Republicans do not think that he is a great statesman.”

(True fact about Steve Doocy: this year, he was named “Kansan of the Year.” How very, very sorry for Kansas.)

Alan Grayson said that if he were named to the Benghazi Committee, he would be the GOP’s “worst and last nightmare.” Judging from the response of Fox News, that’s exactly how they saw it, too. Alan Grayson has the strength and courage to stand up to the Right-Wing Noise Machine. That’s why he deserves your support today, before the FEC deadline on June 30 at midnight.

As Media Matters aptly noted, the Fox “News” attack on me what Fox’s attempt “to dictate the terms of Democratic cooperation” with the House Benghazi Burlesque – sorry, House Benghazi Committee. Media Matters said that Fox News wanted to keep a tight grip on the committee, and it sure couldn’t do that if I were appointed.

Moreover, Fox News wasn’t the only right-wing propaganda organ recognizing that threat to the narrative. When MSNBC reported on the petition to place me on the committee, an online Fox News wannabe called The American Journal responded by calling me an “unhinged lunatic.” (I think that all lunatics should have hinges, don’t you?) For good measure, this dispassionate chronicle added that I was “slightly to the left of Marx and on the same mental plane as Stalin.” And during the previous month, this detached and sober diary of the American experience named me “the Most Outrageously Insane Politician Ever Elected.” (By the way, The American Journal was absolutely delighted with the actual Democratic appointees to the committee, and praised them to the skies.)

Let me put this simply: I stand up to these right-wing bullies. I skewer their calls to hatred and fear with facts and logic. I am unfazed and undazed. I am unbowed and uncowed. Which is why they know that they must ATTACK-ATTACK-ATTACK. They are on a search and destroy mission against the truth, and I am their #1 target.

The Koch Brothers have been running attack ads against Rep. Alan Grayson in his district since last November. We can’t afford to lose him. Our deadline is midnight tomorrow. Show your support right now – every dollar counts.

Perhaps in some parallel universe, parallel Alan Grayson sees these parallel vicious, personal and relentless attacks, and says, “what the hell – I don’t need this grief. I give up.” But in this universe, I recognize their desperate lies as . . . desperate lies.

Mahatma Gandhi once said, “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” We are now at Stage Three. And, with your help , we will move on, to Stage Four. Then we win.


Rep. Alan Grayson

Maybe If I Voted Naked ...

In the Nicomachean Ethics , the Greek philosopher Aristotle suggested that virtue is its own reward. I’m hoping that that’s true, because I’m not seeing any other reward lately. For sure, the media couldn’t care less about all of the good things that we do.

Let me give you a few examples, and then explain why this means that I need your help .

Example No. 1. Last October and November, I convened impromptu hearings in Capitol Hill regarding the innocent victims of drone warfare in Pakistan and Yemen. Hundreds of children had been killed, among others. I pointed out at those hearings that if the Government of Pakistan wanted to stop the drone attacks, it could do so overnight. That statement was front-page news in Pakistan. And lo and behold, the drone attacks stopped for six months, as did the murder of the innocents. How do I know that our action made the attacks stop? Because someone very high up and very close to the situation told me so. (If I told you who it was, they’d have to kill you – and probably send a drone to do it.) The cessation of drone attacks was barely reported in the United States. As far as I could tell, not a single article linked what we did to that result. (Fox News did take the opportunity, however, to slam me for cavorting with terrorists, or some nonsense like that.) News media coverage: zero – except for some idiotic local reporter who repeated the Fox lie verbatim.

Example No. 2. For several years, the CIA has had a policy against using journalists as spies, because this leads to the assumption that all journalists are spies. This prevents them from performing their journalism thing, and puts them in great danger. Earlier this year, I wrote to the CIA, and suggested the same principle should apply to health professionals. Doctors and nurses whom we were sending to disease-ridden backwaters were unable to perform their function because they were misperceived as spies. That meant that fatal diseases were not being treated, vaccinations were not being given, and our billion-dollar efforts to eradicate TB and malaria were failing. A few weeks ago, “Intelligence” released a statement that health professional would not be used in spying. As far as I could tell, not a single article linked what we did to that outcome. News media coverage: zero.

Example No. 3. Last year, it came to my attention that a political prisoner was being held in Benin on the hokey pretext that he had tried to poison the President of Benin. The charges were so absurd that a judge ordered them dismissed – and then the judge was arrested, while the prisoner remained in prison. I had a diplomatic and cordial discussion about this with the Beninese Ambassador, after which I provided him with a deadline. After that deadline passed without action, I introduced a bill to cut off all U.S. aid to Benin. At which point this political prisoner was released. As far as I could tell, not a single article linked what we did to the release. News media coverage: zero.
And don’t even get me started on the subject of my outspoken opposition to U.S. military intervention in Syria. The final reported chemical weapons in Syria were destroyed last week. News media coverage: close to zero.

I pass more amendments that any other Member of the House. Local media coverage: zero.
I write more bills and resolutions than any other Member of Congress. Local media coverage: zero.
I’m the only Member of the House to raise most of his campaign funds from small donors. Local media coverage: zero.
But there were over 100 local “news” reports on certain divorce proceedings.

Maybe if I voted naked . . . .

Essentially, the only thing that our voters in Central Florida hear about my work in Congress is whatever lies gibberish and drivel that the Koch Brothers vomit up onto our local TV screens.

And the only way for us to change that is for us to hire the canvassers, buy the internet ads, send the mailers and run those TV and radio spots. Which is why I need your help.

For all practical purposes, the so-called “mainstream media” has forged an alliance with the Far Right to treat America like a giant mushroom farm: keep us in the dark, and spread fertilizer all over us. The “mainstream media” deploys its weapons of mass distraction (Kim Kardashian! College Football!), while the Far Right inundates us with propaganda.

We have to break through that Iron Curtain of Malignant Stupidity. And your contribution powers our breakthrough.

The clock is ticking down to the end of the quarter. Our Federal Election Commission cutoff time is Monday night at midnight. Would you please give our campaign the resources we need to inform our voters?

Every dollar counts, because every human being counts. I’m counting on you. So stand up, and be counted.


Rep. Alan Grayson

“A prophet is honored everywhere, except in his own land.”

-- Matthew 13:57.

"Congressman With Guts": What Does That Mean?

Alan Grayson’s pal, David Keith here. If I knew anything about modern culture, I would make an oblique reference to “Superman’s Pal, Jimmy Olsen,” a popular comic book that was published from 1954 to 1974. But that was way before I was born, so I know nothing about that.

Here at Casa Grayson, we sometimes are asked why the name of our website is www.CongressmanWithGuts.com. Once when Alan was on Rachel Maddow’s MSNBC show, Rachel noted that there wasn’t much demand for that URL before Alan came along. So it was readily available.

Do you want a Congressman With Guts in the U.S. House of Representatives? Then please click here, and show your support for Alan’s re-election campaign.

OK, so we didn’t have to use the term “guts.” We could have said bravery, courageousness, pluck, boldness, daring, fearlessness, audacity, intrepidity, heroism, lionheartedness, dauntlessness, spirit, resolution, determination, feistiness or spunk. But “guts” is so . . . short. And “CongressmanWithSpunk.com” definitely doesn’t sound right.

CongressmanWithPluck.com, on the other hand . . . .

Anyway, I want to prove to you, by example, that my boss deserves the title of “Congressman With Guts,” and that you should contribute to his campaign in the next 72 hours. If not sooner.

You may know the story of the last three Grayson elections:

2008: won narrowly, becoming the first Democrat to represent downtown Orlando since Watergate.

2010: lost badly, after being hammered by more “independent expenditure” sewer money than any House candidate in the country, anywhere, ever.

2012: won solidly, in the greatest comeback in House history – and the Koch Brothers started to run attack ads against him shortly thereafter.

We can’t let 2014 be like 2010. Contribute to Alan Grayson’s campaign before our June 30 deadline, and make sure that he continues to represent us in the House.

So let me tell you about something gutsy.

Of the $5.5 million in sewer money spent on vicious attack ads against Alan in 2010, providing Alan with a two-year unpaid vacation, $4 million of that was spent by the Koch Brothers.

You might think that after that trauma, when Alan ran for Congress again in 2012, he might have kept his head down, and gone out of his way not to bring himself to the attention of them Koch guys.

If you thought that, you would be wrong.

In 2012, Alan went on national TV, and condemned the Koch Brothers by name for their “outright lies” and their “trickery.” A Huffington Post report on that interview drew over 2000 comments.

In 2013, when the Koch Brothers held a sewer money summit in Alan’s hometown of Orlando, he organized a street protest against them.

And earlier this year, when Alan learned that the Koch Brothers own much of the Texas refinery capacity at the termination of the Keystone XL pipeline, standing to make billions in profits if the pipeline is completed, he spread that essential information far and wide.

Alan Grayson: He Doesn’t. Back. Down.

And that’s why we need Alan Grayson to remain in Congress, despite the Koch Brothers attack ads running against Alan in his district since last November. That’s why Alan needs your support – and deserves it.

So when we say that Alan Grayson is a Congressman With Guts, we’re not talking about his viscera, his entrails, his bowels or his innards. We’re not talking about his chitlins.

We’re talking about his moxie, his cheek, his cojones, his grit and his chutzpah.

But sometimes, you pay a price for that. Here is another random cultural reference that I couldn’t possibly know:

Lou Grant: “You’ve got spunk. I hate spunk.”
- The Mary Tyler Moore Show (1970).

I’m going to go out on a limb, and say that the Koch Brothers hate Alan Grayson’s spunk. <strong>And that is what makes it so important that you contribute to our campaign today, before the June 30 FEC deadline.</strong>

That, plus the fact that I’m paid in arrears, and I deeply desire to see a paycheck on July 1 for my outstanding work during the month of June.

It’s time for you to chip in.


Alan Grayson’s pal David Keith

Turk Jackson : You got rocks , ain't ya?
Jimmy Olsen : Yes, sir, especially in my head.

- Adventures of Superman: Through the Time Barrier (1955).

Winning: Even Harder Than It Looks

So the GOP had us vote in the U.S. House of Representatives today on yet another malevolent bill, whose primary purpose evidently is to reduce Planet Earth to a burnt cinder. If the GOP were right that humans weren’t causing climate disruption, that might prove to be something of a relief, because then we wouldn’t feel so stupid about the extinction of humanity. The title of the GOP’s bill was “Lowering Gasoline Prices to Fuel an America That Works Act,” also known as the LGPTFAATW Act. Paging Dr. Orwell, paging Dr. Orwell . . . .

Five House Democrats stepped forward with amendments, seeking to make this putrid saddlebag of puss slightly less detestable. There are 233 Republicans in the House, and 199 Democrats. Here is how the Democrats voted:

(1) 178 to 8.
(2) 179 to 5.
(3) 183 to 3.
(4) 174 to 12.
(5) 185 to 2.

So the Democratic amendments drew the support of between 94% and 99% of all the Democrats. Sounds promising, right? No, not right. Here is how the Republicans voted on the same amendments:

(1) 1 to 224.
(2) 4 to 222.
(3) 5 to 220.
(4) 5 to 217.
(5) 4 to 221.

Not a single Democratic amendment drew more than 2% of the Republican votes.

Ladies and Gentlemen, Welcome to the 113th Congress!

For a Democrat to win on any vote, that Democrat needs the support of all the Democrats, and at least 8% of the Republicans. Or somewhat fewer Democrats (I’m looking at you, Jim Matheson!), and even more of the Republicans.

That didn’t happen today. Not even close.

But hey, I’m a Democrat, and somehow or other, I won on 13 House amendment votes last year -- more than any other Member, Democratic or Republican. Plus 15 times this year – so far. And I won on good progressive stuff, too – protecting us from NSA sabotage of security standards, moving money from weapons to biomedical research, cutting off funding for contractors whose work is late or over budget, etc., etc.
Q. Who deserves your support? A. A proud progressive Democrat who knows how to win! Please contribute to our re-election campaign before the June 30 FEC deadline.

So why have my amendments succeeded, when so many other Democratic amendments have failed? Here are a few reasons:

(1) I give some thought as to what might make a progressive amendment appealing to 18 or more House Republicans. Sometimes I can make a regional pitch, as I did to coastal Republicans on an offshore drilling amendment. Sometimes I can make a Constitutional pitch, as I did on a shield law for reporters and their sources. Sometimes I can make a nationalist pitch, as I did for protecting the Buy American Act from being gutted in trade negotiations. And sometimes I can make a political pitch, as I did for increased funding for Spanish-language housing counseling. (“Do you really want Hispanics to hate the GOP forever and ever?”) With some thought, I can see each proposal the way that the other side sees it, and I can come up with a way to win enough of their votes without compromising our principles.

(2) I come up with things that are worth voting on. I’m not going to waste everyone’s time with an amendment to establish a commission, or order a report. That’s not my style. I swing for the fences. And in an institution scared by pervasive, perpetual boredom, that counts for something. I keep it real, and I keep it interesting.

(3) I’m not afraid to talk to GOP leadership directly. I walk right up to them, I tell them what I want, and I explain why I want it. I don’t mince words. I don’t try to fool them. I don’t kiss up to them. Usually, they say no, but every once in a while, they say yes. And they love being asked.

(4) I work it. I work it like no one else in the House. (Sorry, but it ain’t bragging if it’s true.) For every amendment that I care about, I personally write a letter to every other Member of the House, explaining why I deserve their support. I hand the letter to most of them myself. I talk to dozens and dozens of GOP members about what my amendment is all about. My staff talks to their staff. And I enlist the help of other Members to spread the word.
Isn’t this EXACTLY what you want from a Member of Congress? Someone who pays attention, works hard, cares about our principles, and figures out HOW TO WIN? As MSNBC’s Ed Schultz once said about Rep. Alan Grayson, “This guy is what it’s all about!” So show your support for our Congressman With Guts right now, before the looming June 30 deadline.

You may ask, why don’t other House Democrats do this, instead of sitting around and whining about how awful the GOP is? It’s like the old joke:

Q. Why is there so much ignorance and apathy? A. I don’t know and I don’t care.

I tell other Members that if they’re unhappy with their job, then they should let someone else have it. No matter which side has the numbers, there are 50 different ways to win.

And it’s so important to win. There are 700,000 people in Central Florida, and 320 million people nationwide, who are counting on me to do something good for them. And that’s good enough for me.


Rep. Alan Grayson

P.S. As we said yesterday, with the June 30 deadline approaching, you’ll be seeing a lot of messages this week from Members of Congress, asking for your support. But ours notes are the only ones that you’ll see citing actual accomplishments. Think about that, and then show your support for America’s Congressman.

What I Did This Spring, By Alan M. Grayson

When I was a boy, back in prehistoric times (as my children would say), our first assignment upon returning to school after each summer was to write an essay entitled “What I Did This Summer.” Well I feel that you, Dear Reader, you are entitled to a similar report. What have we been up to, here at Fort Grayson, for the past several months? Allow me to explain . . . .

Last year, we passed more amendments on the Floor of the House than any other Member of Congress, Democratic or Republican. Which is not easy thing to do, when you lose every single vote that goes along party lines. We passed thirteen amendments, enacting good, solid, progressive legislation.

This year, so far: FIFTEEN. We have shattered our own record, even before we reach the midpoint of The Year Two Thousand Fourteen.

<em>IS THIS THE KIND OF PROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP THAT YOU WANT TO SEE? If yes, then click here to support our reelection campaign. If no, then go waste your time watching Fox News .

And once again, we have passed all of these amendments without renaming a single post office, establishing any commission, or mandating some report. Nope, we’ve done some real heavy lifting in the past few months. Here are some examples:

(1) In a stunning surprise vote at 12:40 am that pieced together 175 Democrats and 53 Republicans, we enacted a shield law to protect journalists and their sources.
(2) We expanded our “corporate death penalty” for government contractors who commit serious crimes.
(3) We moved $20 million more from the military budget to the medical research budget.
(4) We once again boosted funding for bilingual housing counseling by 50%.
(5) We prohibited the Trade Representative from weakening Buy American Act laws, showing that Congress will protect our interests against “trade” giveaways to multinational corporations.
(6) We prevented the National Security Agency from weakening cryptographic standards.
AND WE DEMONSTRATED THAT A PROGRESSIVE CAN GET THINGS DONE. Which is why our campaign deserves your support, as our June 30 deadline approaches.

I could have spent the last three months schmoozing with corporate lobbyists. I could have spent the last three months begging rich people for campaign funds. I could have spent the last three months on “Congressional delegation” junkets. I could have spent the last three months selling off little chunks of the law to the highest bidder, just like the Republicans do.

But you deserve better than that. You deserve a Representative who can fight for progressive values, and win.

So as the clock winds down on Q2, as the Spring Semester comes to an end, ask yourself this: Who has EARNED your support? Who DESERVES your support? Who really REPRESENTS YOU in Congress?

You know the answer. So click here, and show your support. The show must go on, and with your help, it will.


Rep. Alan Grayson

P.S. You’re going to be seeing a lot of messages from Members of Congress this week, asking for your support. I’m fairly confident, though, that this is the only one that you’ll see based on actual accomplishments. Think about that, and then click on that button below.

EMERGENCY -- Another Iraq War Vote Coming!

My colleague, Congresswoman Barbara Lee, will offer two amendments on the defense spending bill today or tomorrow. Both of these amendments will prevent funding for war in Iraq. I need you to sign this emergency petition supporting Congresswoman Lee's amendments.

Although Rep. Lee was the only member to vote against the Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) in 2001, she won't be alone this time. I will also stand up to say “No!” The more names we add to the petition, the more members of Congress will come out in opposition, too.


We need to say NO. American combat forces didn't help last time and they won't help this time. What is happening in Iraq is tragic and awful, but we should use the Hippocratic oath for foreign policy -- first do no harm. Please join us.


Here are the gory details of the amendments. The first eliminates funding for the Authorization of the Use of Military Force in Iraq, which is basically our declaration of war made in 2002. The second eliminates funding for 'combat troops' in Iraq.

Join us.


Maybe Congress will get it right this time, after getting it so, so wrong last time. At the very least, since I'm in Congress this time, you can count on me to support peace. We also have a President not named Bush, and he actually listens to reason.

But tens of thousands of you pushing is essential!


This is an emergency. Send this to your friends. Send this to your family. Post this on Facebook, on Twitter, on whatever newfangled services are out there.

If you know any reporters or bloggers, send this to them. Yes, this is real breaking news.

We may win the vote, or we may not. But if we don't advocate peace, we won't get peace. So let's do this. Together.



Alan Grayson

P.S. Please share this on Facebook and Twitter.

The FCC Wants Your Opinion: Should the Government Kill Free Speech on the Internet?

A lot of people think the internet is a free and open environment, where you can say what you want and visit, build, and use the sites and services you want. And it is. But that's only because the government protects us from the large cable and phone companies. These companies want to block, slow, or degrade services and sites that don't pay them money. This means that, absent government protection, any site or service might be slowed down and made unusable, if the owner won't or can't pay off the corporate bullies.

When President Obama ran for office, he promised to protect the internet from these kinds of predatory practices. But his Federal Communications Commission, chaired by an ex-cable lobbyist named Tom Wheeler, may allow an internet which discriminates against web sites and services.

That's the bad news.

Now here's the good news.

Chairman Wheeler also says that he wants YOUR feedback before making this pivotal decision. I've set up a site where you can submit your comments to the FCC.


I've been in touch with the FCC over the past few months. In a letter to me, Chairman Wheeler acknowledged that the FCC has the legal authority to protect free speech on the internet. It's just about whether he wants to do so. So let's tell him to do exactly that.


We're in this together. Let's ask the FCC to do what the President said it would. Let's ask the FCC to do its job.

Let's ask them to protect free speech, freedom, and America. A better world is possible, and we can make that world happen.


Alan Grayson

P.S. Please share this on Facebook and Twitter, while you still can.

How We’re Beating the Big Corporate Trade Agenda

Winning. It's not a word you hear often among progressives. But our campaign against giant corporate-friendly trade agreements is working.

Right now, the United States Trade Representative is negotiating two giant trade corporate agreements that would create free trade areas with East Asia and much of Europe.

Two weeks ago, I passed an amendment in the U.S. House of Representatives mandating saying that no matter what happens with these agreements, local, state, and the Federal government are allowed to buy American-made products. This is common sense. The American government should be able to buy American products. Even the corporate GOP were afraid to vote against this amendment.

Now it's up to the Senate to pass this amendment as well. Senator Ron Wyden recently became Chairman of the Finance Committee in the Senate, which is the committee that handles questions of trade, including these giant trade agreements.

Please sign my petition asking Senator Wyden to turn my Buy America provision into law.

I'll deliver your names to his office, so he can see how much support there is for a smarter way to do trade.

Sign now.

If a Tea Party dominated House of Representatives can take on corporate interests and pass this, then surely Democrats in the Senate can.

Let's make it happen. Forward this email to your friends. Let them know that we the people can win. Let them know that we the people are winning. Together.


Alan Grayson

P.S. Here's a story about my amendment.
Go to Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 24 Next »