Member since: Mon Sep 7, 2009, 12:57 AM
Number of posts: 819
Number of posts: 819
A (Scottish) Sunday Herald article looks at some of the dysfunction within Scottish Labour's campaign (Reddit link as the Herald article's paywalled - they also didn't deliver to my local shop today, drat). I'm sure there's a lot more to come out, but much of the focus is inevitably on Jim Murphy:
One colleague, explaining Murphy's approach to the media, said: "He once told me he was not bothered about the words in newspapers, just the pictures, and how he looked on TV."
During the campaign, some of Murphy's supporters were taken aback by his obsession with how he looked in the tabloids: how big the photograph was; and whether he came across better than Nicola Sturgeon. He was said to have been driven mad by the exposure given to Sturgeon - particularly after the first leaders' debate involving Miliband and David Cameron - and was grumpy when a daft photo of him emerged in the media. One senior party figure said he didn't know if Murphy was campaigning for office, or for "the front page of Vogue". Members of Murphy's team admired his energy, but were bemused by his vanity. They were irked by his bad habit of pulling stupid faces in photo-shoots and grew weary of his incessant football references. He stopped dying his hair, but only reluctantly. The flip-flop campaign strategy was believed to be another reflection of Murphy's shallowness.
Meanwhile, McTernan appeared to revel in his status as Murphy's top dog. Under Johann Lamont, the then general secretary Ian Price had occupied the sole private office in the party's Bath Street headquarters. With Murphy in charge, McTernan got the office, while new general secretary Brian Roy used a desk in the open-plan area. McTernan was also unpopular among some colleagues at Holyrood and acquired a reputation for making bold statements that were rarely borne out by reality. It was said he claimed that Sturgeon would struggle in the first UK leaders' debate, and announced that an event by Gordon Brown in Margaret Curran's constituency would have a big effect on the campaign. In the end, Sturgeon shone in London and the Brown press conference sank without trace. One source said McTernan had two modes: nice guy or wannabe Malcolm Tucker.
As the polls refused to budge, other grievances developed. Deputy leader Kezia Dugdale was said to have been under-used, as was senior MSP James Kelly, and Murphy's shadow cabinet was deemed to be a paper-body subordinate to his well-paid helpers.
Labour also suffered from tension between candidates in the scramble for scarce election cash. In most campaigns, Scottish political parties prioritise a handful of constituencies; this time, Labour was faced with protecting all of its seats.
Roy, to his credit, produced an incentives-based plan that rewarded effort with resources. If a Constituency Labour Party (CLP) met voter contact rates, extra leaflets would follow. According to documents seen by this newspaper, the Roy plan flushed out the grafters from the slackers. In early February, East Lothian CLP had made 1,547 voter contacts. Other CLPs were in single digits. Some seats naturally fell off the radar at Labour headquarters, but in the latter stages of the campaign insiders believed favouritism trumped effort as resources were diverted to the established "sons and daughters" - code for Jim Murphy, Douglas Alexander and Margaret Curran, the latter of whom was believed to be an undeserving resource-hogger.
I expect Murphy to be gone within the week. He's mainly hanging on now in the hope of negotiating a secure regional list slot in the 2016 Holyrood elections (oh Christ, another election ...).
Posted by Denzil_DC | Sun May 10, 2015, 09:50 AM (0 replies)
Speaking at a "People's March for the NHS" rally in Tredegar, South Wales on St. David's Day, he invokes the memory and passion of Nye Bevan:
When people are too scared to say what they really mean, when they're too careful to speak from their hearts, when integrity is too much of a risk, it's no surprise that people feel disengaged with politics. There is never an excuse to not speak up for what you think is right. You must stand up for what you believe, but first of all, by God, believe in something.
Full transcript here: http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2015/mar/02/full-text-of-michael-sheens-speech
Fuller video of speech here (won't embed): http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2015/mar/02/michael-sheen-defends-nhs-against-bland-politicians?CMP=share_btn_tw
Posted by Denzil_DC | Tue Mar 3, 2015, 07:20 PM (3 replies)
Marr introduced this interview on Sunday as a chance for people outside Scotland (a.k.a. "the rest of the UK") to get to know Sturgeon, whose SNP members of parliament may or may not play a pivotal role after the General Election.
Posted by Denzil_DC | Mon Jan 26, 2015, 08:08 AM (0 replies)
Last Night's edition of Question Time featured a question from an audience member about the Scottish National Party's influence on UK politics, which provoked some revealing responses from the panelists.
Of course, nobody from the SNP was on the panel to offer a counter-view.
Eddie Hitler lookalike UKIP Deputy Leader Paul Nuttal didn't hold back ...
In a more extensive clip, the LibDems' Tim Farron wasn't far behind him ...
Labour's Diane Abbot had the decency to look like she'd rather be anywhere else in the world at the height of the rants, then made a brave attempt to inject some semblance of sanity into the rabid frothing. As for the Tories' Esther McVey, well ...
The hashtag #BBCQT is currently trending with reactions.
As the Exposing UKIP Twitter account observed:
Exposing UKIP IMP @SLATUKIP
#UKIP blames for UK ills so far....
Gay weather ✓
ETA: Nuttal's shocked by the Liverpool Echo's readers' reactions to his performance:
UKIP MEP Paul Nuttall brands BBC Question Time reaction 'appalling'
Some of those reactions came to light as the Echo liveblogged Question Time here: http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/recap-question-time-mp-esther-8501106
Posted by Denzil_DC | Fri Jan 23, 2015, 09:02 AM (1 replies)
Steve Emerson, Fox's "terrorism expert" who's been ridiculed mercilessly, along with Fox News, on the Twitter hashtag #FOXNEWSFACTS and by UK Prime Minister David Cameron for his claims that the UK city of Birmingham is "totally Muslim," is at it again.
He went on Sky News to apologize for his earlier remarks. It ... didn't go so well.
Steven Emerson, Fox News pundit and "terrorism expert", has likened listening back to his incorrect comments on Birmingham as "like waterboarding" in another gaffe today.
While speaking on Sky News Mr Emerson apologised for his "inexcusable error" after he described Birmingham as a city that non-Muslims "simply don't go" into, but then caused further controversy by saying "hearing it over when you played it was like waterboarding I guess".
When it was mentioned that some people may find that analogy offensive Mr Emerson replied "I didn't mean to offend anyone...I deserved to have experienced the pain of listening to it over again".
(Original article plus video here (warning: autoplay ad): http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/11341426/Fox-News-terror-expert-Listening-back-Birmingham-Muslim-error-like-waterboarding.html )
Video with no ad here: http://news.sky.com/story/1406714/fox-commentator-gaffe-like-waterboarding
He also claimed to have received numerous death threats. I've no idea whether that's another of those #FOXNEWSFACTS.
Posted by Denzil_DC | Mon Jan 12, 2015, 08:47 PM (13 replies)
It shows everything practically in real time, including the European interconnectors that shunt power back and forth as supply and demand fluctuate. Hover over the dials for detailed explanations. It particularly shows the over-reliance on coal and gas, especially with so many nukes out of service at present. I don't know whether the US system is integrated enough to have a similar site available.
It has to be said that October was a pretty shitty month with periods of very high winds. Problems arise when we have large high pressure systems stalled over the UK in cold weather, meaning there's little if any wind and the windfarms lie idle. Onshore wind needs to be a stopgap while offshore and tidal/wave power systems are developed and deployed (some significant developments already under way there), which will help to fulfill the baseload needs and overcome the still-air/cold-weather deficit. We also need to use less electricity, of course ...
Posted by Denzil_DC | Fri Nov 7, 2014, 08:57 AM (1 replies)
For instance, under the UK NHS, stories about having problems accessing certain drugs and treatments similar to your family's aren't unheard of, though there the gatekeepers aren't insurance companies, but local health authorities. We've been discussing this in the UK forum here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10885614
In answer to a question from steve2470 about NHS medication coverage, muriel_volestrangler replied:
For most medications, there's a standard per prescription charge of £7.85
Various groups get free prescriptions, such as children, over 60s, pregnant women, and people on benefits. If you're getting a lot of prescriptions, you can pay for a period for all of them.
The controversy comes in because some medications are not covered by the NHS. NICE,the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, evaluates treatments such as drugs, and decides if they are effective enough for a type of treatment - an evaluation which considers the price to the NHS as well as the clinical effectiveness (and can also mean a drug is approved for some circumstances, but not others - it might be accepted as effective for one type of cancer, but still thought unproven for another, and so restricted to the first).
Related to NICE's role that m_v's mentioned, there's also the pop phrase "postcode lottery."
See Google for its prevalence.
Basically, even if NICE approves a drug or treatment, if it's new and/or expensive, there's no guarantee a patient in a particular administrative area will be able to receive it, depending on the policies and priorities of their regional health authority.
You'll maybe notice if you visit that link that the term's especially popular with the UK's RW press as a means to pick away at the foundations of the NHS, but it's a real phenomenon, and here's a brief explanation from The Guardian (over ten years old, but not too inaccurate in principle):
What is the postcode lottery?
Some problems are universal, even with single payer healthcare systems (especially when they're subject to creeping and not so subtle privatization).
Posted by Denzil_DC | Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:22 AM (3 replies)
We encountered this problem the other day and the solution isn't obvious without some Googling, so I'm posting it here.
Symptoms: Your computer is running very slowly and networking may also be running at a snail's pace.
Confirmation: Hit Ctrl-Alt-Del to start up Task Manager. In the Processes tab, check out the CPU activity for svchost.exe. If it's running high, possibly even peaking or consistently at 99%, then you probably have this problem.
Solution: If you're running a version of Internet Explorer earlier than 8, update it, then apply security update KB2870699. (Even if you never use Internet Explorer as a browser, it's an integral part of Windows XP.)
How to do it: Since your computer is running so slowly, you're best to do this in Safe Mode with Networking, where your computer should run fairly normally.
To do this, reboot and keep hitting F6 until you see a screen that offers a range of boot options. Select Safe Mode with Networking.
Using either Internet Explorer or your usual browser, download IE 8 and install it. You can find it here:
or more directly from
After installation, your computer will ask to reboot. Let it do so.
You'll now be back in your usual Windows configuration. If your system's still running slowly, you may need to reboot into Safe Mode with Networking again to do the following.
Download and install Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer 8 for Windows XP (KB2870699) from http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=40119
Reboot again. By now your computer should be running more normally.
After you've done that, visit http://update.microsoft.com/microsoftupdate/ and let it identify any other updates needed by your computer and install them. If your computer's running relatively normally by now, you don't need to do this in Safe Mode with Networking.
This resolved the 99% usage problem on one of our laptops which was originally still running IE 6. It also sped up another laptop which already had IE 8 installed but not the security update, and which was running less quickly than normal and showing intermittent 40% or so svchost.exe CPU activity even when at rest.
There may be other reasons why your computer might be running slowly, so you need to confirm that svchost.exe over-activity is the problem before applying this solution.
Afterthought: svchost.exe over-activity has been a recurrent problem with Windows XP for some years, usually tied to Windows Automatic Updates or sometimes installation of proprietary software (e.g. from Hewlett Packard) that uses an updater.
One simple solution doing the rounds is to disable Windows Automatic Updates, but that can lead to its own problems over time.
Other solutions require more tinkering under Windows XP's hood. At the time of writing, this particular instance of the svchost.exe problem does seem tied to IE and its security update, which is why I've offered this solution here rather than trying to address other possible causes and solutions that may apply now or later. It uses normal Windows processes and doesn't involve any great technical knowledge, so it's unlikely to do any harm, and it's worth trying it first before doing any more instrusive troubleshooting, as at least you'll have eliminated one possible cause.
Posted by Denzil_DC | Thu Dec 12, 2013, 08:31 AM (6 replies)
judging by your journal: http://www.democraticunderground.com/~Chuck%20Smythe
I checked Dan's blog out: http://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/
Quite a RW libertarian paradise there, from what I've seen.
Rifffling though his categories and some of his comments, Dan doesn't seem to like leftists at all, among probably WAY more than 169 other things that many folks on DU generally stand for--unions, Barack Obama, the ACA, gun control, environmentalism ...
You wouldn't happen to actually be Dan, would you, Chuck?
Posted by Denzil_DC | Sat Nov 16, 2013, 07:30 PM (0 replies)
Go to Page: 1