Member since: Wed Feb 10, 2010, 01:12 PM
Number of posts: 4,633
Number of posts: 4,633
- 2016 (45)
- 2015 (120)
- 2014 (217)
- 2013 (276)
- 2012 (107)
- Older Archives
FULL REPORT: http://www.oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-04-07-00260.pdf
Commentary behind paywall:
Downloaded From: http://neuro.polrc.silverchair.com/ by a Google Scholar User on 02/22/2016
Posted by proverbialwisdom | Wed Apr 6, 2016, 03:10 PM (0 replies)
ANYONE* who questions ANYTHING** is deserving of your inane epithet? Oh, really? Look around.
(including American Academy of Pediatrics March 2016 journal authors)*
(timing for example)**
Just my observation, but there is geographic overlap between the authors of the paper above and the medical center which published on their official website the stat that 1:20 children under 5 have epilepsy (link below). Think about it.
"About 5% of children younger than 5 years old have epilepsy. That is about one in every 20 children under 5."
The US infant mortality rate is 56th in the developed world in 2014.
Not a thing to do with infectious disease, so not concerned? Disgraceful.
Posted by proverbialwisdom | Tue Apr 5, 2016, 09:57 PM (1 replies)
Posted by proverbialwisdom | Mon Apr 4, 2016, 11:51 AM (0 replies)
6 More Ways to Help During Autism ACTION Month
By Cathy Jameson
I appreciate it when people recognize how much work it takes for me to care for son. Ronan is 13 years old and has non-verbal regressive autism. He needs 24/7 care. From diapering to redirecting to reducing behaviors to managing his medical issues, including seizures, it’s more than a full-time job for me. Some friends see that but they don’t always know how to pitch in. That’s okay. Some days it’s daunting even for me to think about everything that needs to be done let alone plan and implement and hope that everything goes smoothly! There’s more than enough to do to keep Ronan happy, healthy, and safe though, so when someone expresses that they want to help my family, I humbly and gladly take it.
When I’m asked, “Cathy, what can I do to help your family?” I share a few ideas from this list. Posted two years ago, there are tons of ideas to choose: 30 Days of Autism Action Ideas. Even though there are plenty of ideas on that list, I thought I’d expand on a few of them this year:
1 – I think that many parents appreciate being able to take a break every now and then, but parents of a child with autism may not be able to. If their child wanders or elopes, that parent cannot take their eyes off their child. If their child is non-verbal or non-communicative, the parent may not want to leave their child in the care of someone else, especially if it’s a new person. If a parent is able to take a break, it may be because the person they’ve entrusted their child to is a reliable family, friend, or a hired caregiver. If you’d like to offer to be that family’s reliable help, learn what needs to be done and offer to be that person. Even if it’s coming over a few minutes at a time, learn the routine. Learn the stims. Learn the triggers. Learn the signs if the child uses sign language or become familiar with the communication device if they use that. Learn how to help, and do just that. If it’s too much to handle, because some of the care the child requires just might be, don’t give up on helping. Find another way to be there for the family.
Continue reading "6 More Ways to Help During Autism ACTION Month" »
Posted by proverbialwisdom | Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:24 PM (0 replies)
The Obamas host their last White House Easter Egg Roll
1 hour ago
It's a 138-year-old tradition to invite the nation's children to the White House lawn for an Easter celebration. Celebrities like Christian Bale, Beyoncé and Shaq attended this year.
Posted by proverbialwisdom | Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:51 PM (14 replies)
March 2016, VOLUME 137 / ISSUE 3
From the American Academy of Pediatrics
Recommended Childhood and Adolescent Immunization Schedule—United States, 2016
COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES
March 2016, VOLUME 137 / ISSUE 3
Childhood Vaccine Exemption Policy: The Case for a Less Restrictive Alternative
Douglas J. Opel, Matthew P. Kronman, Douglas S. Diekema, Edgar K. Marcuse, Jeffrey S. Duchin, Eric Kodish
Abbreviations: MV — measles vaccine, NME — nonmedical exemption, VPD — vaccine-preventable disease
Efforts to restrict parents’ ability to exempt children from receiving vaccinations required for school entry have recently reached a pinnacle. The American Medical Association voiced support for eliminating nonmedical exemptions (NMEs) from school vaccine requirements,1 and California enacted legislation doing so.2 Although laudable in their objective, policies eliminating NMEs from all vaccines are scientifically and ethically problematic. In the present article, we argue for an exemption policy that eliminates NMEs just for the measles vaccine (MV) and is pursued only after other less restrictive approaches have been implemented and deemed unsuccessful.
Published By American Academy of Pediatrics
Print ISSN 0031-4005
Online ISSN 1098-4275
Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
Author Information: Douglas J. Opel, MD, MPHa,b, Matthew P. Kronman, MD, MSCEb, Douglas S. Diekema, MD, MPHa,b,c, Edgar K. Marcuse, MD, MPHb, Jeffrey S. Duchin, MDd,e,f, and Eric Kodish, MDg
aTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, and
Dr Opel conceptualized and designed the study and drafted the initial manuscript; and Drs Kronman, Diekema, Marcuse, Duchin, and Kodish reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Posted by proverbialwisdom | Thu Mar 24, 2016, 02:09 PM (0 replies)
CASE: Bruesewitz v. Wyeth
All hail bad memes, NOT.
Posted by proverbialwisdom | Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:12 PM (0 replies)
March 9, 2016 | By Andrew Crocker
Worried about Apple? California Has a Bill That Would Disable Encryption on All Phones
Smartphone users in California take notice: a new CA State Assembly bill would ban default encryption features on all smartphones. Assembly Bill 1681, introduced in January by Assemblymember Jim Cooper (D), would require any smartphone sold in California “to be capable of being decrypted and unlocked by its manufacturer or its operating system provider.” This is perhaps even more drastic than the legal precedent at stake in Apple’s ongoing showdown with the Justice Department, in which the government is trying to force a private company to write code undermining key security features in specific cases.
Both Apple and Google currently encrypt smartphones running their iOS and Android operating systems by default. A.B. 1681 would undo this default, penalizing manufacturers and providers of operating systems $2,500 per device that cannot be decrypted at the time of sale.
Similar proposals have been made by Manhattan district attorney Cyrus Vance Jr., who published a white paper in November 2015 arguing that law enforcement needs to access the contents of smartphones to solve a range of crimes. A nearly identical bill is also pending in the New York State Assembly.
EFF opposes A.B. 1681 and all other state proposals to regulate smartphone encryption because they are terrible policy. If passed, A.B. 1681 would leave law-abiding Californians at risk for identity theft, data breach, stalking, and other invasions of privacy, with little benefit to law enforcement. It would be both ineffective and impossible to enforce. And, if that weren’t enough, it suffers from serious constitutional infirmities.
Meanwhile, in the U.S. Congress, Representative Ted Lieu has introduced H.R. 4528, the ENCRYPT Act, which would definitively preempt state bills like A.B. 1681. EFF agrees this is the right approach to state legislation in this area, although we’d like H.R. 4528 to go further and also prevent Congress and the rest of the federal government from undermining encryption.
Cooper Appointed to Key Leadership Position
Created: Thursday, 10 March 2016 11:51
SACRAMENTO – Today, Assemblymember Jim Cooper (D-Elk Grove) was appointed by Speaker Anthony Rendon to serve as Assistant Majority Floor Leader as part of the Speaker’s new leadership team.
“I want to thank Speaker Rendon for appointing me to his leadership team,” said Cooper “I am honored to be chosen to serve as Assistant Majority Floor Leader during a new era in the State Assembly. I look forward to continuing to work with Speaker Rendon and our members to make California a better place to live, work, and raise a family.”
Assemblymember Cooper represents the Cities of Sacramento, Elk Grove, Galt, and Lodi.
Posted by proverbialwisdom | Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:45 PM (1 replies)
Posted by proverbialwisdom | Fri Mar 11, 2016, 01:17 PM (1 replies)
National Acad of Sciences: "genetic transformation has potential to produce unanticipated allergens"
The New England Journal of Medicine
GMOs, Herbicides, and Public Health
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are not high on most physicians' worry lists. If we think at all about biotechnology, most of us probably focus on direct threats to human health, such as prospects for converting pathogens to biologic weapons or the implications of new technologies for editing the human germline. But while those debates simmer, the application of biotechnology to agriculture has been rapid and aggressive. The vast majority of the corn and soybeans grown in the United States are now genetically engineered. Foods produced from GM crops have become ubiquitous. And unlike regulatory bodies in 64 other countries, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not require labeling of GM foods.
Two recent developments are dramatically changing the GMO landscape. First, there have been sharp increases in the amounts and numbers of chemical herbicides applied to GM crops, and still further increases — the largest in a generation — are scheduled to occur in the next few years. Second, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified glyphosate, the herbicide most widely used on GM crops, as a “probable human carcinogen”1 and classified a second herbicide, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), as a “possible human carcinogen.”2
The application of genetic engineering to agriculture builds on the ancient practice of selective breeding. But unlike traditional selective breeding, genetic engineering vastly expands the range of traits that can be moved into plants and enables breeders to import DNA from virtually anywhere in the biosphere. Depending on the traits selected, genetically engineered crops can increase yields, thrive when irrigated with salty water, or produce fruits and vegetables resistant to mold and rot.
The National Academy of Sciences has twice reviewed the safety of GM crops — in 2000 and 2004.3 Those reviews, which focused almost entirely on the genetic aspects of biotechnology, concluded that GM crops pose no unique hazards to human health. They noted that genetic transformation has the potential to produce unanticipated allergens or toxins and might alter the nutritional quality of food. Both reports recommended development of new risk-assessment tools and postmarketing surveillance. Those recommendations have largely gone unheeded.
In our view, the science and the risk assessment supporting the Enlist Duo decision are flawed. The science consisted solely of toxicologic studies commissioned by the herbicide manufacturers in the 1980s and 1990s and never published, not an uncommon practice in U.S. pesticide regulation. These studies predated current knowledge of low-dose, endocrine-mediated, and epigenetic effects and were not designed to detect them. The risk assessment gave little consideration to potential health effects in infants and children, thus contravening federal pesticide law. It failed to consider ecologic impact, such as effects on the monarch butterfly and other pollinators. It considered only pure glyphosate, despite studies showing that formulated glyphosate that contains surfactants and adjuvants is more toxic than the pure compound.
The second new development is the determination by the IARC in 2015 that glyphosate is a “probable human carcinogen”1 and 2,4-D a “possible human carcinogen.”2 These classifications were based on comprehensive assessments of the toxicologic and epidemiologic literature that linked both herbicides to dose-related increases in malignant tumors at multiple anatomical sites in animals and linked glyphosate to an increased incidence of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in humans.
These developments suggest that GM foods and the herbicides applied to them may pose hazards to human health that were not examined in previous assessments. We believe that the time has therefore come to thoroughly reconsider all aspects of the safety of plant biotechnology. The National Academy of Sciences has convened a new committee to reassess the social, economic, environmental, and human health effects of GM crops. This development is welcome, but the committee's report is not expected until at least 2016.
In the meantime, we offer two recommendations. First, we believe the EPA should delay implementation of its decision to permit use of Enlist Duo. This decision was made in haste. It was based on poorly designed and outdated studies and on an incomplete assessment of human exposure and environmental effects. It would have benefited from deeper consideration of independently funded studies published in the peer-reviewed literature. And it preceded the recent IARC determinations on glyphosate and 2,4-D. Second, the National Toxicology Program should urgently assess the toxicology of pure glyphosate, formulated glyphosate, and mixtures of glyphosate and other herbicides.
Finally, we believe the time has come to revisit the United States' reluctance to label GM foods. Labeling will deliver multiple benefits. It is essential for tracking emergence of novel food allergies and assessing effects of chemical herbicides applied to GM crops. It would respect the wishes of a growing number of consumers who insist they have a right to know what foods they are buying and how they were produced. And the argument that there is nothing new about genetic rearrangement misses the point that GM crops are now the agricultural products most heavily treated with herbicides and that two of these herbicides may pose risks of cancer. We hope, in light of this new information, that the FDA will reconsider labeling of GM foods and couple it with adequately funded, long-term postmarketing surveillance.
Link from: http://ecowatch.com/2015/08/24/mark-hyman-labeling-gmos/
TAKEAWAY: "GM foods and the herbicides applied to them" are a package deal. Important overview articles will address open questions on both food allergy and cancer risks.
Posted by proverbialwisdom | Wed Mar 9, 2016, 03:33 PM (1 replies)